Malignagi should have won.

thought it was a half decent fight but with all the trash talk is was just an average fight in my opinion.

Paulie had a good statagy. I give him credit for that. If he would have thrown more right hands to the head he would have won. I don't see anyway how he won more than 5 rounds only hitting arms/shoulders. Broner landed every significant punch of every round.

did you even watch the fight? paulie didn't land anything, paulie was running, bronner was smashing his face in and blocking everything. body punches don't count? c'mon man. broner wasn't able to do sh*t until paulie started tiring. and even then this offensive juggernaut you speak of couldn't drop or stop the champ.

I cant stand Broner but I couldnt give Paulie the win and I really wanted to. 5 rounds max, probably 4.

paulie kept letting broner take rounds in the last 20 seconds all night long

ya what rounds did paulie win guys? you seem to be so sure he won what exact rounds did he win?

I thought Broner clearly won, but it was close. Can't imagine scoring more than 5 rounds for Paulie.

Man i swear ppl need to learn how to score fights. No way paulie won that fight. Its not even plausible. Broner looked like crap but he clearly won. Smh. I dunno if its the hate or what, but ppl have went full retard on this. Funny thing is just about every press score has broner winning clearly. ya funny how no one mentions the press are they fixed scores to paulie?

broner landed the harder shots but was he really all that effective? malignaggi fought at his own pace the entire fight and his offense minimized broner's to a small fraction of the fight. broner didn't light him up anytime he wanted because he couldn't, so i'd say malignaggi's activity was pretty effective. snapping your opponent's head back one or twice in a 3 minute round where you did little else isn't what i would call effective, especially when your opponent is fighting back. did you even watch the fight? paulie didn't land anything, paulie was running, bronner was smashing his face in and blocking everything.

Broner is an overrated hypejob.. dont change the fact he won the fight people seem to be getting the 2 confused

Malignaggi's head snapped back at least ten times around after rd 4. What were you guys watching? Being active doesn't win you fights. Being effective does. I hate using compubox as a tool to score anything, but just look at the number of power shots landed betwen the two, and on top of that, the powershots Broner landed were much harder. broner landed the harder shots but was he really all that effective? malignaggi fought at his own pace the entire fight and his offense minimized broner's to a small fraction of the fight. broner didn't light him up anytime he wanted because he couldn't, so i'd say malignaggi's activity was pretty effective. snapping your opponent's head back one or twice in a 3 minute round where you did little else isn't what i would call effective, especially when your opponent is fighting back.

Well thats how people always say to beat the shell, pound on the arms and shoulders, and he was landing to the body, and connecting with his jab. I still think he lost, but it shouldn't have even been a close fight. Agreed. Good post.

I had it 1-2 rounds for Broner but Ref should have deducted points so potentially a draw it was closer than I had expected since everyone had Broner to wipe out Paulie. Tom Schreck with 117-111 paid off.

I had Broner winning 115-114, but I honestly feel like a draw would have been the most appropriate outcome, as Broner was contending for the belt here. 117-111 was terrible. That judge should never be called on again.

Man i swear ppl need to learn how to score fights. No way paulie won that fight. Its not even plausible. Broner looked like crap but he clearly won. Smh. I dunno if its the hate or what, but ppl have went full retard on this. Funny thing is just about every press score has broner winning clearly. I'm tired of your trolling. Ignored

Man i swear ppl need to learn how to score fights. No way paulie won that fight. Its not even plausible. Broner looked like crap but he clearly won. Smh. I dunno if its the hate or what, but ppl have went full retard on this. Funny thing is just about every press score has broner winning clearly.

Malignaggi's head snapped back at least ten times around after rd 4. What were you guys watching? Being active doesn't win you fights. Being effective does. I hate using compubox as a tool to score anything, but just look at the number of power shots landed betwen the two, and on top of that, the powershots Broner landed were much harder.

even during broner's moments, malignaggi fought back and landed his own punches. he wasn't completely dominated in those exchanges. paulie throwing and landing a bunch of weak punches > broner posing, talking and doing nothing

Which is why he won 4 rds. Otherwise, when Broner threw at all, it was decisive. Is that why PM was able to respond in bunches to whatever Broner threw? Sounds like you were only scoring Broner's shots giving the 4 rounds to Paulie in the rounds when Broner didn't throw at all.

Malignaggi won 4 rds tops. People are getting far too excited about punches landing on the arms and shoulders. Well thats how people always say to beat the shell, pound on the arms and shoulders, and he was landing to the body, and connecting with his jab. I still think he lost, but it shouldn't have even been a close fight.