If they did make Jennings/Glazkov, it's as good/meaningful as or better than Fury/Del

Wow, don't know if I agree with some of that but I'll tell you one thing. Them both being nutcases makes it more entertaining for me either way.

More meaningful IMO They're both undefeated and talented, coming off good wins & both guys have fought a wider variety of styles. Fury v Chisora is not an important fight, what is selling that is them both being nutcases rather than intrigue or talent. Its almost a fake grudge match and I am not buying Chisora is this much improved fighter with the weight loss. Frankly I feel hes even worse and has not looked good in 5-6 fights, in fact he looked downright awful in them. Some fighters take a shot much better carrying some excess weight, to me Chisora is one of them. I won't say he is drained but I'll use the term, flat. Speaking of Chisora being out of shape it should be noted that was the worst shape Tyson Fury has ever been in himself & he still won handily.

That's a damn good fight to make but Fury/Chisora is more meaningful as its pretty much as good as a title eliminator. Whereas Jennings and Glazkov still need a fight like maybe Arreola, Povetkin, or Pulev to really put themselves in a good position for a title fight. Both would be is heavyweight wars though!