What would you rank Floyd if he finished his career out like this?

Like it would matter Larry, its about opponents and the quality of wins not a bunch a paper belts which Floyd admitted just collect dust. Much love for this post Floyd ranks in the top 25/30

Assuming he wins all these fights. Fights maidana in May gets the WBA already has WBC and ring titles Fights khan vs porter winner if they fought captures the ibf Fights manny or bradley winner for wbo? Where would you rank him all time wise And how do you think these fights would play out? Manny is so far past his sell by date already, that waiting another year just means 3 farcical fights in a row. Standard stuff for floyd.

He would be top 2 and replace Henry Armstrong as the 2nd best of all time. When I saw this post ^ http://ist2-2.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/2/2/4/3/22438/1/I/n/X/1InXX/AceVentura2.gif

I don't think he's top 40 as it stands and 2 garbage ass wins plus a win over a shot to pieces Pac does absolutely nothing for him.

All time wise, he is definitely top 50. Due to all the fighters he has ducked and those he ducked during their prime but fought when they were older, I can't rank him higher than 30. If he fights Pacquiao, he would be a solid 25. He never tested and made his skills shine against true opposition like Pacquiao did. It just can't be a coincidence he didn't fight Margarito, Williams and Oscar for a second time and now Manny for all these years. Khan being Floyd's number one and only choice for May 3rd just sums up Floyd's mindset I'm fighting the best in the world.

I'd regard him as the best fighter who never was. He doesn't have that fight that defined the greats. He doesn't have Ali facing Foreman, he doesn't have Leonard facing Hagler. It's those fights where victory was far from certain, that the greats wanted and defined them.

I can already tell you dropped out of high school. :haha: :haha: BUNGALOWS dropping haymakers on these fools. lmao u ppl are freakin sad

All time wise, he is definitely top 50. Due to all the fighters he has ducked and those he ducked during their prime but fought when they were older, I can't rank him higher than 30. If he fights Pacquiao, he would be a solid 25. He never tested and made his skills shine against true opposition like Pacquiao did. Who were these again??

Sorry about the mistake. I meant to say I expect Pacquiao to beat Bradley in the rematch.

I would rank him as a greedy selfish piece of sh*t if he fights at 147 for the next two years and does not step down from the titles he owns at 154. I would not rank him any higher than I do now unless he beats Pacquiao who I expect to be Bradley. If he beats Pacquiao he goes higher. I rank him as one of the 5 or 6 best welterweights in history along with Robinson, Hearns, Leonard, Trinidad and Napoles. He would also rank at or near the top guys in the history of 130,135 and 140 pound champions. I don't rank him at all at 154 because all he did was beat fat little Cotto and Canelo at a catchweight of 152.

I can already tell you dropped out of high school. :haha: :haha: BUNGALOWS dropping haymakers on these fools.

wait for a guy to age and decline when you're 2 years older. That sounds pretty ****ing retarded to me. I can already tell you dropped out of high school.

That's horrible. I'm only giving Floyd til the end of this year for the Manny fight, otherwise it doesn't matter anymore. It doesn't matter at this point anyways, but still, Manny's his only real threat @ WW, but enough's, enough. You can't postpone something forever, and act like it's still the same thing. There's a limit to how long you duck, and wait for the other guy to age and decline. That's just common sense. That would do absolutely nothing for his legacy. wait for a guy to age and decline when you're 2 years older. That sounds pretty ****ing retarded to me.

This is what is looks like will happen,seems like he will try and unify the 147 division...who was the last fighter to do this?

Top 35-40. He will never be top 20 for me. Too many greats at the beginning to be there. He is number one in terms of skill for me though.

All time wise, he is definitely top 50. Due to all the fighters he has ducked and those he ducked during their prime but fought when they were older, I can't rank him higher than 30. If he fights Pacquiao, he would be a solid 25. He never tested and made his skills shine against true opposition like Pacquiao did.

That's horrible. I'm only giving Floyd til the end of this year for the Manny fight, otherwise it doesn't matter anymore. It doesn't matter at this point anyways, but still, Manny's his only real threat @ WW, but enough's, enough. You can't postpone something forever, and act like it's still the same thing. There's a limit to how long you duck, and wait for the other guy to age and decline. That's just common sense. That would do absolutely nothing for his legacy.