I'd be interested to see what people think about this. Obviously Bradley scored a lot better on the cards than Cotto did but lots of people thought Cotto-Floyd was closer than the judges had it while pretty much everyone thought Pacquiao won that fight quite comfortably.
I think both guys gave spirited performance but I actually thought Miguel caused Floyd more problems than Bradley caused Pacquiao.
What do you think?
No way Cotto won the 3rd or 10th, doing what???
9 was close, I actually scored it for Cotto rewatching the fight, and I gave him 6 and 8. Round 5, yes Floyd was on the ropes the whole round, but he out fought Cotto off the ropes the entire round, it was crazy how he hitting him over and over off the ropes. Round 5 was competitive but a clear Floyd round.
As I remember it he backed Floyd up for most of the 3rd behind the jab and hit him with some nice body shots too....Floyd retaliated with uppercuts but it could've gone either way and was a close round.
Round 10 I think Cotto stole it near the end by landing a few clean blows in the last 20 seconds of the round. It was a close round whatever way you look at it.
naw man.
May-cotto:
Cotto took rounds 6 and 8 clearly. Round 9 was close and round 5 was competitive.
Pac-bradley:
Bradley took rounds 10 and 12. Rounds 1 and 9 were close.
Neither bradley or cotto should have won more than 4 rounds max, and neither should have won fewer than 2. 3 being about the most fair.
But hey "bro", a lot of cotto fans thought cotto won 5 rounds which is lretty laughable. Same goes for anyone who thought bradley won more than 3-4 rounds at the most.
i got cotto winning for sure 4 rounds.. 5 kinda tossing a coin because it was very close... But point is that it doesnt matter all we say and all these discussions and who won what and who did what because the sport is corrupted and dirty and i refuse to watch another fight.. Its gotten to the point that its bs!!!
difference being, however many rounds cotto won was because he outfought mayweather. Whatever rounds bradley won were because pacquaio was inactive and took minutes off, giving the round away.
thank you... Thats what im talking about
You could give Cotto the 3rd and 10th, but the 12th was quite clearly a Mayweather round(one of the more dominant rounds of the fight). 3 & 10 were close though, as was 9. Cotto won 6 & 8 and 5 was another close round. In fact, if you gave all of the close rounds to Cotto he would've won the fight, but that'd have been very unfair on Floyd.
No way Cotto won the 3rd or 10th, doing what???
9 was close, I actually scored it for Cotto rewatching the fight, and I gave him 6 and 8. Round 5, yes Floyd was on the ropes the whole round, but he out fought Cotto off the ropes the entire round, it was crazy how he hitting him over and over off the ropes. Round 5 was competitive but a clear Floyd round.
Naw man.
May-Cotto:
Cotto took rounds 6 and 8 clearly. Round 9 was close and round 5 was competitive.
Pac-Bradley:
Bradley took rounds 10 and 12. Rounds 1 and 9 were close.
Neither Bradley or Cotto should have won more than 4 rounds max, and neither should have won fewer than 2. 3 being about the most fair.
But hey "bro", a lot of Cotto fans thought Cotto won 5 rounds which is lretty laughable. Same goes for anyone who thought Bradley won more than 3-4 rounds at the most.
Difference being, however many rounds cotto won was because he outfought mayweather. Whatever rounds bradley won were because pacquaio was inactive and took minutes off, giving the round away.
Man there are some hardcore Cotto stans on here. How on gods green earth did they give Cotto the 3rd, 10th, and 12th???????
Both were about the same. Bradley and Cotto won 4 rounds at the very most, 3 being the most fair, and 2 at the least.
You could give Cotto the 3rd and 10th, but the 12th was quite clearly a Mayweather round(one of the more dominant rounds of the fight). 3 & 10 were close though, as was 9. Cotto won 6 & 8 and 5 was another close round. In fact, if you gave all of the close rounds to Cotto he would've won the fight, but that'd have been very unfair on Floyd.
your crazy...it looks like you may be a mayweather nut hugger... I gave bradley one round two being the most... Cotto won about five rounds against mayweather bro..
Naw man.
May-Cotto:
Cotto took rounds 6 and 8 clearly. Round 9 was close and round 5 was competitive.
Pac-Bradley:
Bradley took rounds 10 and 12. Rounds 1 and 9 were close.
Neither Bradley or Cotto should have won more than 4 rounds max, and neither should have won fewer than 2. 3 being about the most fair.
But hey "bro", a lot of Cotto fans thought Cotto won 5 rounds which is lretty laughable. Same goes for anyone who thought Bradley won more than 3-4 rounds at the most.
your crazy...it looks like you may be a mayweather nut hugger... I gave bradley one round two being the most... Cotto won about five rounds against mayweather bro..
and you have the cheek to call people crazy!
man there are some hardcore cotto stans on here. How on gods green earth did they give cotto the 3rd, 10th, and 12th???????
