Agree with this? I like watching all four of these guys but there's always a chance that Chisora in great shape is still getting done the same way by Fury. That may have been more of a styles thing than anything. I see Glazkov/Jennings as being as meaningful on the contender scene as that fight and maybe even more interesting after Glazkov's showing against Adamek and Jennnings against Szpilka. Those were both impressive performances to me. Anybody else agree with this?
More meaningful IMO
They're both undefeated and talented, coming off good wins & both guys have fought a wider variety of styles.
Fury v Chisora is not an important fight, what is selling that is them both being nutcases rather than intrigue or talent. Its almost a fake grudge match and I am not buying Chisora is this much improved fighter with the weight loss. Frankly I feel hes even worse and has not looked good in 5-6 fights, in fact he looked downright awful in them. Some fighters take a shot much better carrying some excess weight, to me Chisora is one of them.
I won't say he is drained but I'll use the term, flat.
Speaking of Chisora being out of shape it should be noted that was the worst shape Tyson Fury has ever been in himself & he still won handily.
That's a damn good fight to make but Fury/Chisora is more meaningful as its pretty much as good as a title eliminator. Whereas Jennings and Glazkov still need a fight like maybe Arreola, Povetkin, or Pulev to really put themselves in a good position for a title fight.
Both would be is heavyweight wars though!