Bradley won. Here's the proof...

Search on youtube: Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery And you will see that the commentating played a big part in making Manny look better than he actual did. Sure, careful editing can make even FMJ look bad. The question is, can even careful editing show that Bradley landed solid shots consistently? Heck, with selective editing, one can the Thunder NBA Champs. Since you like careful editing, here's one showing Pac consistently make Bradley look like a bobblehead. Whatcha got for Bradley? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAyV0p4KEd4&feature=youtube_gdata_player Owned

Is that what really happened to the entire fight? The video clearly shows Lampey was nut hugging Pacquaio but that is not the whole point. I watched the fight many times sound muted and when Pac or Bradley landed a punch, I freeze the video part, rewind, rewatch it in slow mo to see if the punch actually landed. Pac missing a lot of punches but so did Bradley because he was running and backpedaling the entire fight. Bradley tickling punches were missing and most were blocked by arms and gloves. Pac was actually landed clearly harder puches vs Bradley tickling punches. While both doing nothing for the first two minutes in every rounds Pac always rally stronger in every last minutes of every round. Pac is the champion but he was the one who bringing the fight to the challenger. The challenger did nothing enough to win the fight against the champ. You jumping to conclusions , I have not said anywhere Bradley won , my concern is the fight was much closer than all the original uproar warranted , it first appeared that Pac won easily and by many rounds I dont think thats the case , I think he won but it was much closer than what I first thought it was , and in saying that I feel a bit bad for Bradley he didnt deserve all the crap he got for that fight .

Thats not a proof that bradley won, thats only a proof that HBO was biased and proof of pacs misses.. Bradley did his thing and did okay, but he didnt do enough in this eyes of majority of people. yes he made it close, but not that close that it couldve gone either way.. yes pacquiao missed a lot, but i doesnt mean he didnt land the meaningful and dictating punches in the fight, because he still did..

And your narrow minded and blind as a bat , watch the dam video kid what is supposed to be scoring actually missed , ah hello !! anybody that watches that video whether they a boxers judges or casual fans can see clearly that all is NOT what appeared to be in the live event where you make an instant decision heavily influenced by commentators and what you THOUGHT you saw , here now after the fact you can scrutinize that decision by looking at all the evidence !! Is that what really happened to the entire fight? The video clearly shows Lampey was nut hugging Pacquaio but that is not the whole point. I watched the fight many times sound muted and when Pac or Bradley landed a punch, I freeze the video part, rewind, rewatch it in slow mo to see if the punch actually landed. Pac missing a lot of punches but so did Bradley because he was running and backpedaling the entire fight. Bradley tickling punches were missing and most were blocked by arms and gloves. Pac was actually landed clearly harder puches vs Bradley tickling punches. While both doing nothing for the first two minutes in every rounds Pac always rally stronger in every last minutes of every round. Pac is the champion but he was the one who bringing the fight to the challenger. The challenger did nothing enough to win the fight against the champ.

Just another way for Bradley nuthuggers(what a shame that they even exist) to justify their lies. Pacquiao beat him 10 rounds to 2. Any rounds Bradley may have won were still close and by no means dominant. For Pac it was the opposite.

The 5 judges who scored the fight for Pacquaio vs Alzheimer's disease prone century old 3 judges who scored for Bradley. One has admitted Pac clearly won half of the rounds but then he had Bradley beaten Pac in one sided decision in his score card . Dementia? And your narrow minded and blind as a bat , watch the dam video kid what is supposed to be scoring actually missed , ah hello !! anybody that watches that video whether they a boxers judges or casual fans can see clearly that all is NOT what appeared to be in the live event where you make an instant decision heavily influenced by commentators and what you THOUGHT you saw , here now after the fact you can scrutinize that decision by looking at all the evidence !!

Not only have I not read the all the tweets, I haven't read a single tweet. I haven't logged into twitter in months. I thought Pacquiao won the fight, but to say they had to see the same fight, because Lampley said it's what he saw, is just goofy. Fighters, athletes, singers, actors, and fans aren't boxing judges. The 5 judges who scored the fight for Pacquaio vs Alzheimer's disease prone century old 3 judges who scored for Bradley. One has admitted Pac clearly won half of the rounds but then he had Bradley beaten Pac in one sided decision in his score card . Dementia?

The commentators and compubox have other things to think about during the fight. 100% of the judges attention is on the fight and judges know what to look out for. In the end it was a close fight and the judges scored it accordingly. 5 international wbo judges scored it all for pac, 99.9% of boxing journalists and commentators/analysts scored it for pac, majority of former and current boxers (i.e. holyfield, marquez and andre ward) scored it for pac, majority of fans scored it for pac, the mayweathers scored it for pac, bradley's manager scored it for pac, and on and on..you guys need to give this up and stop reposting this video. pac won and bradley got a gift....you guys are just getting pathetic with this now.

