What the hell is with that? The guys complaining most all seem to be the rabid Pac fans. How is this possible? What relationship is there? Both southpaws? Because their fighting styles, which you guys always talk about, are the absolute opposite.
Considering that they've always been about aggression and pushing the fight, why does it seem to be the rabid Pac fans complaining about robbery? How can you hypocritical pricks talk on one hand about Floyd, Rigo etc supposedly fighting like a *****, then on the other hand say this was a robbery, when it was only Canelo pushing the fight? This was worse than both Floyd and Rigo.
You guys argue that Pac should have won the Marquez fights because he pushed it and went for the KO more, but now you're all saying Lara boxed well, had better defense making Canelo miss more and got robbed...:pat:
You guys are ****ed. You talk about great defense winning the fight, without any offense though, then you'll go complain like little girls about Floyd winning a fight with better defense, and offense. Have some principle.
If you go for the 'aggression wins fights' you have to think Canelo won this fight, because he landed the harder shots, pushed it, and actually tried to go for the KO.
You all suck ass. Bunch of hypocritical pansies.
Either way, enough with the robbery talk! There was no robbery. Pro boxing is about who controlled the fight fight, had the more effective aggression and who landed the harder punches. Canelo was a deserving winner.
and Mayweather fans are trying to talk it up to make their guy look better, yet they're not a "cancer"?
Floboners are very conflicted on this fight. They would normally root for Lara, but Canelo has to look good to make their hero look good. They are ardent believers of triangle theories, especially when it comes to their idol. Real fans know that every fight is different. In this case Canelo beat Lara, therefore floydspastics automatically believes Floyd would beat Lara, too.
All very childish.
Indeed.
No they're not. Just go read the rbr thread and the "robbery" posts made immediately after the fight to see what BennyST was referring to.
As for me....115-113 either way would have been fine. But Lara circling and circling without punching makes me feel like he didn't deserve it. It's not enough just to make people miss, you have to make them miss AND make them pay too. With counter shots.
So Canelo did that with Trout? He made him miss, and didn't do anything :lol1:
117-111 was a joke and we all know it. I'm fine with 115-113 either way also, Canelo is hype.
and Mayweather fans are trying to talk it up to make their guy look better, yet they're not a "cancer"?
No they're not. Just go read the rbr thread and the "robbery" posts made immediately after the fight to see what BennyST was referring to.
As for me....115-113 either way would have been fine. But Lara circling and circling without punching makes me feel like he didn't deserve it. It's not enough just to make people miss, you have to make them miss AND make them pay too. With counter shots.
I'm actually sick of these whiners. Seems they can only survive with yes people around them. Hey, crybaby, this is a forum. Like they say if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. How old are you, ten?
BTW, I'm a Pac fan and I thought it would be a 50/50 fight, and it was. Don't care who won.
65+ plus posts on a thread built upon an incorrect premise.
The idea that Pacturts were rooting for Lara is hilarious :lol1:
Lmao this.
Wtf is this thread even about? It makes me cringe how up in arms everyone gets around here about other boxers fans.
and Mayweather fans are trying to talk it up to make their guy look better, yet they're not a "cancer"?
All very childish.
Anyhow, I thought Canelo won, he's improving. GBP should keep putting him in against runners because it's developing his all round game.
If you notice I am the king of getting Flwomos to expose themselves, they give their plan away and their paranoia, especially when they deflect their ideas onto you. Like saying thing like they are hating on Canelo to make Floyds win look bad, they just exposed themselves because that is what they do to Pacquiao hahaah.
its fun, they call me a pactart and yet everyone who knows me knows i am not pactart but if you remotely even defend Pac over Floyd you are either a filipino, racist or a pactart lol.
They have some type of race bias paranoia insecurity thinking people are jealous racist etc, yet they are the ones who are jealous, racist and envious.
They need to let go of that race crap, I still laughed when Big Dunn claimed anyone who said Broner was trying to be like Floyd was a racist and thinks all blacks are alike.:wtf:
pact@rds are the worst thing to ever happen the boxing......biggest group of crybabies and hypocrites in the sport of boxing. they justify everything, even the algieri/rios fights.....yet criticizes gbp/al haymon fighters. pact@rds are idiots.
http://i60.tinypic.com/22zz44.gif
Pac tards want to discredit Canelo so that by extension they can discredit Floyd. Because ultimately everything always comes back to Floyd for them.
They are a cancer on the sport.
and Mayweather fans are trying to talk it up to make their guy look better, yet they're not a "cancer"?
All very childish.
Anyhow, I thought Canelo won, he's improving. GBP should keep putting him in against runners because it's developing his all round game.
What the hell is with that? The guys complaining most all seem to be the rabid Pac fans. How is this possible? What relationship is there? Both southpaws? Because their fighting styles, which you guys always talk about, are the absolute opposite.
