GEORGE GROVES wants a referee who will 'take no prisoners' for his rematch with Carl Froch.
The London super-middleweight is still fuming about how their first fight ended in November when British referee Howard Foster stopped it in the ninth round.
Groves, 26, believes Foster jumped in too early and has demanded neutral officials inside and out of the ring for his mouth-watering rematch with Froch at Wembley a week on Saturday
Click Here To Read More]
Yes, because the referee was the one, who was hurt by Froch, out on his feet, and not throwing back...
That's just the most ludicrous post I've read about the stoppage. We must have very different definitions of not throwing back. They weren't scoring punches but to his detriment he was trying to fire back instead of holding or covering up.
Groves and J M Marquez should go out for a pint together.
They could bond together while moaning about how flat the pint is, how the room temparature was wrong and how the bar man short-changed them.
I feel a bit for the guy, it must suck to have a blemish on your record from what in most peoples eyes was a premature stoppage. I must admit I think it was more his inexperience that cost him.
However this guy moans more than my damn mother!
Can he not just go one day without whinging? STFU, train your ass off & don't let yourself get put in such a position again.
Yes, because the referee was the one, who was hurt by Froch, out on his feet, and not throwing back...
Yes because the referee stopped the fight way too early, it was ridiculous.
Smoger jumps to mind as a good referee who let's fighters go at it.
Boxer: Knocked out.
Smoger: Can you continue?
Plus if you get knocked out, he kisses you