he did not say it directly but he implied. and i was stricly respinding to him not minding what others were talking about.
and i dont know what the point is for the rest of your post. i never said anyhting about the p4p being a fact.
Well obviously you didn't read the OP or understood what the OP was saying. You should read it again so you can see that I was answering how the OP was mistaken.
that was just stupid. makes me think ppl used to really have it in for roy in his prime.
I wouldn't say The Ring had it in for Roy...They just had a hard on for Oscar which is who they replaced him with. Pac
He never said you have to be undefeated to be #1 P4P. He like you didn't comprehend what the other were talking about.
P4P is a mythical based opinion. Not every list will be the same.
Some like the Ring took RJJ off #1 P4P spot after his DQ loss to Montell Griffin. But, he regained the spot months later after the 1st round destruction of Griffin in a rematch.
that was just stupid. makes me think ppl used to really have it in for roy in his prime.
who told you that you have to be undefeted to be p4p king? bhop would'nt have become one if thats the case.
and like comdeian said,pac hasnot lost since becoming p4p king.
He never said you have to be undefeated to be #1 P4P. He like you didn't comprehend what the other were talking about.
P4P is a mythical based opinion. Not every list will be the same.
Some like the Ring took RJJ off #1 P4P spot after his DQ loss to Montell Griffin. But, he regained the spot months later after the 1st round destruction of Griffin in a rematch.
Ain't that kinda unfair?
i dont think so. it depends on how you lost sometimes.
jmm lost to pac but he never really dropped in the ratings. and it's a great possibility if mayweather didn't unretire and pac retired back then, jmm would've been the #1p4p.