[VIDEO]Bradley: Mayweather will beat Pacquiao Easy

eazzzzzzzyyyyyyy work

For all the trolls I think the entire boxing community knows that Mayweather beats Pac. Bob was just good at blinding a lot of "fans" for awhile.. People know the truth though..

this isnt directed to the TS...its to bradley...stfu u idiot u got ur a55 beat by pac and u havent even fought Floyd to even make a comparison... You didn't have to put that bit Pacquiao could never beat my ass I crack myself up

Maybe just as easy as he beat him..... being sarcastic.

I've been on his facebook and twitter for a while now... I've noticed a lot of them are Mexican.... I thought maybe it was because of his wife. From what 5 to 20

Let me try to simplify. Making your opponent miss does score points. I'll say it again for you, defense is 1 of the criteria used to judge a pro fight. That's not an opinion for you to disagree with, it's a fact. Hitting your opponent more than you're being hit also scores points, obviously. Right, so making your opponent miss won't win you a round (which is the point in a fight) unless you're hitting your opponent more than you're being hit. Either way it's the same conclusion, it's not good policy for a fighter to stand in front of Pacquiao. My point to you is simply that you're wrong saying that a fighter cant stand in front of Pacquiao. Bradley and Marquez had success standing in front of Pacquiao. They were both able to make him miss while standing right in front of him. That's something that you can't refute regardless of who you think won either of those fights. Bradley did not have success standing in front of Pacquiao, Bradley had success when he moved around in the later rounds. He got his sh*t pushed in standing in front of Pacquiao and Marquez took 3 fights to finally beat Pacquiao (yes Marquez won but Pac got the decision) and he still ended up getting hit more. You keep saying "if you stand in front of Pacquiao you're goin to hit", well if you participate in a pro fight that doesn't end in a quick KO you're going to get hit. Of course you're going to get hit fighting Pacquiao, you're not saying anything there. The question is can Mayweather have success standing in front of Pacquiao, and the answer is yes it's possible for him to have some success. It's possible the sky will fall in too but it's not bloody likely is it. Mayweather's best bet would be to move around but he can't do that any more, just like RJJ lost his mobility so has Mayweather. 1) You're obviously delusional, Bradley did not lose. You're entitled to disagree with the decision all you like, but trying to deny reality makes you look crazy. 2)Mayweather would be the favorite based on who people would bet their hard earned money on. You sound silly. Bradley is just as much of an American as Mayweather is, yet He was a huge underdog to Pacquiao. 3)Youre too emotionally invested man. You're starting to sound like a lot ifthe ignorant clowns who took to twitter after the fight bashing Bradley. You're not inside Bradley's head, you're in no position to psychoanalyze him and explain why he said what he said. Look, I personally feel that Pacquiao won the fight too but he didn't dominate Bradley like you want to claim. Neither fighter impressed me all that much and I think that Bradley is only stating the obvious. I'm sorry that hurts your feelings but you need to man up. 1. He got the decision but he lost the fight. If you don't think a fighter can lose despite getting the decision then ask Chris Eubank, he'll tell you how he lost to Michael Watson the first time but got the decision. 2. Which people? because people in the Phillipines won't be betting on Mayweather. If you're talking about Americans, then yeah but that's precisely my point. 3. I am a Bradley fan, I think he can win the rematch but it's clear he's gone defensive over the robbery and has now started to down talk Pacquiao. His reaction to the whole thing has been delusional and disappointing (kind of like the personal insults you insist on resorting to :-) ).

sound like he says floyd would beat him but he will never stop him,funny how who ever made the vid tried to make it seem like bradley says floyd wouldn't win Along with all the delusional trolls who are so desperate, they NEED to hear a boxer to say that Pacquiao could beat Floyd

Which one is it Timmy? sound like he says floyd would beat him but he will never stop him,funny how who ever made the vid tried to make it seem like bradley says floyd wouldn't win

0:06 "Mayweather will never beat him" right before saying that "Mayweather will beat him" Try fitting a "never" in there..

He said the same thing in both videos? Mayweather will never stop him Mayweather will beat him easy work It'll be like the Marquez fight 0:06 "Mayweather will never beat him" right before saying that

Which one is it Timmy? He said the same thing in both videos? Mayweather will never stop him Mayweather will beat him easy work It'll be like the Marquez fight

this isnt directed to the TS...its to bradley...stfu u idiot u got ur a55 beat by pac and u havent even fought Floyd to even make a comparison... You didn't have to put that bit Pacquiao could never beat my ass

For all the trolls this isnt directed to the TS...its to bradley...stfu u idiot u got ur a55 beat by pac and u havent even fought Floyd to even make a comparison...

If Bradley think he can beat Mayweather and he lost to Pac, what makes him think that Mayweather can beat Pac? Is he mad cause theyre not giving him a rematch which will give him another big payday?

Which one is it Timmy? Yah I wonder how he really feels?

Tho I do agree he can beat Manny easily, but he would go through hell and deepest waters to do so. Problem like 8 swing rounds.

Making someone miss is not success especially when you're still shipping far more punches than your opponent, hitting your opponent is success. If you stand in front of Pacquiao you're going to get hit. 1. Bradley lost - you need to accept reality and it was nowhere near as competitive as Pacquiao-Marquez 2. Mayweather would be favourite but that's all it is - favouritism largely as a result of him being American, in the Phillipines Pacquiao would be favourite 3. and this is the real point, Bradley is only saying what he's saying because he knows he got a gift decision, he's trying to play down Pacquiao as a fighter because him having the title is a sham and a stain on boxing and it's pathetic because MP beat the fcuk out of him on the night.Let me try to simplify. Making your opponent miss does score points. I'll say it again for you, defense is 1 of the criteria used to judge a pro fight. That's not an opinion for you to disagree with, it's a fact. Hitting your opponent more than you're being hit also scores points, obviously. My point to you is simply that you're wrong saying that a fighter cant stand in front of Pacquiao. Bradley and Marquez had success standing in front of Pacquiao. They were both able to make him miss while standing right in front of him. That's something that you can't refute regardless of who you think won either of those fights. You keep saying "if you stand in front of Pacquiao you're goin to hit", well if you participate in a pro fight that doesn't end in a quick KO you're going to get hit. Of course you're going to get hit fighting Pacquiao, you're not saying anything there. The question is can Mayweather have success standing in front of Pacquiao, and the answer is yes it's possible for him to have some success. 1) You're obviously delusional, Bradley did not lose. You're entitled to disagree with the decision all you like, but trying to deny reality makes you look crazy. 2)Mayweather would be the favorite based on who people would bet their hard earned money on. You sound silly. Bradley is just as much of an American as Mayweather is, yet He was a huge underdog to Pacquiao. 3)Youre too emotionally invested man. You're starting to sound like a lot ifthe ignorant clowns who took to twitter after the fight bashing Bradley. You're not inside Bradley's head, you're in no position to psychoanalyze him and explain why he said what he said. Look, I personally feel that Pacquiao won the fight too but he didn't dominate Bradley like you want to claim. Neither fighter impressed me all that much and I think that Bradley is only stating the obvious. I'm sorry that hurts your feelings but you need to man up.

Timing and accuracy will beat speed and power. Pacquiao fans will never understand this.

If this is true, Mayweather would have fought Pacman a long time ago. Fantasy fights are useless. If Floyd Jr continues to duck Pac, it means he can't beat Pac. And I'd rather believe Floyd himself.

How dare Bradley say what the majority in the know also say.