Ricky Hatton: "Amir Khan Will Never Be Defeated If He Boxes Instead of Brawls."

Yes no bias there...Amir Khan boxes, but eventually get his bell rung his defense is not all that good not to mention his china chin, then he stupidly brawls buzzed,and gets put to sleep. The headline should be "If Khan could manage to stay awake,and box after he gets his bell rung he could be hard to beat". Sh*t Prescot almost killed him within the first 30 seconds with one punch no amount of great boxing is gonna save you if you have a glass chin, and no master defense to protect it.

:lol1: Ole Ricky 'atton still hasn't recovered from that turnbuckle eh? That first lost is always the hardest to take .... I like Hatton, he was one hell of a fighter with much heart -- Definitely a future HOF'er . But his statements about Khan are reaching just a little too far ......

:lol1: Ole Ricky 'atton still hasn't recovered from that turnbuckle eh?

What is even there to debate? You can't even read son. I would guess the butthurt is staring to marinate a little ... Your so-called attempts at a reply throughout this thread have been incoherent and without focus. Even King Con deserves better Khan-tards than you guys :lol1: Your quite horrible at defending his position.

Here's a little side-note, that will take some time for your simple mind to figure out ..... If there wasn't anything to discredit, could I??? Floyd-Pac fans go at discrediting the other guy's wins all the time even though those two are ATGs. So, you're retarded response is irrelevant. And that link to a Colozzo thread is your so-called evidence\proof .... Wow, you're silly as shit. It was a Brook thread, air head. I am a silly sh1t now that is some fancy vocabulary coming from someone who can't even read properly to distinguish between actual quotes and the author's opinion in an article. Oh and the Collazo quote was genuine evidence to prove you are a dork. You were bigging up Collazo and then turned on him as if he was a bum only cuz Khan won, Hypocrite much? You remind me of one of those retarded kids that had his Batman doll stolen as a kid, and now that you're in late puberty you're looking for another hero to worship. Batman doll? Action figure more like, but I am assuming you've only been around dildos to even know the difference. And of all the people out there, you've chosen "King Con" to worship, in spite of the fact that he's the biggest con-artist in boxing .... that's enough proof that you're not a boxing fan, you're a pathetic pseudo-hero worshiping groupie. And Khan :lol1: is your hero! \Discussion (Its extremely Difficult to debate facts with guys that have their hero's nuts firmly planted in both cheeks) What is even there to debate? You can't even read son.

I've never said Khan doesn't run. I don't flying fcuk as long as Khan wins. I want him to head butt like Ward, clinch like Wlad and run like Bolt as long as he wins. I also never said he is great, but you are the one who shows up every thread discrediting what he does. Didn't you pick Collazo to shock Khan then all of a sudden it doesn't count that Khan beat him? That was my point of responding to you. Always discrediting...always. Evidence? Here's some evidence: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=630411&page=4 An evidence to prove what kind of a deluded moron you are. After reading your post and my response to it in that thread you will realize that you ARE the b1tch....b1tch. Here's a little side-note, that will take some time for your simple mind to figure out ..... If there wasn't anything to discredit, could I??? And that link to a Colozzo thread is your so-called evidence\proof .... Wow, you're silly as shit. You remind me of one of those retarded kids that had his Batman doll stolen as a kid, and now that you're in late puberty you're looking for another hero to worship. And of all the people out there, you've chosen "King Con" to worship, in spite of the fact that he's the biggest con-artist in boxing .... that's enough proof that you're not a boxing fan, you're a pathetic pseudo-hero worshiping groupie. And Khan :lol1: is your hero! \Discussion (Its extremely Difficult to debate facts with guys that have their hero's nuts firmly planted in both cheeks)

A totally irrelevant fight. He probably got a **** load of £ just to turn up. When it mattered (Olympics), Khan lost. I agree it was pointless because Olympics is when it mattered. You don't get paid to fight in amateurs and all the $ for training and other expenses is generated through sponsorships or govt funding. The fact that Khan rematching an opponent doesn't mean anything proves one more point that Khan-Prescott rematch is pointless, because when it mattered when both were undefeated Khan lost. Prescott went in to an oblivion and Khan the other way, so whether today or 3 years ago it was pointless. So, Garcia loss is the only one Khan needs to avenge after all given both are relevant among other things.

Amir Khan is a B grade fighter with no stamina, chin. I predict he get KTFO if he fights Maidana again.

Your post is a perfect example of the Khan-tards rap .... You don't address a single talking point or issue that was raised -- Instead you present rehearsed phrases that have no relevancy to the points. You didn't address the fact that Khan was running non-stop after getting the body-shot KD ..... Did you? You don't present a single shred of proof to support the shit you're typing. And Yet, I can present video after video of Khan way of winning. Hit and run like a freakin deer caught in headlights. Now, you present your proof that Khan the great is all that and I'll present all the videos showing just how much a fake Khan is ..... Accept that Bitch!!! I've never said Khan doesn't run. I don't flying fcuk as long as Khan wins. I want him to head butt like Ward, clinch like Wlad and run like Bolt as long as he wins. I also never said he is great, but you are the one who shows up every thread discrediting what he does. Didn't you pick Collazo to shock Khan then all of a sudden it doesn't count that Khan beat him? Collazo is going to shock the shit out of Team Khan :boxing: This is a better focused, determined and rededicated version of Collazo and a lot more dangerous. That was my point of responding to you. Always discrediting...always. Evidence? Here's some evidence: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=630411&page=4 An evidence to prove what kind of a deluded moron you are. After reading your post and my response to it in that thread you will realize that you ARE the b1tch....b1tch.

