MARQUEZ: "Arum told me it was just business... I wanted to slap him...

What was Marquez thinking that Bob Arum wanted Pacman to lose come on now Bob Arum got what he wanted Marquez vs Pac 3 without Golden Boy and he got it.

He doesn't. U aint never see May running like Khan did and pushing like he did to stay alive. Can't believe you just said that I actually agree with Sin City. I think the next may fight we should count how many times, may pushes his opponent back to get space without punching it out. I think it will be at lest twice as much..

Marquez has lied before. He said he would knock Pac out and didn't, and when it goes to a decision he whines like a girl. Why did he lie and say he would ko Pac and he didnt? How are we supposed to believe anything he says when he's not a man of his word. But don't lie because you are not manly enough to even knock down Pac, you big baby. and this is why certain Pacquiao fans shouldn't be taken seriously. Hey buddy, Pacquiao lied too. He said he would finish this fight in decisive fashion. Why should we believe him when he says he thinks he clearly won the fight? Why should we believe him when he says he wants the Floyd fight? Why should we believe him when he says he agreed to the test? He has lied before of course. Using your logic.

He's just hyping the fourth fight guys! Last fight it's personal with Manny, now it's different. Two great boxers + drama + controversy = Great PPV!!! lol

edgarg is either a paid Top Rank shill or he is Bob Arum himself. I've never seen a poster defend Arum as much as this dude does. No matter what the issue is he thinks Bob is always in the right.

FFS give it up you retards.. It was a close fight and Pacman won. Replay shows the judge were right. Stop watching farking highlights or watching it once on that sh8Tty prime time dl. and basing ur winner on that.

LOL, so what exactly is Pacquiao's prime? He was 27 at that time, if thats not your physical prime than I don't know what is. He had stopped Barrera just two years before. I'm guessing you consider Pacquiao's prime to be that period of time where he was/is beating up on older, past prime, flat footed, weight drained fighters. Basically every fight he's faced since the first Morales fight. This. You practically took the words right out of my mouth, thank you. I'd like to add...Pacquiao used both of his hands...So when did he go from a "one handed" fighter to a "two handed" fighter? By Hatton? And if so, what was the dramatic change? He has looked the same since his first draw in las vegas.

I don't see many Filipino homeless or jobless, go figure!

Bob Arum doing all he can to protect the top rank cash cow. I've said a millions times, Arum is what is wrong with boxing, the sooner he leaves, the better for all involved. I wonder how Manny feels about all this, is he happy that he cannot be beaten under Bob Arum's protection or does it make him sad that his illustrious career is nothing more than an illusion.

arum ain't nuttin but a h8tn white man that got money, he using fannypac cause the da dude is forign and don't know no better because he neva graduated middle school Stupid flomo! If you don't know anything you better be quiet. Pacquiao completed his elementary education at Saavedra Saway Elementary School in General Santos City, but dropped out of high school due to extreme poverty. He left his home at age 14 because his mother, who had six children, was not making enough money to support her family. In February 2007 he took, and passed, a high school equivalency exam making him eligible for college education. He was awarded with a high school diploma by the Department of Education. Pacquiao enrolled for a college degree in business management at Notre Dame of Dadiangas University (NDDU) in his hometown in General Santos City. On February 18, 2009, Pacquiao was conferred the Honorary Degree of Doctor of Humanities (Honoris Causa) by Southwestern University (SWU) at the Waterfront Hotel and Casino in Lahug, Cebu City in recognition of his boxing achievements and humanitarian work. In preparation for his career as a lawmaker in the House of Representatives, Pacquiao enrolled in the Certificate Course in Development, Legislation, and Governance at the Development Academy of the Philippines – Graduate School of Public and Development Management (DAP-GSPDM). While Floyd beating the mother of his children in front of them. When his children tried to stop him beating their mother, he threatened him to kill them. He threw his father outa his house and disrespect in him national tv. He ordered the attempted murder at the skating park, etc....

Arum was just trying to make him feel better after he walked in and saw Marquez sitting their naked looking like the elephant man. Would he of preferred Arum to say "It was personal?" Marquez is not only butthurt but hes also a dumbass and thats all there is to it.

Yes, 3 close fights, all of them arguable and 2 of which were clearer for one fighter than the other according to the majority, but only one fighter came out of those three fights without a single loss. Make more sense now? The biggest point of all of it is that at least one of those fights out of three went to Marquez. Pac got the popularity decision in all of them. That's the problem. Three close fights, all arguable, but only one fighter came away unscathed.....That's the bull**** here, not him *****ing about losing close decisions. It's that only one fighter got all of those close decisions to go for him, not against as the other fighter did. Coincidence? All three close fights go against one fighter? The last two fights most people had Marquez winning, yet it was still Pac that came away with the wins. They were close, but if all three fights were close and all were arguable, why did only one fighter come away without a single loss in all of them? Do you think Pac would be bitter if he had not won a single fight in all three of those? Damn right he would, as would you. Surely you can understand his bitterness, it's impossible not to, that despite three fights, despite all supposedly being close arguable fights, despite being thought of as the slightly clearer winner in two of those three fights, he still didn't get a single win in all three of them. You don't understand because you are just happy that not a single decision went against your guy. Imagine, just try it for one moment, that not one of those went to Pac.....Would you be bitter? Would Pac be bitter?this...............

