Why all the hate on Adrian broner?????

because he's a moron who beats up old ladies and likes to lick the p.ussies of STD infested prostitutes and then post the videos online he also loves to fight pillowfisted midgets, has already gotten two gift decissions and is currently ducking the entire 140 division to fight a washed up pillowfisted Malignaggi

the same ignorant people who hate on canelo, are the ones who defend broner. you know who you are...........

WHen he twittered mexicans are w_t backs that was before a fight with a mexican so I assume he was trying to get in the head of his opponent.Going down on a stripper and not making weight is not trash talking and isn' relevant to the thread discussion. WHether you think Broner is scum is fine. Regarding my post-he and froch both talk trash so if its acceptable when froch does it it should be acceptable when broner does it. The difference between how they do it is nothing more than a reflection of where they grew up , whom they associated with, and how they as a group "play the dozens" with one another. "Trying to get in the head of an opponent???? Man you are grabbing at straws! He wasn't even addressing the opponent, he called Mexicans Wet-backs, he didn't call his opponent a Wet-Back!! And going down on a stripper, etc., is relevant because that is another part of his fuked up character. Again, Froch talks and backs it up fighting the BEST!! Broner talks SHT and then signs to fight a guy EVERY TOP FIGHTER AT 135/140/147 would be favored to beat!!! HUGE DIFFERENCE!!

SO in other words-no I didn't say anything when manny and ghost did the same thing because I like manny and am nuetral on ghost. But since I don't like Broner and wont be honest about why (because I will get banned), I'm going to criticize anything he does and try to make that criticism seem valid.You still don't get it! Pac taking on Oscar who was HUGELY favored to be him is NOT the same as Broner cherry picking Pauli who HE is hugely favored to beat! That is the OPPOSITE! NO ONE saw Oscar as a cherry pick by Manny and the odds showed that! Your ability to discern obvious differences is borderline retarded.

Lmao yea a anorexic Oscar and a tailor made busted up by Floyd hatton were real threats for manny hu lmao even tho he's a weak puncher Pauline can outbox most the guys at 140 and he's one of the title holders at 147 so your point is irrelevant if ur trying to compare the division jumping.You don't get it! Oscar did not indicate what weight he would come in at for Pac so your comment is lame as hell with 20/20 hindsight. And Pauli could not even impress against Cano and was also beaten by that same Hatton that Floyd busted up. Give it up, comparing Broner's cherry picking of Pauli does NOT compare to Pac taking on 2 guys, one of which was HUGELY favored to beat him. Pauli would have to be HUGELY favored to beat Broner to compare here. You have no point at all.

The kid from HBO back in the day?

I have no problem with Broner or his persona. I tend to care less what fighters say and focus almost exclusive on what they do. So far Broner looks like a significant asset to the sport of boxing. He's quickly becoming a big name, and he seems to be interested in fighting other big name fighters. If, however, he stops wanting to fight the best fighters in the world, and instead tries to simply sell himself in each and every fight, I will lose interest in Broner with a quickness. I respect fighters that understand that boxing is an entertainment business.

he was 21 ½ years old when he fought PDL. Still pretty young for his first big test regardless and especially against a crafty veteran and smart fighter like Ponce

Broner for a 23 Year Older Fighter? Has a Damn Good Resume AT HIS AGE! Dude was in the ring with a guys like Ponce De Leon at the age up 19-20 years old (regardless if you thought he lost that fight) Broner so far is backing up his trash talking and he is doing it in impressive fashion but yeah with the trash talking comes even higher expectations from Fans because they want to see him lose so bad they are going to want to see him against people THEY THINK can defeat him he was 21 ½ years old when he fought PDL.

Broner for a 23 Year Older Fighter? Has a Damn Good Resume AT HIS AGE! Dude was in the ring with a guys like Ponce De Leon at the age up 19-20 years old (regardless if you thought he lost that fight) Broner so far is backing up his trash talking and he is doing it in impressive fashion but yeah with the trash talking comes even higher expectations from Fans because they want to see him lose so bad they are going to want to see him against people THEY THINK can defeat him Wasn't demarco pose to give him the fit of his life??!???? Lol I swear people reach so bad on this site

I never disliked Floyd because of his arrogance / confidence because he backed it up against live competition early in his career. Many fans looked up highly to Floyd at that same time. Broner has yet to do anything close to that, so I think that's where most of the hate comes from on Broner more than people "Hating others with Confidence". Sometimes, people just don't like an douchebag. http://www.the-coli.com/images/smilies/manny.png Broner for a 23 Year Older Fighter? Has a Damn Good Resume AT HIS AGE! Dude was in the ring with a guys like Ponce De Leon at the age up 19-20 years old (regardless if you thought he lost that fight) Broner so far is backing up his trash talking and he is doing it in impressive fashion but yeah with the trash talking comes even higher expectations from Fans because they want to see him lose so bad they are going to want to see him against people THEY THINK can defeat him

But Floyd DID fight live guys early on in his career, and he was measured as a fighter based on those wins on top of his overall skill set. As for Broner, that's what fans are waiting to see from him on a consistent basis. Does a Malignaggi win really put him over the top? http://www.the-coli.com/images/smilies/what.png If he murders Pauli I don't think it hurts his career at all only help if u askin me .....guerroro went up to fight a whack as berto.....and that out him "over the top" why not the same for broner?

