Maybe it's irrelevant, but I'm getting the sense that the boxing public is picking canelo over cotto as the odds on favorite. I can't help but wonder why? What exactly has canelo done over his career to put him in that position in your eyes. How does canelos boxing abilities match up to cottos. Power,speed,head and foot movement,punch resistance,stamina. My bad if this isn't the best thread just bored and slow at work.
I think cotto is a much better boxer than canelo. As long he keeps his distance he should be fine. I think canelos power is overrated but it's still good enough to hurt a fragile cotto.
Canelo..... a year ago most people would say Canelo whoops Cotto but because of his wins over the mighty Delvin and Martinez it's near 50/50 on who wins but a fighter don't just get better at 33.
Cotto is the same Cotto that lost to Trout, timing is everything and that's why he rejected Canelo to fight crippled Martinez for less money.
Yeah, because a fourth tittle in a different weight division means nothing! Common now.
Canelo..... a year ago most people would say Canelo whoops Cotto but because of his wins over the mighty Delvin and Martinez it's near 50/50 on who wins but a fighter don't just get better at 33.
Cotto is the same Cotto that lost to Trout, timing is everything and that's why he rejected Canelo to fight crippled Martinez for less money.
I'd lean towards Canelo. But Cotto would be in the hunt given Nelo's difficulty in cutting off the ring and Cotto's reasonable ability to box off the back foot.
If Cotto tried to fight as he has post-Trout he'd be in trouble. Canelo would remind him of what weight-class he's in.
Canelo because Cotto hasnt had a legit win since what clottley? jennings?
Damn maidana did some serious work on floyd the first fight. Was watching ure sig thing over and over lol