Video: This guy takes his love for Mayweather to the extreme

So let me get this straight some loser made a video subliminally taking the pee out of Floyd stans, but in reality he himself is a Bizzaro stan. While some spend their days defending Floyd, this guy has dedicated his life to dissing Floyd and his stans You are one in the same http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llo4z4ENki1qbqk6w.jpg Why don't all of you fan boys get together and have rough sex This lady is 50 years old and sounds like a typical black power flowmo most flowmos are racially biased flowmos

lol I had to stop listening 5 seconds in

Dstyle is the biggest cornball on YouTube **** that puto

no, im saying he has yet to prove his level of skill. the comment wasnt as much directed at making like of golovkin as making it seem like alexander was some skilless bum whilst golovkin exudes the best skills in the world. u guys are just focusing on one part of what i said. Like devon by clearly losing 8+ rounds to guys like Kotelnik? Dont be ridiculous. Golovkin is right now where devon was right before he fought bradley except he didnt easily get handled by macklin. Apparently you need to lose to guys in the lower 10 ranks to be considered "Skilled" because dominating guys just doesnt do it

based on??? your definition of skill??? u are basically doing the same thing u accuse the other side of doing. golovkin has the more appealing style, no doubt. but lets not get carried away. alexander is a 2 division champ. and he has beaten some good fighters and even in fights he has lost, he hasnt been dominated. he has skills. Which great fighters has devon beaten? Witter was a pretty good win but he was coming off a Bradley loss and it was for a vacant belt. His other belt was against Bailey for god sakes in one of historys most boring fights. Maidana is simply a contender. Macklin was at the level of devons best win and was steamrolled.

Nothing wrong with Larry expressing his feelings.

has golovkin proven hes more than a brawler? if so who was this against? say what u want about alexander, but hes fought some of the best fighters out and hes never really been dominated. Devon lost 3X as many rounds as he won to a macklin type opponent in Kotelink and then proceeded to clearly lose his next 2 fights to Bradley and Lucas. I thought the devon myth has been busted years ago

So let me get this straight some loser made a video subliminally taking the pee out of Floyd stans, but in reality he himself is a Bizzaro stan. While some spend their days defending Floyd, this guy has dedicated his life to dissing Floyd and his stans You are one in the same http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llo4z4ENki1qbqk6w.jpg Why don't all of you fan boys get together and have rough sex

Nice vid hectari. Next time you make a vid have the balls to say you made it instead of acting like you didn't.

This dude Dempseyrollin has no credibility when he said GGG was a brawler. Brawlers don't win that many Ammy fights, most brawlers suck in ams, a brawler is someone like Librado Andrade. I bet you if GGG was black he would be called methodical and calculated intelligent pressure fighter who doesn't waste his punches and puts intelligent pressure on. yea beacause the only fighters i like are black rite?? in fact i dislike all non black fighters. my post proves so, which is why carlos monzon is my favorite fighter of all time, right? tell me some more about my preference for "black fighters". dont get it twisted,im american, ill ride with american fighters all day in nationalistic type threads. but i do not like all "black" fighters and many of my favortie fighters are neither black or american

Welll... That was awkward... But based on how defensive and emotional some people get on this forum, it wouldn't surprise me at ALL if they were really like that. I swear, for some people if you said that their favorite fighter was going to war, they'd tell you that they're too skilled for a bunch of soldiers with guns or some weird **** like that.

This dude Dempseyrollin has no credibility when he said GGG was a brawler. Brawlers don't win that many Ammy fights, most brawlers suck in ams, a brawler is someone like Librado Andrade. I bet you if GGG was black he would be called methodical and calculated intelligent pressure fighter who doesn't waste his punches and puts intelligent pressure on.

What does Alexander do that is particularly skillful? He is heavily reliant on his physical gifts. He's very predictable offensively. He's not hard to hit. His footwork is awful. He doesn't adjust. When he fought fighters who could handle his speed and clinching, he lost, and we're not talking about great fighters he lost to. Kotelnik was decent, and Bradley and Matthysse are good. All three clearly beat him. He has a pretty good chin and a lot of speed. That's the main reason he got where he is. alexanders footwork isnt horrible, not great but not horrible. he has fast hand speed, uses it to his advantage, he knows when to move, when to stay still, hes not hard to hit, but neither is he overly easy to hit either. most of all, he knows when to clinch, which is a skill btw, ask khan. alexanders physical gifts are not that amazing. he doesnt have knockout power, he doesnt have amazing hand speed and his reflexes are decent. yet hes not a brawler, and hes never been dominated and hes actually the only fighter so far that has completely shut out marcos maidana in a fight. seriously its easy to pick and choose what any fighter doesnt do and its obvious u dont appreciate alexander and im not a big fan either, but the kid has a good level of skill, which is why hes been considered a top fighter in 2 divisions already. and btw, kotelnik did not clearly beat alexander. that was a very close fight.

based on??? your definition of skill??? u are basically doing the same thing u accuse the other side of doing. golovkin has the more appealing style, no doubt. but lets not get carried away. alexander is a 2 division champ. and he has beaten some good fighters and even in fights he has lost, he hasnt been dominated. he has skills. What does Alexander do that is particularly skillful? He is heavily reliant on his physical gifts. He's very predictable offensively. He's not hard to hit. His footwork is awful. He doesn't adjust. When he fought fighters who could handle his speed and clinching, he lost, and we're not talking about great fighters he lost to. Kotelnik was decent, and Bradley and Matthysse are good. All three clearly beat him. He has a pretty good chin and a lot of speed. That's the main reason he got where he is.

He moves forward behind a really good jab, has good accuracy, is maybe the best right now at cutting off the ring, and throws just about every punch in the book. How do you not watch him and see the skill? He sure as hell has more skill than Alexander, who relies on handspeed, footspeed, and clinching. based on??? your definition of skill??? u are basically doing the same thing u accuse the other side of doing. golovkin has the more appealing style, no doubt. but lets not get carried away. alexander is a 2 division champ. and he has beaten some good fighters and even in fights he has lost, he hasnt been dominated. he has skills.

he proves he has devastating power every fight, sure. his skills tho? in the two fights in which fighters stood up to his power, he didnt exactly wow with his skill. not saying he isnt skillful but until he fights someone on par with himself it remains to be seen how skillful he is. making alexander the butt of a joke is kinda lame because it implies he doesnt have skill, when he does and hes fought ppl that prove that at least, which is more than golovkin has done at this point. He moves forward behind a really good jab, has good accuracy, is maybe the best right now at cutting off the ring, and throws just about every punch in the book. How do you not watch him and see the skill? He sure as hell has more skill than Alexander, who relies on handspeed, footspeed, and clinching.

you really think GGG is just a brawler? some kind of non-dimensional slug like Mayorga? no, im saying he has yet to prove his level of skill. the comment wasnt as much directed at making like of golovkin as making it seem like alexander was some skilless bum whilst golovkin exudes the best skills in the world. u guys are just focusing on one part of what i said.

He proves it every fight. What do you mean? he proves he has devastating power every fight, sure. his skills tho? in the two fights in which fighters stood up to his power, he didnt exactly wow with his skill. not saying he isnt skillful but until he fights someone on par with himself it remains to be seen how skillful he is. making alexander the butt of a joke is kinda lame because it implies he doesnt have skill, when he does and hes fought ppl that prove that at least, which is more than golovkin has done at this point.

He proves it every fight. What do you mean? Booyah. Great rebuttal.

has golovkin proven hes more than a brawler? if so who was this against? say what u want about alexander, but hes fought some of the best fighters out and hes never really been dominated. He proves it every fight. What do you mean?