So guys like Broner, Malignaggi, Guerrero and Brook are still currently in the Ring's top 10 of Welterweights, despite being either super inactive, fighting at another weight or haven't had a good win at the weight.
So Khan just put a dominant performance up against a solid contender - is he now a top 10?
And who's spot should he take?
i'd have him at #9 best ww....khan's performance had more to do with collazo having zero defense, barely throwing, and having his hands down to his side 90% of the time...
khan would get ko'ed by porter and especially thurman...
i agree with you, he should be in the top 10 around #8 atleast.
on your second point, have you thought about the fact that khan did not give collazo a chance with his constant footwork and Collazo dropping hands was part of his frustration keeping up with khan.
(Khan made collazo look average on the night )
i'd have him at #9 best ww....khan's performance had more to do with collazo having zero defense, barely throwing, and having his hands down to his side 90% of the time...
khan would get ko'ed by porter and especially thurman...
It looked like Collazo was paid to bring his d game and the ref was paid to ensure Khan got the win as well.
Are you paid to come on here and act like a spastic?
Because you should be. You do a great job.
Khan fought a slow moving punching bag last night but yes I still think he's top ten for WW division.
It looked like Collazo was paid to bring his d game and the ref was paid to ensure Khan got the win as well.
This is the transnational rankings top 10 at 147 - http://www.tbrb.org/all-rankings/#147
I'd drop Brook and have Khan in there.
It was a good if typically patchy performance from Khan. A lot of the flaws still there but clearly improved in many respects. A degree of vindication for Virgil Hunter I think.
No, but rather him being considered for Floyd's next fight will though. That's how Golden Boy owned Ring Magazine seems to work now a days :lol1: :lol1: