Anybody else thought Trout beat Canelo?

We are hearing now from a lot of people that Floyd vs Canelo is "the fight of the century". Well, I see it like this: Canelo never fought a prime, top opponent until Trout, so Trout was the first BIG test for him; and on my scorecard Trout won this fight. Only by 1 point, but still he won. So - Floyd vs Canelo can be sold by the media as such a big fight for only one reason: because both have a lot of PPV buyers. Anybody wanting to tell me Canelo is a top 40 p4p fighter at this point has got to be joking. I see it like this: Canelo is physically bigger than Floyd, actually he is the first natural light middleweight Floyd will be facing (Oscar and Cotto came from much lower weight classes when they fought Floyd at 154). But as far as I am concerned, Canelo is a good fighter who never fought ANYBODY in his prime except Trout who he lost to.