Winner of Porter-Brook?
Thurman?
Garcia at 147?
I don't think after only one fight at 147, and not having come from 140 with a title, he should be next up for Mayweather.
However, with a win over one of those guys, it could be argued that he would have as good a case as anyone.
Or, if not one of those, who?
I got the IF logic from Chino fans:
IF there was a rematch today.
IF he had Robert Garcia then.
IF he had Ariza then.
IF he wasn't sick.
IF he didn't just get off his couch.
So, you didn't respond, but were being yourself lol.
i don't get it, you started saying "IF" khan had 10 more seconds he would have finished maidana, isn't that the same???? i just replied using the logic you stated in your thread. you claimed maidana was incompetent, well, khan was it too.
right now I like the Guerrero fight.
Well see how he looks in his comeback fight, but he is a common opponent with Floyd and a solid ex-champ..more experience than Porter, Thurman and someone who would be viable against any of those younger dudes, and against Maidana as well. Then he can say he has three wins over common Floyd opponents.
boxing wise, I want to how he deals with RG who doesn't take kindly to being clinched and smothered. I liked what I saw out of Khan when he would sometimes linger on the inside, get low (for him), and attempt some in-fighting against Collazo, that was new. It looks like he had a focus on some things to try in that close range. RG is going to be more active in there and those things he's was trying against Collazo will have to come to him more naturally if he is to outwork guerrero. He will have a big footspeed advantage obviously, so there is a chance for him to put on a pretty complete performance against RG if he really has turned the corner.
I personally would like to see him against Porter.He loses against Thurman though. A Khan-Brool grudge match is most exciting but won't get him a May weather match like Porter could.
so? that's all you had? what happened with the aggressive passive post of you? if wasn't me the one who said khan needed 10 more seconds, was it? i just responded with the same logic (IF you can call that logic)
I got the IF logic from Chino fans:
IF there was a rematch today.
IF he had Robert Garcia then.
IF he had Ariza then.
IF he wasn't sick.
IF he didn't just get off his couch.
So, you didn't respond, but were being yourself lol.
so? who says he can't hurt anyone? you claim maidana was incompetent, so was khan. IF the round was 10 seconds longer he would have finished maidana maybe, IF the fight was a 15 rounder maidana would have finished khan maybe, you see what i did here??
What I meant to say was if Khan had 10 more seconds.
Even then you are asking for 5 more rounds for Chino, but Khan needs 10 seconds. :lol1:
did you edited your post? 'cause i don't remember reading the second part. well that unproven prospect had a belt at the time, did collazo had a belt??? oh yeah, they fought for the WBC silver championship right?? haha
porter brook winner will be great for khan if he wants the fight with mayweather in the near future, i never said the opposite. i just don't think he will take the fight, he will rather go for an easy route.
Yes, I edited it, but you quoted me before I could finish.
You're making fun of the WBC Silver title, but tha WBA interim title Thurman has is suppose to be a coveted prize in your mind. Interesting.
I actually do want Khan to take another fight for his own sake before Floyd, but the reason why I think it's okay even if he doesn't is that if Bradley could get Pacquiao because he fought a contender in Abregu who basically is a nobody then Khan should get Floyd for beating a proven veteran.
Maidana fans are the kings of "Ifs"
so? that's all you had? what happened with the aggressive passive post of you? if wasn't me the one who said khan needed 10 more seconds, was it? i just responded with the same logic (IF you can call that logic)
so you are taking my post seriously? i was just remarking that those are "IF" this and "IF" that. we don't know what could've happened. just like he said maidana couldn't finished the job, khan couldn't neither, what "IF" the ring was smaller, whta "IF" khan landed that punch earlier in the round, what "IF" maidana landed that right hand in the 5 instead of the 10.
Maidana fans are the kings of "Ifs"
10 more seconds is the same as 5 more rounds of course :lol1:
so you are taking my post seriously? i was just remarking that those are "IF" this and "IF" that. we don't know what could've happened. just like he said maidana couldn't finished the job, khan couldn't neither, what "IF" the ring was smaller, whta "IF" khan landed that punch earlier in the round, what "IF" maidana landed that right hand in the 5 instead of the 10.
it's called speculation, the other poster did it too, khan hurt maidana in the first round, he needed 10 more seconds to finished him?
10 more seconds is the same as 5 more rounds of course :lol1:
I didn't insult you, you insulted yourself.
Maidana hurt Khan badly in the 10th but he needs 15 rounds to finish him? :lol1:
it's called speculation, the other poster did it too, khan hurt maidana in the first round, he needed 10 more seconds to finished him?
no, i just used his logic. longer round, longer fight
why do you have to insult people?? can you make a point without insulting people?
I didn't insult you, you insulted yourself.
Maidana hurt Khan badly in the 10th but he needs 15 rounds to finish him? :lol1:
He is also no Maidana, but guess what happened when he fought Khan?
uhhhhh how does beating an unproven prospect get him Floyd vs beating someone with a belt like Porter-Brook winner or Guerrero, Garcia (rematch) who are at least proven fighter?
did you edited your post? 'cause i don't remember reading the second part. well that unproven prospect had a belt at the time, did collazo had a belt??? oh yeah, they fought for the WBC silver championship right?? haha
porter brook winner will be great for khan if he wants the fight with mayweather in the near future, i never said the opposite. i just don't think he will take the fight, he will rather go for an easy route.
Yeah you made yourself look stupid.
no, i just used his logic. longer round, longer fight
why do you have to insult people?? can you make a point without insulting people?
so? who says he can't hurt anyone? you claim maidana was incompetent, so was khan. IF the round was 10 seconds longer he would have finished maidana maybe, IF the fight was a 15 rounder maidana would have finished khan maybe, you see what i did here??
Yeah you made yourself look stupid.
With Khan if the round was 10 seconds longer he would have finished Maidana, where as Maidana hurt him quite early in the round and still couldn't do it also like Dirk says Khan wasn't the puncher it was Maidana
so? who says he can't hurt anyone? you claim maidana was incompetent, so was khan. IF the round was 10 seconds longer he would have finished maidana maybe, IF the fight was a 15 rounder maidana would have finished khan maybe, you see what i did here??
so was khan, he couldn't finish maidana and never hurt him again in the fight.
Khan was not the puncher in the fight. Maidana was the puncher and Khan was the glass chinned hypejob, remember? Yet Maidana failed to do his job of knocking him out despite having him wobbly for almost 3 full rounds.
Khan did his job of outboxing Maidana for the vast majority of the fight and earning a well deserved decision.
With Khan if the round was 10 seconds longer he would have finished Maidana, where as Maidana hurt him quite early in the round and still couldn't do it also like Dirk says Khan wasn't the puncher it was Maidana.
Maidana was Thurman boogeyman of the time and suppose to take Khan's head off. So, when people suggest Khan is scared it is ridiculous because beating Thurman doesn't get him anything at all let alone Floyd. So, far it has been NSB darlings Porter and Maidana who have ducked Thurman and not Khan.