I don't think Floyd has ever done it.
Canelo, no
Guererro, please
Cotto, top fighter but after the beatings he took from Pacquiao and Margarito he was someway past his prime.
Ortiz, don't make me laugh.
Mosley, about 7 years or more past his prime.
Marquez, past prime and bloated at the weight having jump 3 weights in a year at the age of 35.
Hatton, prime but not on Bradley's level.
Oscar, part time boxer.
Baldomir, don't be so stupid.
Has Floyd ever done it, to my recollection he hasn't
I don't think Floyd has ever done it.
Canelo, no
Guererro, please
Cotto, top fighter but after the beatings he took from Pacquiao and Margarito he was someway past his prime.
Ortiz, don't make me laugh.
Mosley, about 7 years or more past his prime.
Marquez, past prime and bloated at the weight having jump 3 weights in a year at the age of 35.
Hatton, prime but not on Bradley's level.
Oscar, part time boxer.
Baldomir, don't be so stupid.
Has Floyd ever done it, to my recollection he hasn't
Well maybe they are some in a lesser degree like their common opponents but we all know Pac how easily disposed them.
Agreed, good points. I'm not sure he had a choice with Provodnikov. I tend to believe that Provodnikov forced Bradley Into a slugfest as opposed to Bradley's claim that he Intentionally engaged Provodnikov In order to prove a point. I also believe Bradley could and would win a rematch If he decided to stick to boxing.
In the Provodnikov fight he was trying to prove a point and almost lost because of it. He should've known not to do that with Pac. Pac's defense is much better than Provodnikov's and he's better skill wise. I do think Timmy learned a valuable lesson last night, stick to the game plan.
This fight should happen again. Tim was doing well until he abandoned his game plan like he did Saturday night. You would think he knows he's a boxer and not a brawler by his knockout ratio.
Agreed, good points. I'm not sure he had a choice with Provodnikov. I tend to believe that Provodnikov forced Bradley Into a slugfest as opposed to Bradley's claim that he Intentionally engaged Provodnikov In order to prove a point. I also believe Bradley could and would win a rematch If he decided to stick to boxing.
Would a rematch look the same If Bradley decided to fight the way he did against Marquez? I agree he was battered In there first meeting but I think Bradley looks better If he changes his style In the rematch. Then again Provodnikov put him In a position where he had to trade. This Is a fight that needs to happen again
This fight should happen again. Tim was doing well until he abandoned his game plan like he did Saturday night. You would think he knows he's a boxer and not a brawler by his knockout ratio.
Floyd has beat fighters much better and dominating then Bradley. Diego Corrales was a destroyer in his prime, 37 year-old Mosley and 33 year-old De la Hoya would are better then Bradley. What am I even defending Mayweathers resume for he is leagues better then Bradley and has beaten many better fighters. Hell Zab Judah could probably beat Bradley.
Ruslan a C- fighter on his besy day almost took Bradley off the face of the earth. I mean did that fight not happen?
Would a rematch look the same If Bradley decided to fight the way he did against Marquez? I agree he was battered In there first meeting but I think Bradley looks better If he changes his style In the rematch. Then again Provodnikov put him In a position where he had to trade. This Is a fight that needs to happen again
Ruslan a C- fighter on his besy day almost took Bradley off the face of the earth. I mean did that fight not happen?
How is Ruslan a C- fighter? the guy is a champion at 140, brutalized Mike Alvarado who was coming off the Rios win and arguably beat Herrera (who recently outboxed Danny Garcia). Bradley beat him and despite a bad gameplan, put another feather on his cap.
Corrales got outboxed by Clottey... and got dropped by numerous journeymen throughout his career. Also like I showed you Bradley's (RING #3/ ESPN #3 / BS #4 P4P) resume is much better.
I love how Corralles resume gets the "extra" breakdown. Your agenda is clear as day. Ruslan almost took Bradleys life in the ring. I mean seriously let that sink in. Who the fucc do you people think you are kidding?
I broke down Bradley's resume saying he should have lost to Pac and that Casamayor was faded when Bradley fought him.
What else do you want me to say? "The truth is the truth and the truth hurts (apparently)."
I love how Corralles resume gets the "extra" breakdown. Your agenda is clear as day. Ruslan almost took Bradleys life in the ring. I mean seriously let that sink in. Who the fucc do you people think you are kidding?
Yes. Bradley beats Porter. Porter is wild and overly aggressive. TB has good movement and is much faster and has better defense. He wins a decision. Porter is going to beat Paulie though. What tool this guy Paulie is. LoL. He said recently that he would beat Manny. Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
Porter is gonna beat Paulie. It's a known fact Paulie doesn't like Manny but Manny at 25% beats Paulie
um the corrales fight probably is better than the Bradley win. Corrales was a beast.
Bradley's resume sh*ts on Corrales:
Pacquiao (should have lost 116-112)
Juan Manuel Marquez
Miguel Vazquez
Devon Alexander
Ruslan Provodnikov
Lamont Peterson
Kendal Holt
Junior Witter
Joel Casamayor (very faded)
Luis Abregu
Corrales' resume:
Casamayor (SD robbery; Casamayor KO'd him and got the right verdict in the third fight)
JL Castillo (Castillo KO4 in rematch)
Acelino Freitas
Derrick Gainer (average fighter)
Angel Manfredy (average fighter, never won a title)
Lost to: Clottey by UD, Casamayor TKO/SD, Castillo KO4, Mayweather TKO10
Bradley is a C-level fighter?
Look at the man's resume:
Juan Manuel Marquez
Miguel Vazquez
Devon Alexander
Ruslan Provodnikov
Lamont Peterson
Kendal Holt
Junior Witter
Joel Casamayor (very faded)
Luis Abregu
I bet you think Castillo and Corrales are ATG's because Floyd fought them. Lol, both their resumes are sh*t compared to Bradley's.
I assume you're being a smart ass by the Castillo and Corrales statement. If I thought they well HOFer's, it wouldn't be because Floyd fought them. That's just my opinion. To me Bradley really isn't that good. He uses his head and rough house tactics to get by
Yes.......
Yes. Bradley beats Porter. Porter is wild and overly aggressive. TB has good movement and is much faster and has better defense. He wins a decision. Porter is going to beat Paulie though. What tool this guy Paulie is. LoL. He said recently that he would beat Manny. Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, he lost to Ruslan as well. His conditioning, level of opposition, and defense makes him a B Level fighter. He is damn near a HOF'mer already. One more BIG win and Bradley is flirting with the HOF
He lost to PAC both times, clearly. The first fight counts as a win but that fight should be erased from the books if their going to give him that win. I think you have to look at the time he and Marquez fought, Marquez wasn't prime. Do you think Bradley will beat Porter?
To be honest I like Bradley but he's a C level fighter at best. Pac beat him
8-4 the first fight 9-3 on Saturday. He went life and death with his last four fights.
The number 3 P4P fighter In the world In most peoples opinions Is a c level fighter? You are not hiding your attempt to discredit Pacquiaos accomplishment of beating a top prime p4p fighter very well.
To be honest I like Bradley but he's a C level fighter at best. Pac beat him
8-4 the first fight 9-3 on Saturday. He went life and death with his last four fights.
Bradley is a C-level fighter?
Look at the man's resume:
Juan Manuel Marquez
Miguel Vazquez
Devon Alexander
Ruslan Provodnikov
Lamont Peterson
Kendal Holt
Junior Witter
Joel Casamayor (very faded)
Luis Abregu
I bet you think Castillo and Corrales are ATG's because Floyd fought them. Lol, both their resumes are sh*t compared to Bradley's.