Using plaster is not cool. How can you morally justify supporting Margarito against Cotto?
Even if he didn't know he had plaster in his hands, as a normal human being you can't help but feel Cotto deserves revenge.
Explain yourselves Margaritards.
If shane mosley could get away with him roiding up then why can people just find it in there hearts to forgive margarito? I think cotto is a great fighter but honestly I think that margarito has the heart of a lion and if we had fighter with half of margaritos heart I truelly think boxing would be a much better sport . Went margarito fought pacquiao he took his beating like a man and that night I became a fan of margarito .... Next week I just hope that the better fighter wins.....that said may the best man win and I just wanna see a great fight next week......one thing I wanna point out is cotto has a limite and margarito just keeps going cotto made it clear in the face off... margarito is will to die in the ring risk his life inside the ring how can anybody not love him for that?
to TS I dont see why their wont be anyone rooting for Margarito?
I personally am rooting for Cotto as I think he has more upside than Tony, and I also do expect to see a great second fight like the first one, to a lot o people this fight is still a toss up..
Can someone please verify that in Atlantic City (whatever state that is) the commision supplies you with there own wraps?May i add that Gabe Montoya a boxing writer said he seen and felt the wraps and said they were not as hard as had been made and was more like a credit card shape then a block out still wrong
Margarito and his team did what some would call "hiding something in plain sight." The idea being... WHO is going to even think anything if he is prancing around the ring with his plaster wraps as if with nothing to hide. Let's be real little man, he would have looked more suspicious with his gloves on during the post fight interviews etc.
THINK. :fing02:
Am when Billy Collins father touched Restos gloves he knew something was up straight away.Im pretty sure i seen Bayless touching the wraps
People that are soulless, have no compassion, and no respect for boxing, support Margarito. Those are the only ones I can think of.
if your brother killed a innocent man and face the death penalty and the judge placed his freedom in your hands....meaning your testimony would determine if your brother(your mother and father's son) lived in freedom or get sent away to die.....what would you do?....since your soul is pure, I think you'd want your family member to be spared....but on the flipside you'd be showing no respect for human life by allowing a killer to go unpunished......dudes who support Marg are NOT bad ppl...you can't take it there my dude
I feel there is another injustice going on within this story. It just doesn't add up to me. That and seeing all the Cotto stans constantly talk crap saying Tony wouldn't beat Cotto without the plaster irritated the hell out of me.
I'm on the Wargarito war wagon.
Using plaster is not cool. How can you morally justify supporting Margarito against Cotto?
Even if he didn't know he had plaster in his hands, as a normal human being you can't help but feel Cotto deserves revenge.
Explain yourselves Margaritards.
I was upset with the fight with Mosley and have been suspicious ever since, however, the man is willing to die in the ring with a ****ed up eye. You may hate him, doubt him, but you got to respect him.
well actually he is quite an entertaining fighter, all-action, which arguably, most fans wants to see in a fight. and there would still be people who would still give him the benefit of the doubt and prove once and for all he can redo what he did with Cotto, of course less the plaster. their coming fight would perhaps answer the lingering question of whether he did really cheated last time, if he win convincingly and devastatingly again, more people would again root for him onwards, i think. personally, i would be one of those people, keyword is REDEMPTION which at least in one point in our lives, in some ways, we did also wished for:boxing:
forgiveness comes with love....Marg's base loves him and they've forgiven him...thats part of life.....rooting for Marg is nothing to be ashamed of....with that said...WAR COTTO :boxing:
I cant help but feel sorry for the Puerto Ricans but I get where they comming from. Mexicans have been owning their ass for a while now and a scandal pop up where they can point and blame and pin point why their last hope (cotto) quit. Its just the only out they have to this embarrassing ownership the Mexicans have been putting on them. So obviousvly they will blow this issue up beyond belief and dwell on it day and night, it's the only situation they can do that to. Their is no out for Salido owning Juanma so we dont hear a peep, Their is no out for Arce owning Vasquez jr so we dont hear a peep, and so on and so on.. Let them have their last hooray cause come December 3rd Margarito will rape Cotto and he will be another Puerto Rican a Mexican decided to make their B.itch.
