Imagine if khan was fighting Rod Salka next

You guys grief him enough for fighting a top contender in luis collazo :rofl: You haven't seen the beating Danny is taking for fighting this bum Salka??? I'm one of his biggest supporters here and I've even joined in on the fun. Lol

you can also add that tim didnt want to fight khan and i quote "what if i lose" thats unacceptable. tim vs khan was the fight to be made at 140. Tbf to tim he had just fought an undefeated and more highly regarded Alexander. Both guys had assurances win or lose tier next fights were on HBO. Not sure what kind of deal he got offered having that next fight be a tough one against khan. He was promised a date regardless so I'm sure he felt he didn't need the risk. As for those saying collazo wasn't a top contender. Who else was? He had never been dominated and gave everyone he fought a tough night. I'm sorry but we can't say that he was of the same nobody level of Salka.

Bradley was dominated by Prov??You'd give Maidana a fighter who lied about an injury to get out of a fight with Bradley a shot at beating Bradley,flat footed Kotelnik..LMAO dude,I really believe your reaching and reaching far..Me saying guy's like Holt(who has the power to knock Khan senseless,and the athletic ability to land clean)Abergu who also is a very rangy and powerful guy..Alexander,did Khan just not avoid him??I'm saying come on now..This is not the same boat I'd put Bradley in..IMO he's proven to be better then all the fighters named.. Witter chased Hatton and called him out for yrs..If he is what ya say,Hatton should have fought him..There was a reason he did not..To try and downplay this win for Bradley based off when and how he won it is also showing your not being fair yet again..Not to mention it's the reason why ya can't see Bradley's resume is way(way!!!!)better then Khans.. Listen this is all ya need to know..Bradley has never been dominated in any fight..Khan has been dominated more then once..Really all that needs to be said.. you can also add that tim didnt want to fight khan and i quote "what if i lose" thats unacceptable. tim vs khan was the fight to be made at 140.

He is still a better fighter overall then Khan..Wouldn't you say?? It's all about "that" moment you took on that opponent. When Maidana beat Ortiz it was one hell of an upset as he was brought in to lose, but its not his problem Ortiz turned out to be this way cuz at that time it meant a lot. Bradley didn't box the version that beat Corrales for instance or was worth anything really & was shot to sh1t. With your logic Khan spanking Barrera counts as a genuine win cuz overall Barrera was twice the fighter Tim & Casamayor were.

Well I think Mayweather is 10 times the fighter Bradley is and he gave him a superb fight. Kotelnik was a good fighter, i think he has a shot at beating Bradley at 140 yes. Can't see why that is so far fetched. And yes, Bradley was dominated by Provo - why deny this? He was out on his feet, but probs for coming back and winning even though I thought Provo took it. And also didn't get credit for a KD. Holt might have the power. So what? The same could be said for Judah, Maidana, Collazo etc. Khan beat them. Power isn't everything. If you think Maidana was afraid of Bradley you are high mate. I remember the time, but can't recall exactly what happened. Probably not different to Bradley ducking Khan. Why are you trying to make out Bradley is a beast though? He's a good little fighter, but he's hardly dominating against top fighters. And just because someone calls someone else out and the fight doesn't happen it doesn't mean one ducked. Should Hatton had called off the Vegas fights, the mayweather fight or pacquiao fights to fight Witter? Lol. As if. Lol at Bradley hasn't been dominated. I don't know in what world you live in, but it certainly isn't this one. Personally thought Bradley was extremely lucky not to have the referee step in and stop that fight, look at how long it took Bradley to recover after that fight he said it himself... If Bradley fights more of them he will be full blown punch drunk way before his time. I think Bradley would overwhelm Kotelnik but I think the 140lbs and 147lbs of Maidana wrecks Bradley and stops him, perhaps not easily but I definitely see Maidana stopping him If Ruslan can do that to Bradley so can Chino. I really hate how people are trying to down play Collazo, I remember a lot of people saying Collazo would make easy work of Khan and that Khans chin would be left all over the canvas and now that it was Collazo who was the only one to taste canvas the people who don't like AK are spouting BS to suit their little idea, Collazo is a great name to have on your resume for your first proper 147lbs fight.

he'd get sh*t on as well.

