Is Bradley the new Berto?

A gatekeeper? I can't think of too many welters who can beat Bradley. He's top 5 at worst.

prov to bradley was sort of like ortiz to berto.. only difference was bradley got a gift decision berto didnt

nah bradley is gatekeeper.. no one has dropped a solid argument to suggest otherwise.. his only legit & indisputable win against a "perceived" top fighter was against alexander.. but porter showed alexander is overrated.. porter is same guy who drew (and some think lost) to diaz - the guy khan beat easy.. anyway every other bradley "win" against top fighters could have easily been a loss with different judges.. he just lucky cos he was on home turf

some of you guys aren't capable of seeing the bigger picture.. i suppose only a few people have the same sort of ability as myself but that's nothing new.. let me simplify things for yall - bradley is overrated and yall are creating a false hype around him.. he could easily have 4 losses on his record against fighters who arent even natural welterweights.. he'd have a fifth loss if he had the balls to face khan at 140.. You do know Bradley is not a natural WW either right??:dunce: He could have,but he does not..He actually only has one loss..:dunce: Berto wishes he's had near the career as Bradley has..:dunce: Bradley has never been over hyped and has had to work for everything he's got..:dunce:

some of you guys aren't capable of seeing the bigger picture.. i suppose only a few people have the same sort of ability as myself but that's nothing new.. let me simplify things for yall - bradley is overrated and yall are creating a false hype around him.. he could easily have 4 losses on his record against fighters who arent even natural welterweights.. he'd have a fifth loss if he had the balls to face khan at 140..

bradley sort of a gatekeeper type boxer now at 147, just like berto? can't be considered elite, but not a total bum. got away with a few gift decisions like berto did but turns out he's not as good as some thought. possibly a gatekeeper test for upcoming 147 boxers like khan, broner, thurman, maidana, porter etc.. No, you just want to discredit Pac's win over a p4p #3 fighter. He would probably beat all the fighters you mentioned. Try again Floyd Fanboy.

:?!:You said, "Bradley is practically a journeyman at this point". So I asked you, "then wtf is Khan"? Now who's retarded again?? I didn't say you were retarded - but with this post, you are coming close to looking like it. I was being sarcastic, my butthurt child of a fellow poster. Go back and read the posts I did early in this thread and you can see I was saying it was rubbish. :op:

I think that is a harsh assessment. Bradley's legacy will always be stained for ducking "that chinny guy", but even if you factor out the Pacquiao fight he did beat some serious talent. all those fights were real close though - even his fight with Junior Witter was SD, Marquez was SD, Prov needed 1 round on 2 scorecards to win.. and pac beat him twice too.. but those other fights bradley basically showed he was around the same level as the other boxers, not actually better than them.. he was just lucky with the judges on those nights

Adrien "Berto Reincarnated" Broner Bradley is just a local bum, BERTO GOAT "AB" = Another Berto

if bradley was the new berto then we will see floyd picking pac by the end of the year pac just beat berto YEAHHHH.......

No, Bradley is not the next Berto. I did feel he lost both fights agains't Pac. I would still like to see Bradley vs Prov 2. Berto even though he loses the guy comes to fight win lose or draw. I don't dislike Berto at all the guy is always in exciting fights. Like fights with Collazo,Ortiz and Soto Karass.

You Khan fans really hate Bradley don't you? I'm a fan of Berto, and don't really like Bradley and even I admit they are different levels. Bradley is clearly a top fighter, I felt he fought 3 razor close fights with JMM and Pacquiao, two ATG's of his time. Berto lost to Ortiz, Guerrero and Karrass.

Broner is the new Berto. If anything I think Berto is the more talented and powerful boxer and you saw how that turned out.

LMAO, Bradley is back at the bottom of the trash heap already huh? One loss to Pac and he's done. That is like comparing Pac to Ortiz or something like that when you really think about it..... :headbang::headbang::headbang:

You guys are dumber than dirt. Go back and read my posts. :spankme: :?!:You said, "Bradley is practically a journeyman at this point". So I asked you, "then wtf is Khan"? Now who's retarded again??

LMAO, Bradley is back at the bottom of the trash heap already huh? One loss to Pac and he's done. That is like comparing Pac to Ortiz or something like that when you really think about it.....

Bradley and Berto shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence. Unless you're talking about boxers whose last names start with the letter "B".

bradley sort of a gatekeeper type boxer now at 147, just like berto? can't be considered elite, but not a total bum. got away with a few gift decisions like berto did but turns out he's not as good as some thought. possibly a gatekeeper test for upcoming 147 boxers like khan, broner, thurman, maidana, porter etc.. The only similarity between Berto and Bradley are they are dark. Real dark. Not Clottey dark though. Even Charlie Murphy and Wesley Snipes are surprised how dark Clottey is.

I think that is a harsh assessment. Bradley's legacy will always be stained for ducking "that chinny guy", but even if you factor out the Pacquiao fight he did beat some serious talent.

hell no bradley can actually box and moves his head wtf?