Joel Diaz:Beating Pacquiao and coming out the ring without a win the biggest fear

of the year my balls Actually it was & the logic behind choosing it was sound. It was 1 of the years highest profile fights & more than 80% of viewers thought Marquez won.

it was voted robbery of the year.... of the year my balls

Those guys have been in charge of scoring some of the biggest fights in the history of the sport and their track record speaks for itself. You guys kill me with all this conspiracy crap. If these judges where anywhere as bad as you claim, then why are they consistanty in charge of the biggest fights in our sport. you're stupidity has overtaken any rational thought processes in your head. By the way you speak, it sounds like you had smarts as some point in your life, but that was taken away from you over the years and I guess no one filled you in on that so you're under the impression you know what you are talking about. Lemme help you and tell you something you shoulda been told long ago, you are not smart, and you do NOT know what you are talking about. did you just start watching boxing a few years ago? sounds like it... :lame:

:lol1::lol1::lol1::lol1: oh god I love this site! Those guys have been in charge of scoring some of the biggest fights in the history of the sport and their track record speaks for itself. You guys kill me with all this conspiracy crap. If these judges where anywhere as bad as you claim, then why are they consistanty in charge of the biggest fights in our sport.

Those are the best judges in the sport of boxing and I challenge you to show me where they have made shady scoring of fights. Robberies have always been with those judges who aren't very know, don't have a real track record for scoring fights and are bought in all of the sudden to score big fights. You guys claim no one is getting a decision over either, but that's not true as Morales got the nod over Manny. :lol1::lol1::lol1::lol1: oh god I love this site!

Why would bradley get a decision? I dont get it, No one is getting a decision against Pac or Mayweather, Not especially when the judges are Ford and Moretti, roth etc Those are the best judges in the sport of boxing and I challenge you to show me where they have made shady scoring of fights. Robberies have always been with those judges who aren't very know, don't have a real track record for scoring fights and are bought in all of the sudden to score big fights. You guys claim no one is getting a decision over either, but that's not true as Morales got the nod over Manny.

Thats a stupid comparison. The judge gave Morales the decision in the first fight because 1. Morales dominated Pacquiao pretty easily and 2. Manny Pacquiao wasn't the global superstar he is today. I'm sure that judge had Manny goggles and was only focused on what Manny was doing and not what Marquez was doing. Face it, most people thought Manny lost that fight. He was booed out the arena and most polls had Marquez winning. stop it. Manny had the whole mexicutioner moniker going and was one of the most popular boxers in the sport at that time. While 350-450k ppv isn't a lot compared to the numbers he does today, that is still better than anyone in the history of those divisions was able to pull and the fact that he was started to do those on a regular basis, when no fighter today, outside of him and floyd can do better than those numbers on a consistent basis, it made more sense for judges to rob his opponents then, than it does now. And about the booing, Floyd was booed harder and had more sh1t throw at him when he fought Marquez than Pac. That's a fact and I dare you to try and refute that. Does that mean Marquez won that fight.....absolutely not as he was dominated to the point of embarrassment by Floyd. All that means is Marquez fans are just as delusional in real life than they are on this website.

it was voted robbery of the year.... You badly need him. You are welcome. http://www.mdshrink.com/

"Dear Lord if you can hear me now, please let the judges realize that we paid them extra for a reason. Thank you. Arum." Fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would bradley get a decision? I dont get it, No one is getting a decision against Pac or Mayweather, Not especially when the judges are Ford and Moretti, roth etc

wasn't it bob arum that immediately called for a rematch? oh and let's not forget marquez celebrating while pacquiao wobbled over to his corner to pray for a robbery "Dear Lord if you can hear me now, please let the judges realize that we paid them extra for a reason. Thank you. Amen."

very very legit claim. lol at the idiots that dont think pac got the biggest gift of his career against marquez. everyone knows whats going happen, its no secret that unless tim KOs pac, hes leavin the ring a loser, regardless of how much he takes manny to school...

For Bradley to win and get the judges decision he must fight like a challenger and bring the fight to the champion. Marquez will never get a decision against Pac if the fight is too close because he fights like he is the champion and he thinks Pac is the challenger. LOL @ the robbery comment. People talking about robbery when the fight is too close need to be checked their head. it was voted robbery of the year....

Obviously a legitimate claim.

The fact that Bob Arum said "It's just business" to Marquez at the post fight press conference tells me that it is very possible for Bradley to get robbed. And it also tells me that Arum himself knows who won that fight between Pacquiao and Marquez. And it also tells me that Arum had a lot to do with the judges decision.

:bottle::bottle::bottle: Morales beat Manny via a decision, because he fought like a man and didn't fight like a coward. If those judges are biased, please explain why Dave Morretti gave Morales the nod in his first fight with Pacquiao, yet gave the nod to Manny over Marquez in their third fight? If he is biased towards Manny, wouldn't he have scored the fight in favor of Pacquiao to help him rob El terrible in their first fight? BTW what bum is Marquez is facing next? I like how he and his fans live off of having close fight with Pacquiao..lol Thats a stupid comparison. The judge gave Morales the decision in the first fight because 1. Morales dominated Pacquiao pretty easily and 2. Manny Pacquiao wasn't the global superstar he is today. I'm sure that judge had Manny goggles and was only focused on what Manny was doing and not what Marquez was doing. Face it, most people thought Manny lost that fight. He was booed out the arena and most polls had Marquez winning.

pac just won a robbery in his very last fight...........the guy in no way deserved that last win. it's a valid complaint. JMM knows he wasnt robbed, and knows that Pac won the fight. The evidence being JMM wants to fight Pac again to have another attempt to beat him at least once. If he knew the judges would rob him, he wouldnt want to fight pac.

:bottle::bottle::bottle: Morales beat Manny via a decision, because he fought like a man and didn't fight like a coward. If those judges are biased, please explain why Dave Morretti gave Morales the nod in his first fight with Pacquiao, yet gave the nod to Manny over Marquez in their third fight? If he is biased towards Manny, wouldn't he have scored the fight in favor of Pacquiao to help him rob El terrible in their first fight? BTW what bum is Marquez is facing next? I like how he and his fans live off of having close fight with Pacquiao..lol

hit me up with a link dude

pac just won a robbery in his very last fight...........the guy in no way deserved that last win. it's a valid complaint. For Bradley to win and get the judges decision he must fight like a challenger and bring the fight to the champion. Marquez will never get a decision against Pac if the fight is too close because he fights like he is the champion and he thinks Pac is the challenger. LOL @ the robbery comment. People talking about robbery when the fight is too close need to be checked their head.