Both were about the same. Bradley and cotto won 4 rounds at the very most, 3 being the most fair, and 2 at the least.
your crazy...it looks like you may be a mayweather nut hugger... I gave bradley one round two being the most... Cotto won about five rounds against mayweather bro..
Man there are some hardcore Cotto stans on here. How on gods green earth did they give Cotto the 3rd, 10th, and 12th???????
Both were about the same. Bradley and Cotto won 4 rounds at the very most, 3 being the most fair, and 2 at the least.
Mayweather cotto I had 117-111 (wouldn't complain about116-112), the pac/Bradley fight I had 118-110 (but again could have had it 117-111). Cotto put a much better performance than Bradley since some the rounds mayweather won was close
scorecards aside, i thought cotto performed better with may than bradley with pac.
it's funny that between cotto and bradley, cotto was the one that had no quit in him. early in the bradley fight, even before bradley he rolled his ankle, it looked like his confidence faded away.
cotto did better against mayweather than bradley against pac.
Cotto landed meaningful and telling shots against mayweather (and u can see that in the replays) while bradley didnt do anthing at all. I didnt see any replays during the fight that he landed something super clean like pac's punches to him..
Cotto made mayweather's nose bleed and work the jab..
While bradley? Im really butthurt about this. Bradley's jab was ****in worthless, no power and didnt even land clean on pac..
Cotto and mayweather was far more competitive than this bradley worthless fight. I cant belive he can even brag about this with all his **** talking before hand.
But if cotto won against mayweather, the same reaction would have happen.. But then atleast it was closer than this worthless bradley fight.
i agreee... If anything cotto should had won against mayweather lol i was way closer than this fight manny bradley... Boxing its worthless now a days its not the same... I rather watch mma and ufc its real..
in terms of rounds won bradley did slightly better. i would say cotto put up the better performance though. bradley fought well but cotto fought the fight of his life, a near flawless fight in terms of gameplan and execution.
Cotto did better against mayweather than bradley against pac.
Cotto landed meaningful and telling shots against mayweather (and u can see that in the replays) while bradley didnt do anthing at all. i didnt see any replays during the fight that he landed something super clean like pac's punches to him..
cotto made mayweather's nose bleed and work the jab..
while Bradley? im really butthurt about this. bradley's jab was ****in worthless, no power and didnt even land clean on pac..
cotto and mayweather was far more competitive than this bradley worthless fight. i cant belive he can even brag about this with all his **** talking before hand.
But if cotto won against mayweather, the same reaction would have happen.. but then atleast it was closer than this worthless bradley fight.
You're right Bradley didn't do anything special and for the last 5/6 rounds neither did Pac. Pacquiao looked a class above Bradley and could have taken him out if he wanted to but he chose to coast in the last half of the fight and try and steal rounds in the last 30 secs. People are screaming robbery because they only remember the dominant rounds were Pacquiao was clearly hurting Bradley.
I'd be interested to see what people think about this. Obviously Bradley scored a lot better on the cards than Cotto did but lots of people thought Cotto-Floyd was closer than the judges had it while pretty much everyone thought Pacquiao won that fight quite comfortably.
I think both guys gave spirited performance but I actually thought Miguel caused Floyd more problems than Bradley caused Pacquiao.
What do you think?
Cotto did better, but Floyd looked superb that night as well.
Pacquiao last night looked B+ and Bradley was always a B.
Cotto did better against mayweather than bradley against pac.
Cotto landed meaningful and telling shots against mayweather (and u can see that in the replays) while bradley didnt do anthing at all. i didnt see any replays during the fight that he landed something super clean like pac's punches to him..
cotto made mayweather's nose bleed and work the jab..
while Bradley? im really butthurt about this. bradley's jab was ****in worthless, no power and didnt even land clean on pac..
cotto and mayweather was far more competitive than this bradley worthless fight. i cant belive he can even brag about this with all his **** talking before hand.
But if cotto won against mayweather, the same reaction would have happen.. but then atleast it was closer than this worthless bradley fight.
I'd be interested to see what people think about this. Obviously Bradley scored a lot better on the cards than Cotto did but lots of people thought Cotto-Floyd was closer than the judges had it while pretty much everyone thought Pacquiao won that fight quite comfortably.
I think both guys gave spirited performance but I actually thought Miguel caused Floyd more problems than Bradley caused Pacquiao.
What do you think?
the cotto mayweather fight should had been a split decisions if anyting!! Not pacquiao bradley!!!!! that was defenately a unanimous decision in favor of manny pacquiao... the cotto mayweather fight was alot closer than this one was... i gave Bradley maybe 2 rounds... Manny clearly out landed him and manny didnt have to do much against Bradley his not an ELITE fighter... well his not going to be a champ for long cuz i can be sure his next opponent will destroy him... i hope they put him against Cotto or Canelo or someone good... even if these fighters go down in weight to 147lbs they will destroy Bradley!!!!