Is Marquez 3-0 vs. Pacquiao?

I've got JMM ahead 2-0-1. No need for a 4th. Everybody knows who the better fighter is. And that's not to say that Manny is not great. Just that JMM is greater. :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

Apparently a good argument can be made that Pac is 3-0 Or a good argument can be made that they're 1-1-1. Or a good argument can be made that they're 2-1 or 2-0-1 for either guy. Hell a good argument can be made that they're 0-0-3 this is my take

3-0 JMM!!! In all 3 fights JMM has knocked down Pac at least 4x, is the aggressor, throws and lands the most punches, backs Pac up making him back-peddle showing the world that Pac is afraid to initiate combat because of his power. In all 3 fights JMM has won more total rounds than Pac, I'll certainly say that.

I had Pacquiao winning the first fight and Marquez winning the second and third fights.

3-0 JMM!!! In all 3 fights JMM has knocked down Pac at least 4x, is the aggressor, throws and lands the most punches, backs Pac up making him back-peddle showing the world that Pac is afraid to initiate combat because of his power.

i dont get how anyone had it a draw in the first or second.. its not even mathematically possible, which is why anyone has either a draw didnt watch them or is just makingit up. just one example was some genius yesterday who posted his scorecard which was apparently a 113-113 draw, but it cleary added up to 113-112 looking at it. Exactly. The truth of the matter is most boxing fans probably don't even score the fights. They just watch and say, "Eh, it felt like a draw." But you're right. Mathematically, you cannot have a draw in either of the first two fights.

I get confused when people claim the second fight was a draw between Marquez and Pacquiao. How can it be? There was only one knockdown. So you could have had it 114-113 or 115-112 but not even no matter what. i dont get how anyone had it a draw in the first or second.. its not even mathematically possible, which is why anyone has either a draw didnt watch them or is just makingit up. just one example was some genius yesterday who posted his scorecard which was apparently a 113-113 draw, but it cleary added up to 113-112 looking at it.

Pacquiao won all 3 fights on my card but more importantly he won all 3 fights on the judges scorecards. so its not even remotely possble that jmm is 3-0 against pac, its actually completly impossible. hes not even 1-2 lol.

I get confused when people claim the second fight was a draw between Marquez and Pacquiao. How can it be? There was only one knockdown. So you could have had it 114-113 or 115-112 but not even no matter what.

This trilogy is no different that Morales vs Barrera IMO. That's what great about boxing when two styles mesh so perfectly together they produce close classic bouts. Morales-Barrera would have been one of the best trilogies ever if the judges got the scores right. The first fight belonged to Barrera thanks to the phantom knockdown call. The second fight was a Morales win, probably the clearest of the trilogy. And the third fight I had a dead even draw but could see Barrera winning. The judges ruined that trilogy for me. This one, I think they did a much better job except for the first fight, which Pacquiao clearly won. The second fight was a toss-up I gave to Pacquiao, and the third fight was a draw.

i got it 1-1-1 Pac won first fight draw second Jmm won third

The 1st round does not have to be scored 10-6. Harold Lederman is a moron. Marquez was schooling Pacquiao in the first half of that round. I just felt that it did deserve 10-6, because of the 3 knockdowns. By my way of judging fights. It's interesting to note that JMM has only really been decisively beaten one time in his entire career.

Apparently a good argument can be made that Pac is 3-0 Or a good argument can be made that they're 1-1-1. Or a good argument can be made that they're 2-1 or 2-0-1 for either guy. Hell a good argument can be made that they're 0-0-3 This. Personally, I have it 3-0 for Pac. Marquez came closest in the 2nd fight.

I felt Marquez won the second and the third fights. In the first bout he won more rounds but the three knockdowns needed to properly be scored as a 10-6 round. So he should have lost that one. The 1st round does not have to be scored 10-6. Harold Lederman is a moron. Marquez was schooling Pacquiao in the first half of that round. The only fight Pac has a case for a draw is the first fight and thats only because of the KD's. He lost the 2nd and 3rd.

Had Marquez winning the 2nd fight and clearly winning the 3rd. Had no problem with the draw in the first fight.

He is undefeated against Pacquaio.

Best I had JMM getting was a Draw

Pac fan, but scored 2nd and 3rd fights for Marquez, both by 115-113. Can't remember how I scored first.

I scored the first for Pac and the last two for Marquez

I got the first for Pac, the second for Marquez, and the third for Pac... all close wins.