The constantly pushing, holding opponents head down and running Khan

Maybe its near your bed time now. Don't run away yet .... I'm just getting started

So by your logic Khan runs in every fight yet he has 19 KO's in 32 fights?, what about Mayweather then? The Best Ever? Should we just tag his as the Ultimate Runner inside the Ring? You son are a definition of True retard no point arguing with a sore retard like you. and Yes there's videos all over Youtube Khan Stopping Malignaggi, Dropping Maidana like a Street Hooker, Dropping PEDerson twice in 1st round, Knocking Judah Out with a Bodyshot, knocking Collazo down 3 times 3 times almost Knocking Him Out. Seeya :cool3: There you go with the same ole, same ole ..... You guys must be pretty pathetic to look-up to and idolize a delusional part-time sprinter that masquerades as a boxer. The only way Khan wins is because no one can catch him while he running around the ring, PERIOD!!!! And that's the point you nuthuggers cannot deny, that's why you vomit up the same talking points non-stop. Every fight Khan was won because no one can run as fast as he can in the ring.

So much noise about khan. In reality in the last two years the guys has wins over Carlos Molina julio diaz which he was lucky to escape that fight and Luis collazo who lets be honest was totally ****ing irrelevant until a few months ago. If it weren't for the politics of boxing khan would be another c level fighter but instead golden boy is feeding his cans to keep his head above water so they can make a fight with mayweather.

Hattons in awe of Khan as he handled Collazo easily, whilst Hatton went life and death with Collazo? But that was years ago and Collazo isn't that beast from years ago.

Incoherent babble, that doesn't address a single point that was raised. Your post is a perfect example of the Khan-tards rap .... You don't address a single talking point or issue that was raised -- Instead you present rehearsed phrases that have no relevancy to the points. You didn't address the fact that Khan was running non-stop after getting the body-shot KD ..... Did you? You don't present a single shred of proof to support the shit you're typing. And Yet, I can present video after video of Khan way of winning. Hit and run like a freakin deer caught in headlights. Now, you present your proof that Khan the great is all that and I'll present all the videos showing just how much a fake Khan is ..... Accept that Bitch!!! What do you mean '' would like to interpret as a legit win''? off course it was in every form of the Rule Book (I guess the McCloskey fight you're referring to? Its you being delusional if you think McCloskey was doing some jack **** before the stoppage). No one overrates Khan or calls him some ATG we all know his weaknesses and downfalls, But you idiots talk like he gets KTFO in every other fight (while he's been KO'd only once i.e against Prescott and Garcia fight was a stoppage where Khan finished on his feet). He has some good Wins in his resume that you morons don't give him credit for and he once was World Champion at 140 just at the age of 22 and Unified Champion at 24, these are the facts you can't deny. You two guys are two sides of the same idiot coin .... What, are all Khan-groupies clowns that post the same talking points without providing a single piece of evidence. So, we're supposed to take some retards opinion over actual video showing how much of a fraud Khan is ?!?!?!?!? Add to that the fact that he's a blatant lier as well -- Just ask Ward :lol1:

Paulie- Is and never was a great boxer he is was B- class at best Kotelnyk= who???lmfao Collazo- has been irrelevant for over half a decade Judah-wow really Judah?? dude hasn't been relevant since Cotto finished him off Shutting out a B class boxer like never before is impressive. Kotelnyk schooled alexander and average boxer don't win olympic silver medals. Collazo came of his best win in his career before the khan fight, robbed vs hatton and berto. Only irrelevant due to his bad luck with injuries. Judah gave mathysse his first loss and ko'd mabuzza before the khan fight. He was also outboxing floyd and beating him for speed for a few rounds and gave floyd his first knockdown! Floyd hasn't fought many boxers, he likes them flat footed, come forward, mostly drained fighters. Khan would UD floyd. :lol1: :lol1: He lost. :pat: He beat him in a rematch....

Yeah, Maidana went down from a body shot .... And then, like always he got up and was ready to kick some azz ... and that's when, as usual, Khan got on his bike and ran like the wind for the remainder of the fight. Yes, because going down from a body shot is lesser of a knockdown than being dropped from a shot to the face/head. Now if that's what you Khan-groupies would like to interpret as a legit win, then all power to you all. But to those who have watched and boxed themselves .... that's BS!!!!! Rrrright! but losing to Peterson was legit loss. Great logic...Golf Clap. What does it even mean that you have boxed so the win is bull sh1t? So, what? I have boxed as an amateur too and? Having boxed gives you great insight than the ones who haven't, but the authority to call facts b.s isn't something you attain from having boxed. Like the fact Khan dropped and beat Maidana in a fight that was suppose to end his career and that it was a great win. Its easy to discredit Khan, because his credentials are shaky at best. Its you tards that have to struggle constantly to uphold your idol. :lol1: You make no sense at all.............as usual. Struggle? You struggle pretty hard to bad mouth every and anything Khan does. Never have I doubted that you will there on a Khan thread babbling your constant b.s. See, here the bottom line .... If Khan was as great as his delusional conned fans believed, it would be easy to state the facts. But because its all an illusion -- You nuthugger's restate the same talking points over and over hoping somebody else will join your misguided, misinformed, delusional group. And many are not having any part of that delusion ........:lame: Khan is not great, but very good. You cling on to Thurman when Khan has Guerrero, Porter and Maidana as options. You complain about Mccloskey rematch which means jack as Khan dominated him till the stoppage and the Peterson loss is genuine to you. Picked Collazo to shock Khan, but bad mouth him as a sh1t win. You call us nut huggers etc, but you are just a sad hater who pretends Khan's best wins never happened and his record 0-3. Keep hating.

I agree with Hatton. If Khan NEVER looked for the KO he would be real tuff to out point.