Most pointless fight out there!!

The second one, lol. By the way, you posting style seems familiar: are you an ALT? This is my first and only account. Im new to the forum but have been visiting the site since before Rome fell. Out of curiosity whose style seems similar to mine?

So many articles that ive been offered 5m dollars to fight, i would just like to clarify my team have not been offered anything.. #AllTalk— Amir Khan (@AmirKingKhan) February 28, 2014 Kel work your way up to world class level. If you need an opponent the local shop keeper won***39;t mind making a few quid. Can get him licensed— Amir Khan (@AmirKingKhan) February 28, 2014 The second one, lol. By the way, you posting style seems familiar: are you an ALT?

So many articles that ive been offered 5m dollars to fight, i would just like to clarify my team have not been offered anything.. #AllTalk— Amir Khan (@AmirKingKhan) February 28, 2014 Kel work your way up to world class level. If you need an opponent the local shop keeper won***39;t mind making a few quid. Can get him licensed— Amir Khan (@AmirKingKhan) February 28, 2014

I disagree. The only one trying to cash out is Brook by fighting Khan. All hes done to keep his career relevant is use Khan. Hes been mandatory for WBO then IBF titles for past 3 years yet never enforced them and i wonder why? Maybe they know they cant win it. So they wanna cash out in a Khan fight. Khan should fight U.S based names like Porter, AB and even Guerrero seems alright. Yeah but khan ain't getting 5 million for porter, broner, etc... It's a crazy offer from hearns but khan won't see that money unless he fights Floyd or manny

If Eddie hearns is actually gonna pay khan 5+ million, then it's a no brainier that khan fights him.. It's a huge payday, but gbp will probably keep khan in house and cash him out vs their other name fighters I disagree. The only one trying to cash out is Brook by fighting Khan. All hes done to keep his career relevant is use Khan. Hes been mandatory for WBO then IBF titles for past 3 years yet never enforced them and i wonder why? Maybe they know they cant win it. So they wanna cash out in a Khan fight. Khan should fight U.S based names like Porter, AB and even Guerrero seems alright.

Mayweather vs Maidana is pretty pointless.

Khan put'em in his place. All hes done is yap Khan's name to stay relevant. 31 fight and not even a world title. Wonder why he has never enforced his mandatory shots.

So Diaz and Molina were worthy but not Alexander and Brooks? Did you not read the thread title before posting? i bet you didnt because i explained this very point in there. Since its too much ill write it out for you again. Molina: tune up after a KO loss Diaz: former world champ who drew with Porter a fight before Brook: never was world champ, never attempted, not known in U.S and out of 31 wins who the hell besides Senchenko stands out? Khan is looking for a win that legitimizes his candidacy for Floyd vs Porter, A.B hell even throw Guerrero in there.

Amir Khan has been offered a big $ fight vs Kell Brook and some jokers here are saying Khan is even ducking that. Reasons why its a useless fight for Khan: 1) Out of Brook's 31 wins the biggest name is Senchenko? 2) Has never won or even been in a world title fight. Yet wants Khan? sad 3) Didnt enforce(ducked) mandatory title shots vs Alexander/Bradley. 4) A win wont mean a career boost as ppl will say "Brook was a hype job" 5) 31 fights each and a combined record of their opponents: Khan - Wins 719, Losses 157 Brook - Wins 622, Losses 917 6) Not known in U.S. apart from oh yes his debut vs GOAT Luis Galarza. Conclusion: Brook fight is big money, but Khan wants to become a stronger candidate to Floyd and beating Brook who hasnt even won a title means jack. Khan at that level doesnt need an eliminator for a shot. As for if Diaz/Molina are better? Diaz was atleast a world champ who drew with Porter a fight before and Molina was just a tuneup after a KO loss. Why is Kell Brook not fighting a champion or even attempted to win a title? Are they not even confident in winning a belt? Khan atleast had star power to call for a Mayweather fight and if you pretend he doesnt well you were all pi$sed he may get it so thats proof. A win vs Porter raises Khan's stock because of the belt and Porter being a name in U.S. Also A.B who is the new Andre Berto. If Eddie hearns is actually gonna pay khan 5+ million, then it's a no brainier that khan fights him.. It's a huge payday, but gbp will probably keep khan in house and cash him out vs their other name fighters

So Diaz and Molina were worthy but not Alexander and Brooks? Let's not try and jump on our high horse when you're Floyd's biggest fanboy eh. Your hero has done the same many a time so before you go around accusing others of what the man your life revolves around has been doing his whole career, try and be a bit rational for once in your life.

So Diaz and Molina were worthy but not Alexander and Brooks? We all know what those fights were. Khan is looking for a bigger fight now. Going from being promised a fight with Mayweather to facing Kell Brook is a bit of a comedown. Although the money is very good so he should seriously consider it.

So Diaz and Molina were worthy but not Alexander and Brooks?

A Khan fan complaining about someone not deserving a fight? :lol1: Try reading what i wrote i know it may be too much but just try it okay. The emphasis is Floyd contention and that is the context being implied here. Realistically where does beating Brook put Khan in Floyd contention? Is Brook better than Porter? or even A.B?

Khan should fight Thurman. If he beat him he would almost certainly get a Mayweather fight.

Slight difference being that Khan didn't deserve a fight against the Pound for Pound number 1. Brook doesn't deserve a fight against Amir Khan, the worst boxer in the history of the universe across every single galaxy in the stratosphere. Basically.

titles dont mean ****. not that khan has 1 either by the way. the only title that matters is the lineal title. the only champion at welterweight is mayweather. the rest are just contenders with belts. khan does not deserve a mayweather fight. he got chinned off danny fcuking garcia! lol. so khan vs brook sounds like a good fight to me. porter? c'mon, you wouldnt be mentioning him if he didnt have a meaningless "title". So when its not your favorite fighter alphabet titles dont mean jack? Mayweather is the only champion, but the closest to that is holding a version of a title, which by beating Brook isnt achievable. You are damn right i wouldnt have mentioned Porter if he didnt have a belt instead whoever was holding it because having one or more automatically ascends you in to legitimacy and warrants that you can challenge big names. Hence the desperation of promoters to manipulate rankings. What are you even trying to say? Kell Brook is a better fighter than Porter? So if Khan beats Brook would you be okay if he calls out Mayweather because for people like you hes now a more legit candidate compared to before? or beating Porter a known U.S name with a belt make his position stronger?

herrera-garcia garcia gets the biggest win of his career over matthysse and it's matthysse who is has been rumored to fight either broner, maidana(can mark this out) or keith thurman

Now you are talking about 2 different things. Highlighting Brook's shortcomings doesnt do anything to hide Khan's. Khan just needs to shut his mouth and take a competitive fight at 147. His hands can shut everyone up. I definitely agree but at 147 he should get a win over Porter and AB as it means more than Kell Brook.

How are they more credible? Alexander lost to Bradley, Porter and even Kotelnik. Broner has 2 fights at 147, 1 loss and 1 win that many taught he lost. Brook is the biggest fight for Khan and the hardest. Brook is better than Alexander? Broner? Atleast those two have won multiple world titles and are a known name. Neither of which Brooks has. If those two had Brook's opponents they wouldve been undefeated too.