Why would anyone talking about height and reach and not weight? Hearns was bigger than Mike Tyson if we go by height. :ugh:
If Tommy Hearns was a heavyweight then that might be a reasonable comparison.
Leonard was 3 inches taller with an 8 inch reach advantage. I think that would constitute 'bigger' for a lot of people.
Why would anyone talking about height and reach and not weight? Hearns was bigger than Mike Tyson if we go by height. :ugh:
Didn't seem like much of a difference to me.
Leonard was 3 inches taller with an 8 inch reach advantage. I think that would constitute 'bigger' for a lot of people.