Ok it was a close fight n he won......u still have no point.....he won lol N like I said u can't deny his Gary russel or whoevers talent just cuz they ain't fought who u want them to in that case Floyd is garbage and has no talent cuz of who everybody says he hasn't fought and cotto n Oscar are the best ever since they fought everybody but lost.........no right. Judge him on who they fought and reality. What language is that?

Ok it was a close fight n he won......u still have no point.....he won lol N like I said u can't deny his Gary russel or whoevers talent just cuz they ain't fought who u want them to in that case Floyd is garbage and has no talent cuz of who everybody says he hasn't fought and cotto n Oscar are the best ever since they fought everybody but lost.........no right. Judge him on who they fought and reality. But Floyd DID fight live guys early on in his career, and he was measured as a fighter based on those wins on top of his overall skill set. As for Broner, that's what fans are waiting to see from him on a consistent basis. Does a Malignaggi win really put him over the top? http://www.the-coli.com/images/smilies/what.png

Ponce vs Broner was a close fight. Unless there's bias towards Ponce or Broner (which I have neither), I think its pretty unanimous that the fight could've gone either way depending on how you score fights. I'm judging Broner on the fact that he HASN'T fought much of anyone worth mentioning but talks as if he has, but that's not saying he isn't a good fighter either. I think Gary Russel is good too, but he hasn't fought anyone with a pulse either, that's just a reality. In Boxing, you're measured not only on your skills, but the level of opposition you face. If Broner went on to fight the Joe Schmo's of the world the rest of his career (which obviously I don't see him doing), are we to hold him in the same regard simply because he's a good Boxer negating the fact that he didn't fight anybody? Ok it was a close fight n he won......u still have no point.....he won lol N like I said u can't deny his Gary russel or whoevers talent just cuz they ain't fought who u want them to in that case Floyd is garbage and has no talent cuz of who everybody says he hasn't fought and cotto n Oscar are the best ever since they fought everybody but lost.........no right. Judge him on who they fought and reality.

Ok we'll you can't judge the dude on who he HASN'T fought what kind of **** is that even tho everybody on this site does it......you can day dream about fights he should've been in but be realistic and see what he has done in his actual fights......and u act like he got worked against ponce .......come on now Ponce vs Broner was a close fight. Unless there's bias towards Ponce or Broner (which I have neither), I think its pretty unanimous that the fight could've gone either way depending on how you score fights. I'm judging Broner on the fact that he HASN'T fought much of anyone worth mentioning but talks as if he has, but that's not saying he isn't a good fighter either. I think Gary Russel is good too, but he hasn't fought anyone with a pulse either, that's just a reality. In Boxing, you're measured not only on your skills, but the level of opposition you face. If Broner went on to fight the Joe Schmo's of the world the rest of his career (which obviously I don't see him doing), are we to hold him in the same regard simply because he's a good Boxer negating the fact that he didn't fight anybody?

Against sub par competition of course. He barely got passed the biggest name on his resume (Ponce De Leon). He's a good fighter, but still has a lot to prove against elite opposition. Floyd in his day talked a lot of sh*t, but by then he had victories over Corrales & Castillo which really sh*t all over anything Broner's done from 130-135lbs. Ok we'll you can't judge the dude on who he HASN'T fought what kind of **** is that even tho everybody on this site does it......you can day dream about fights he should've been in but be realistic and see what he has done in his actual fights......and u act like he got worked against ponce .......come on now

People who lack confidence...HATE PEOPLE WITH CONFIDENCE! Broner is a phenomenal young talent on his way to being a boxing SUPERSTAR and that also may piss some people off because their favorite up and coming fighters are not getting the same attention as Broner But ALL Al Haymon fighters are "HATED"! I never disliked Floyd because of his arrogance / confidence because he backed it up against live competition early in his career. Many fans looked up highly to Floyd at that same time. Broner has yet to do anything close to that, so I think that's where most of the hate comes from on Broner more than people "Hating others with Confidence". Sometimes, people just don't like an douchebag. http://www.the-coli.com/images/smilies/manny.png

Iono what You been watching but he's dam sure backed up every single ounce of **** talking in his fights ... Against sub par competition of course. He barely got passed the biggest name on his resume (Ponce De Leon). He's a good fighter, but still has a lot to prove against elite opposition. Floyd in his day talked a lot of sh*t, but by then he had victories over Corrales & Castillo which really sh*t all over anything Broner's done from 130-135lbs.

People who lack confidence...HATE PEOPLE WITH CONFIDENCE! Broner is a phenomenal young talent on his way to being a boxing SUPERSTAR and that also may piss some people off because their favorite up and coming fighters are not getting the same attention as Broner But ALL Al Haymon fighters are "HATED"! People who don't lick strippers aids infected ******* HATE people who do lick strippers aids infected *******.