i speak nuttin but da truth. If Pacsham had any brains at all, he'd be a boss like Floyd instead of letting that greedy devil steal what he earned in da ring. Floyd puts his cash in his pockets because he smart, Pac is just dumb- at least Floyd graduated high school :rofl: HAHAHAHHA....finally this dude is gone, I was so sick of that racist trash :beerchug:

i speak nuttin but da truth. If Pacsham had any brains at all, he'd be a boss like Floyd instead of letting that greedy devil steal what he earned in da ring. Floyd puts his cash in his pockets because he smart, Pac is just dumb- at least Floyd graduated high school :rofl: Did i say that what i say isn't true that the person that u r talking to is 10000000000000000 times better than u? And u r comparing floyd wh6 is just a highschool graduate with pac? Lol. Pac is a very respected person in the phil while floyd is a joke and his brother/race are saying that floyd is making them look bad. Lol.

Yes, 3 close fights, all of them arguable and 2 of which were clearer for one fighter than the other according to the majority, but only one fighter came out of those three fights without a single loss. Make more sense now? The biggest point of all of it is that at least one of those fights out of three went to Marquez. Pac got the popularity decision in all of them. That's the problem. Three close fights, all arguable, but only one fighter came away unscathed.....That's the bull**** here, not him *****ing about losing close decisions. It's that only one fighter got all of those close decisions to go for him, not against as the other fighter did. Coincidence? All three close fights go against one fighter? The last two fights most people had Marquez winning, yet it was still Pac that came away with the wins. They were close, but if all three fights were close and all were arguable, why did only one fighter come away without a single loss in all of them? Do you think Pac would be bitter if he had not won a single fight in all three of those? Damn right he would, as would you. Surely you can understand his bitterness, it's impossible not to, that despite three fights, despite all supposedly being close arguable fights, despite being thought of as the slightly clearer winner in two of those three fights, he still didn't get a single win in all three of them. You don't understand because you are just happy that not a single decision went against your guy. Imagine, just try it for one moment, that not one of those went to Pac.....Would you be bitter? Would Pac be bitter? thats your problem if you actually think they were close pac won the first fight 115-110 pac won the second fight 115-112 pac won the third fight 116-112 pac clearly won all 3, and was -admittedly- robbed by a judge in first fight. pac remains undefeated in his prime and has just succeeded in selling over 50% of the entire year's ppv sales

Marquez is just bitter and he will believe what he believes and its his right to do so, he had 3 close fights versus Pac, but its just what it is, close fightsm far from a robbery .... Yes, 3 close fights, all of them arguable and 2 of which were clearer for one fighter than the other according to the majority, but only one fighter came out of those three fights without a single loss. Make more sense now? The biggest point of all of it is that at least one of those fights out of three went to Marquez. Pac got the popularity decision in all of them. That's the problem. Three close fights, all arguable, but only one fighter came away unscathed.....That's the bull**** here, not him *****ing about losing close decisions. It's that only one fighter got all of those close decisions to go for him, not against as the other fighter did. Coincidence? All three close fights go against one fighter? The last two fights most people had Marquez winning, yet it was still Pac that came away with the wins. They were close, but if all three fights were close and all were arguable, why did only one fighter come away without a single loss in all of them? Do you think Pac would be bitter if he had not won a single fight in all three of those? Damn right he would, as would you. Surely you can understand his bitterness, it's impossible not to, that despite three fights, despite all supposedly being close arguable fights, despite being thought of as the slightly clearer winner in two of those three fights, he still didn't get a single win in all three of them. You don't understand because you are just happy that not a single decision went against your guy. Imagine, just try it for one moment, that not one of those went to Pac.....Would you be bitter? Would Pac be bitter?

lol that was the 1 handed version of pac, he wasnt in his prime. and that was still a close fight, as opposed to the next 2 were morales was humiliated beyond belief. LOL, so what exactly is Pacquiao's prime? He was 27 at that time, if thats not your physical prime than I don't know what is. He had stopped Barrera just two years before. I'm guessing you consider Pacquiao's prime to be that period of time where he was/is beating up on older, past prime, flat footed, weight drained fighters. Basically every fight he's faced since the first Morales fight.

arum ain't nuttin but a h8tn white man that got money, he using fannypac cause the da dude is forign and don't know no better because he neva graduated middle school You're belittle a person who is 1000000000000000000000 times better than u. :lol1:

I don't blame him for wanting to retire. He has never got the respect he deserves. He had 6 loses and the only person to beat him in my mind was Mayweather. The Norwood decision was questionable, both loses to Pacquiao were close and could have gone either, and the John decision was a flat out robbery. He has a tough long career. I was in disgust when I first heard the Michael Buffer announce who won. I can understand why he feels the way he does. It's better for the sport if jmm retire he's a whiny cry baby anyway.

I'm tired of Marquez whining...it's ridiculous...he's never dominated Pacquiao EVER in their fights....what he used an excuse for winning the other fights with more connects..Pacquiao did the same thing in their last fight......this guy is full of excuses...am I saying he's a liar? No, but this dude maybe just twisting Arum's words..