Well I think Mayweather is 10 times the fighter Bradley is and he gave him a superb fight. Kotelnik was a good fighter, i think he has a shot at beating Bradley at 140 yes. Can't see why that is so far fetched. And yes, Bradley was dominated by Provo - why deny this? He was out on his feet, but probs for coming back and winning even though I thought Provo took it. And also didn't get credit for a KD. Holt might have the power. So what? The same could be said for Judah, Maidana, Collazo etc. Khan beat them. Power isn't everything. If you think Maidana was afraid of Bradley you are high mate. I remember the time, but can't recall exactly what happened. Probably not different to Bradley ducking Khan. Why are you trying to make out Bradley is a beast though? He's a good little fighter, but he's hardly dominating against top fighters. And just because someone calls someone else out and the fight doesn't happen it doesn't mean one ducked. Should Hatton had called off the Vegas fights, the mayweather fight or pacquiao fights to fight Witter? Lol. As if. Lol at Bradley hasn't been dominated. I don't know in what world you live in, but it certainly isn't this one. I'm not gonna continue this convo any longer,it's just opinion..I just don't believe you know the definition of dominate..Hey be cool bro..

are you serious? THAT version of Casamayor that faced Bradley, gtfo you piece of **** LMAO,guess your comprehension is terrible..Overall,do you know what this means...

Bradley was dominated by Prov??You'd give Maidana a fighter who lied about an injury to get out of a fight with Bradley a shot at beating Bradley,flat footed Kotelnik..LMAO dude,I really believe your reaching and reaching far..Me saying guy's like Holt(who has the power to knock Khan senseless,and the athletic ability to land clean)Abergu who also is a very rangy and powerful guy..Alexander,did Khan just not avoid him??I'm saying come on now..This is not the same boat I'd put Bradley in..IMO he's proven to be better then all the fighters named.. Witter chased Hatton and called him out for yrs..If he is what ya say,Hatton should have fought him..There was a reason he did not..To try and downplay this win for Bradley based off when and how he won it is also showing your not being fair yet again..Not to mention it's the reason why ya can't see Bradley's resume is way(way!!!!)better then Khans.. Listen this is all ya need to know..Bradley has never been dominated in any fight..Khan has been dominated more then once..Really all that needs to be said.. Bradley has been dominated twice by pacquiao and was out on his feet the whole fight against provodnikov which I thought he lost by a close decision. Khan has never been dominated but only ko'd, you can't count the peterson fight the guy was roiding, got hometown decision thanks to joe 'lets throw some thunder' cooper, even due to the circumstances many believe khan still won.

He is still a better fighter overall then Khan..Wouldn't you say?? are you serious? THAT version of Casamayor that faced Bradley, gtfo you piece of ****

Bradley was dominated by Prov??You'd give Maidana a fighter who lied about an injury to get out of a fight with Bradley a shot at beating Bradley,flat footed Kotelnik..LMAO dude,I really believe your reaching and reaching far..Me saying guy's like Holt(who has the power to knock Khan senseless,and the athletic ability to land clean)Abergu who also is a very rangy and powerful guy..Alexander,did Khan just not avoid him??I'm saying come on now.. Witter chased Hatton and called him out for yrs..If he is what ya say,Hatton should have fought him..There was a reason he did not..To try and downplay this win for Bradley based off when and how he won it is also showing your not being fair yet again..Not to mention it's the reason why ya can't see Bradley's resume is way(way!!!!)better then Khans.. Listen this is all ya need to know..Bradley has never been dominated in any fight..Khan has been dominated more then once..Really all that needs to be said.. Well I think Mayweather is 10 times the fighter Bradley is and he gave him a superb fight. Kotelnik was a good fighter, i think he has a shot at beating Bradley at 140 yes. Can't see why that is so far fetched. And yes, Bradley was dominated by Provo - why deny this? He was out on his feet, but probs for coming back and winning even though I thought Provo took it. And also didn't get credit for a KD. Holt might have the power. So what? The same could be said for Judah, Maidana, Collazo etc. Khan beat them. Power isn't everything. If you think Maidana was afraid of Bradley you are high mate. I remember the time, but can't recall exactly what happened. Probably not different to Bradley ducking Khan. Why are you trying to make out Bradley is a beast though? He's a good little fighter, but he's hardly dominating against top fighters. And just because someone calls someone else out and the fight doesn't happen it doesn't mean one ducked. Should Hatton had called off the Vegas fights, the mayweather fight or pacquiao fights to fight Witter? Lol. As if. Lol at Bradley hasn't been dominated. I don't know in what world you live in, but it certainly isn't this one.