Considering that they've always been about aggression and pushing the fight, why does it seem to be the rabid Pac fans complaining about robbery? How can you hypocritical pricks talk on one hand about Floyd, Rigo etc supposedly fighting like a *****, then on the other hand say this was a robbery, when it was only Canelo pushing the fight? This was worse than both Floyd and Rigo.
You guys argue that Pac should have won the Marquez fights because he pushed it and went for the KO more, but now you're all saying Lara boxed well, had better defense making Canelo miss more and got robbed...:pat:
You guys are ****ed. You talk about great defense winning the fight, without any offense though, then you'll go complain like little girls about Floyd winning a fight with better defense, and offense. Have some principle.
If you go for the 'aggression wins fights' you have to think Canelo won this fight, because he landed the harder shots, pushed it, and actually tried to go for the KO.
You all suck ass. Bunch of hypocritical pansies.
Either way, enough with the robbery talk! There was no robbery. Pro boxing is about who controlled the fight fight, had the more effective aggression and who landed the harder punches. Canelo was a deserving winner.
Am surprise why you wonder why hypocritical Pac fans complain the most. :thinking:
Benny and everyone agreeing with him in this thread are complaining about something that just isn't true. I'm still not seeing Pac fans complaining about anything except Lara's running.
This fight had pac, floyd, klit, and cotto tards alike split regarding the decision.
Benny and everyone agreeing with him in this thread are complaining about something that just isn't true. I'm still not seeing Pac fans complaining about anything except Lara's running.
pact@rds are the worst thing to ever happen the boxing......biggest group of crybabies and hypocrites in the sport of boxing. they justify everything, even the algieri/rios fights.....yet criticizes gbp/al haymon fighters. pact@rds are idiots.
What the hell is with that? The guys complaining most all seem to be the rabid Pac fans. How is this possible? What relationship is there? Both southpaws? Because their fighting styles, which you guys always talk about, are the absolute opposite.
Considering that they've always been about aggression and pushing the fight, why does it seem to be the rabid Pac fans complaining about robbery? How can you hypocritical pricks talk on one hand about Floyd, Rigo etc supposedly fighting like a *****, then on the other hand say this was a robbery, when it was only Canelo pushing the fight? This was worse than both Floyd and Rigo.
You guys argue that Pac should have won the Marquez fights because he pushed it and went for the KO more, but now you're all saying Lara boxed well, had better defense making Canelo miss more and got robbed...:pat:
You guys are ****ed. You talk about great defense winning the fight, without any offense though, then you'll go complain like little girls about Floyd winning a fight with better defense, and offense. Have some principle.
If you go for the 'aggression wins fights' you have to think Canelo won this fight, because he landed the harder shots, pushed it, and actually tried to go for the KO.
You all suck ass. Bunch of hypocritical pansies.
Either way, enough with the robbery talk! There was no robbery. Pro boxing is about who controlled the fight fight, had the more effective aggression and who landed the harder punches. Canelo was a deserving winner.
had lara winning
i am no pac fan
No you call everyone racist and report them, and you have already said you were a pro black person.
And no I never was utterly amazed by Pacman when he wins, Brandon Rios fought the wrong fight against Manny. I also predicted JMM would KO Pac with the same right hand he knocked out his sparring partner with.
And yes Algieri is a difficult style match up for Pac, it came out of your own mouth, you aid Pac had trouble with boxers, and algieir stylistically is a harder match up for Manny, than Maidana is for Floyd.
Be honest dude stop being stupid. You say the things that y ou do, that is what you Flowmos do not me you got me all wrong you paranoid fuk.
Who else would say the things I say except me?
Word is Algieiri is holding out. You better get working on the "mike alvarado has incredible stamina from living so high above sea level and will therefore be difficult for manny " thread.
People are saying Canelo won because of body punching
Same with Castillo vs mayweather
I scored that fight 114-112 mayweather
No, not the same. At all. Just because someone throws body punches doesn't mean it's similar to someone else doing it. How old are we again?
This coming from a poster who made a thread about algieri being a difficult style matchup for manny and a live dog. You also pick manny to lose every fight so you can pretend to be utterly amazed by him winning.
Now you can call me a racist per usual.
No you call everyone racist and report them, and you have already said you were a pro black person.
And no I never was utterly amazed by Pacman when he wins, Brandon Rios fought the wrong fight against Manny. I also predicted JMM would KO Pac with the same right hand he knocked out his sparring partner with.
And yes Algieri is a difficult style match up for Pac, it came out of your own mouth, you aid Pac had trouble with boxers, and algieir stylistically is a harder match up for Manny, than Maidana is for Floyd.
Be honest dude stop being stupid. You say the things that y ou do, that is what you Flowmos do not me you got me all wrong you paranoid fuk.