115-113 Really?

they have 3 judges for a reason. maybe one will see things the others don't. scoring a boxing match in real time is not easy at all. Froch makes it slightly easier by fighting in slow-mo for the most part If i can watch the fight in a drunken state and see that Froch isnt winning many of the rounds,i expect professional judges to atleast manage the same

The latest in a long line of SHOCKING cards! Froch won a round... 2 at the VERY most. And even that might be being generous! At least the right man won but FFS these judges need to be let go when they pull out these type of scores

Are you retarded? The British judge scored it 118-110 which was the right thing

I've never rated Carl Froch, how he was on boxingscenes pfp top 10 baffles me..

to give Froch 5 rounds is inept, but at least the right guy won

I gave Froch three rounds myself, I could see four, and if you really wanted to give Froch every round that was even somewhat close then maybe five rounds would have been acceptable. But no two ways about it, he was thoroughly outclassed.

They must have felt sorry for Froch or something

I thought John Keane had it about right, 118-110 maybe 117-111. For the record if you are going to make a new thread about something, try and get your facts right.

Froch is a bum. Like I said ward would dominate the whole fight which he did...(it's posted look it up). Even though ward was being modest by saying it was a tough fight. We all know this was one of his easiest fight, froch is just to slow, to one dimensional and has 0 defense.....this was a fight for ward to display that he is currently the best American fighter right now.... He fought against all the top guy at 168 ( excluding bute) and dominated in all his fights....MAYbe our other American fighters can learn a thing or 2 from the kid... Ur only the best when u can walk the walk and not just talk the talk. ask froch the bum expose.... Froch's a bum? Wow you are retarded.

I thought those scores were off quite a bit but oh well Ward still won on all of them..I'm not a big fan of either guy but I gave ward pretty much every round but maybe 1 toward the end..

Froch is a bum. Like I said ward would dominate the whole fight which he did...(it's posted look it up). Even though ward was being modest by saying it was a tough fight. We all know this was one of his easiest fight, froch is just to slow, to one dimensional and has 0 defense.....this was a fight for ward to display that he is currently the best American fighter right now.... He fought against all the top guy at 168 ( excluding bute) and dominated in all his fights....MAYbe our other American fighters can learn a thing or 2 from the kid... Ur only the best when u can walk the walk and not just talk the talk. ask froch the bum expose....

Froch fought gamely & won the 9, 10 & 11 in my book. Ward was tiring. I don't really care about the official scorecards because it was unanamous all around for the right guy. Say whatever you want but Froch made Ward work for that W.

Froch won at least 3 rounds to me. I wish those judges had it 8-4 at least. Lost some money because of it. Oh well.

Really? thats even more shocking, what were they watching apart fro round 9 and possibly 12 i had Froch losing every round. they have 3 judges for a reason. maybe one will see things the others don't. scoring a boxing match in real time is not easy at all.

Horrible judging from the American & Canadian judges.

The British judge scored it 118-110 not 115-113, it was the American and Canadian judges who scored it 115-113! Really? thats even more shocking, what were they watching apart fro round 9 and possibly 12 i had Froch losing every round.

The British judge scored it 118-110 not 115-113, it was the American and Canadian judges who scored it 115-113!