Of course maidana is better dont be silly. Khan has a funny way of losing all fantasy matchups - but let's just forget how Bradley was dominated by Provo, Pacquiao and large parts of the Marquez fight - which u thought he won. Bradley is far from a beast and most of his best wins have come by very close decisions. Which inguess can happen when you fight good guys, but Khan mostly beats them convincingly. Mostly. As for Holt beating Khan - please. Don't be silly. I could say the same for Kotelnik and Maidana beating Bradley. I think they stand a good chance. Khan should have a win over Peterson - of course he should. It was home cooking at its best. From the ref, to the judges to the man in the hat. To peds. The whole saga was awful. It should obviously had been a NC I think most people would agree. Even with the points off, I still think Khan won. But hey, **** happens. and Witter was not avoided by Hatton, that's just dumb. Witter is domestic British level at best and was never better than that. No reason to build that win. Bradley was dominated by Prov??You'd give Maidana a fighter who lied about an injury to get out of a fight with Bradley a shot at beating Bradley,flat footed Kotelnik..LMAO dude,I really believe your reaching and reaching far..Me saying guy's like Holt(who has the power to knock Khan senseless,and the athletic ability to land clean)Abergu who also is a very rangy and powerful guy..Alexander,did Khan just not avoid him??I'm saying come on now..This is not the same boat I'd put Bradley in..IMO he's proven to be better then all the fighters named.. Witter chased Hatton and called him out for yrs..If he is what ya say,Hatton should have fought him..There was a reason he did not..To try and downplay this win for Bradley based off when and how he won it is also showing your not being fair yet again..Not to mention it's the reason why ya can't see Bradley's resume is way(way!!!!)better then Khans.. Listen this is all ya need to know..Bradley has never been dominated in any fight..Khan has been dominated more then once..Really all that needs to be said..

khan is now a haymon fighter. expect him to fight the rod salsas of the sport. gone are the good old days of boxing. too many ducks have infested the sport. thanks to floyd and haymon. :bigeyes: http://oi62.tinypic.com/2crmyjn.jpg He good for boxing doe

khan is now a haymon fighter. expect him to fight the rod salsas of the sport. gone are the good old days of boxing. too many ducks have infested the sport. thanks to floyd and haymon. :bigeyes:

Top contender Luis Collazo????

Khan would get clowned no doubt because Khan gets clowned on everything, it is so fun and easy so it would be worse probably but there would also be more people defending which is what would really make it worse because there would be more back and forth than just dudes cracking jokes on Salka. Still boxing is what have you done for me lately which pretty much comes down to what did you do last time out. Khan looked good last time out in some ways the best he has ever looked while Garcia got made to look very bad by Herrera. So the guys despite Garcia knocking Khan out not that long ago are moving in different directions at this moment.

Danny Garcia is being Criticized badly for taking this fight and rightfully so, the same would happened to Khan.

I disagree with Maidana being better then Prov..I actually think Prov is more athletic then Maidana..He also places his punches better then Maidana as well..There is some misconception about these fighters imo,I would give anyone of the fighters named when Bradley fought them,Abregu Alexander Prov Holt all have a very good shot at beating Khan..Nobody on Khans resume stands a chance..Not even the so called Maidana who you said nobody wanted to fight..Yet was it not Maidana who fake injury in order not to fight Bradley..I never hear this talked about at all btw.. Bradley beat Champions..You say come on about Witter,who at the time was avoided by Hatton and was ranked num 1 at Jr WW..I mean come on bro your really not being fair here..I bring up belts cause Bradley has won every belt off of the Champion..That is a very impressive thing,and it's not easy.. As for the whole Pac fight..I really don't wanna go down this road at all..I think this forum knows my stance on this matter..Bradley beat Pac,like it or not..It's his best win,added on to a really really good resume..Now if you wanna say before Bradley added Pac and Marquez that Khan and Bradley's resume was closer(imo Bradley still had a better resume)ok..Right now,their resumes are far apart..Khan has to play catch up for real.. Why should he(Khan)have beat Peterson..I really don't agree with this either..Now if ya wanna say it should have been a no contest,I could get with that a lil more..That fight was close,and I had a draw,there were plenty of people who saw the fight for Peterson..I don't think it's clear it should have been a W for Khan.. Of course maidana is better dont be silly. Khan has a funny way of losing all fantasy matchups - but let's just forget how Bradley was dominated by Provo, Pacquiao and large parts of the Marquez fight - which i thought he won. Bradley is far from a beast and most of his best wins have come by very close decisions. Which inguess can happen when you fight good guys, but Khan mostly beats them convincingly. Mostly. As for Holt beating Khan - please. Don't be silly. I could say the same for Kotelnik and Maidana beating Bradley. I think they stand a good chance. Khan should have a win over Peterson - of course he should. It was home cooking at its best. From the ref, to the judges to the man in the hat. To peds. The whole saga was awful. It should obviously had been a NC I think most people would agree. Even with the points off, I still think Khan won. But hey, **** happens. and Witter was not avoided by Hatton, that's just dumb. Witter is domestic British level at best and was never better than that. No reason to build that win.

Then it would be an even fight....

What do you mean by the rest of the world?? you and your family members? :thinking: Khan needs to beat top level opposition like Robert Salad to be accepted by the MURRRICANS ;) lol Happy belated 4th of July for all the Yanks btw.