Well, personally, I can root for whoever the fukk I want. Were people not still rooting for Tyson despite him being a rapist and dong foul things inside the ring? What about juicers like Toney or Roy? Dudes still got a lotta love on here. Cheato Triniwraps? Yup, Ricans still hanging onto his ashy nuts.
Plus, it's never proven Margarito used loaded wraps against Miguel "Tebow" Cotto. The only thing people can actually say as fact is that he was found with a plaster-like substance inside his wraps before the Mosley fight.
They cannot justify supporting a mocorito that used plaster, because that is indefensible. They CAN support a mocorito that is 'accused' of using plaster, because their stance is that he was unjustly accused and that there is 'no proof'. There may not be indisputable proof, but there is MORE THAN AMPLE EVIDENCE to support the accusation and probably enough to convict...except it never went to court.
You can make an accusation with NO evidence but to get a conviction, you need suffucuent evidence which will stand up in court. It was taken up by the FBI, because if there actually had been Plaster-of Paris, it would have been a federal offence. But they found only TRACES, (meaning microscopic) of 2 extremely common ingredients used in thousands of products all over the world including cosmetics, which were in no quantity at all, and still needed another ingredient which was absent, to make Plaster-of Paris. And of course they would have needed QUANTITY, and all they had were microscopic TRACES, So they found no case and just dropped it.
Thats right son, and pac won. As will cotto on dec 3.
pac didn't win ssshiit.....:chairshot
his PED's don't work againts Marquez......Floyd is gonna kill this little monkey when he finally decides to take the tests....
Keep fighting those 40 yr old and shot fighters pac...:fing02:
other fighters left overs...figures.
Using plaster is not cool. How can you morally justify supporting Margarito against Cotto?
Even if he didn't know he had plaster in his hands, as a normal human being you can't help but feel Cotto deserves revenge.
Explain yourselves Margaritards.
Be realistic, not fantastic. He was actually shown NOT to have "Plaster" on the pad. All that was visible was a used gauze pad with was illegal it should have been new. It took several laboratory testings, including the FBI lab to find that there were traces...TRACES of 2 components of Plaster of Paris. But remember only TRACES, which means microscopic particles, not QUANTITIES. They also announced (but all the dumb imbeciles haven't read that far), that these ingredients were used very commonly in thousands of products, particularly in cosmetics. So I naturally thought,,,absorbent powder, or even the components which cause the scent in powder.
It was also said that these 2 common products are to be found in virtually every kitchen in the world. There was NO accusation, that Plaster of Paris was used, only as I've said above.
It was all a stupid fuss caused by Nazeem "Sherlock" Richardson, trying to emulate the success he had in upsetting Trinidad in his dressing room over his bandages which had a little too much gauze, just before the Hopkins fight, illegal only in New York. And it worked then and worked before the Mosley fight. His story that he saw a lump was a lie as the bandages had been supervised already and passed by a Commission member.
It was just that he arrived late and one hand had been already bandaged so he insisted that it be done again in his presence. It was pure mischance.
To me, who deals in provable facts and logic, the whole fantasy is nothing less than completely disgusting, and shows up the sub-humanity of the average BoxingScene poster.
I care nothing for either Margarito nor Cotto, except that they are two good fighters who always give their best. As a former Law student and Law clerk, I'm interested in justice and evidence, not fiction nor feelings nor speculation.
Using plaster is not cool. How can you morally justify supporting Margarito against Cotto?
Even if he didn't know he had plaster in his hands, as a normal human being you can't help but feel Cotto deserves revenge.
Explain yourselves Margaritards.
They cannot justify supporting a mocorito that used plaster, because that is indefensible. They CAN support a mocorito that is 'accused' of using plaster, because their stance is that he was unjustly accused and that there is 'no proof'. There may not be indisputable proof, but there is MORE THAN AMPLE EVIDENCE to support the accusation and probably enough to convict...except it never went to court.