JMM must be absolutely outraged at the decision bradley got over Pac. JMM said now Pac knows how he must feel. But having said that JMM must be appalled by the decsion and feeling sorry for Pac

Regardless if Pacquiao didn't land as many shots as it originally looked. BRADLEY DID NOTHING TO WIN THIS FIGHT! Just because he didn't land as many punches doesn't mean he lost. The punches he did land were the cleaner more effective punches and he dictated the pace of the fight and was the aggressor. Bradley was in survival mode the whole fight and landed nothing significant! Jesus people who continually try and justify that decision are IDIOTS! It just shows the peel of HATE people have for Pacquiao. When you have the Mayweathers of all people admitting it was a bogus decisionthat should say something. I love how people are disecting certain parts of rounds yet fail to point out the fact that Bradley did nothing in this fight to win. When you have every boxing analyst and expert in the sport that knows more than all of us saying this was a horrible decision that says something and it amazes me that people are trying to justify this decision EVERY DAMN DAY! If Bradley won the fight people wouldn't have to try so hard to justify it! The world and all the experts know what they saw and the small minority of HATERS can't change that!

TS is an idiot. how can say that this video was a proof that Bradley won? There even no Pac highlights on the video. How about watching this? nice. Notice Bradleys head snapping back at those shots. See that Bradley fans? this isnt amateur boxing, thats how a real punch connects. Not the lame pitty pat flicker jabs was touching Mannys gloves and elbows all night. Real punches landed > air jabs Rocky music > HBO commentary

TS is an idiot. how can say that this video was a proof that Bradley won? There even no Pac highlights on the video. How about watching this?

Casual fans come and go and always will be potential for more, but its us hardcore fans who have to deal with roberries every single week, everywhere in the world. But I know dumb casuals just stick to "Bradley tapped that ass" and such. Great to know youre the almighty casual fan and defender of your own. Another clown blocked..Dont even bother replying you will be blocked and im aboht to get a bj, peace.:boxing: This is most likely another Floyd worshiper. They need casual fans for their PPV competition. They blame and insult them when it suits their silly, childish logic. Idiots like this need to just stay in their basements and not allowed to come out there. What is so complicated about boxing? These idiots always make it sound as if you need a Harvard degree to understand boxing.

I know, but they are of a common opinion that is by faaaar the popular one. They all saw the same thing that most who watched on T.V. saw. Even the people that cheered bradley to win saw the same thing; A one sided fight... I know the vid don't prove a bradley win , just biased commentating that has already been happening forever in HBO boxing. But as you see many are looking for any excuse to convince themselves they saw the fight differently and do not get the point of this video... it only works if you already hated Pacman. I hear ya. I'm not arguing that Pacquiao didn't win the fight. I believe he did (though I think it was a lot closer than most people). The majority definitely saw a Pacquiao victory, but using that to say the judges "had" to see the same thing just doesn't work.

im aboht to get a bj, peace.:boxing: Nice. What's his name?

Without casual fans, boxing would be on life support. Stop acting like you're better than casual fans, because you think you know more than everyone else. Fans like you, are sickening. Casual fans come and go and always will be potential for more, but its us hardcore fans who have to deal with roberries every single week, everywhere in the world. But I know dumb casuals just stick to "Bradley tapped that ass" and such. Great to know youre the almighty casual fan and defender of your own. Another clown blocked..Dont even bother replying you will be blocked and im aboht to get a bj, peace.:boxing:

Not only have I not read the all the tweets, I haven't read a single tweet. I haven't logged into twitter in months. I thought Pacquiao won the fight, but to say they had to see the same fight, because Lampley said it's what he saw, is just goofy. Fighters, athletes, singers, actors, and fans aren't boxing judges. I know, but they are of a common opinion that is by faaaar the popular one. They all saw the same thing that most who watched on T.V. saw. Even the people that cheered bradley to win saw the same thing; A one sided fight... I know the vid don't prove a bradley win , just biased commentating that has already been happening forever in HBO boxing. But as you see many are looking for any excuse to convince themselves they saw the fight differently and do not get the point of this video... it only works if you already hated Pacman.

So lets get this straight, everyone is in agreement that the thread title is misleading. This video doesnt show Bradley winning the fight, its about the commentators being biased. Madden was especially biased during Favre games, so this is nothing new, also every commentator loved Jordan. It happens, this is sports. I hope someone else can make a 15 min video clip proving the moon exists.

MOST saw the same thing.. Havent you read the tweets of the peeps sitting ringside... The pro fighters, athletes, singers, actors, and fans... Yeah they all mostly saw a one sided fight... Not only have I not read the all the tweets, I haven't read a single tweet. I haven't logged into twitter in months. I thought Pacquiao won the fight, but to say they had to see the same fight, because Lampley said it's what he saw, is just goofy. Fighters, athletes, singers, actors, and fans aren't boxing judges.

Im sure its been pointed out in the thread, but the video is about biased commentary not who won. And Dude did an amazing job showing that. People see what they want to, specially the haters. HBO has been nuthugging for years...NOTHING NEW