I'm going to say 10-9 Marquez. But would understand if it was a 10-10 round.
anyone saying that round 6 was an easy round for either fighter are just, I dont know what they are lolz, but that round was not easy to score, I could agree that its 10-9 for either fighter, watching it this time I gave it 10-10, if I watch it again I may score it differently...
you two guys are true pac loyalist
that 6th round is clearly a Marquez round
by any definition that you score a round for a boxer Marquez won that round
round 7 is a toss up round
anyone saying that round 6 was an easy round for either fighter are just, I dont know what they are lolz, but that round was not easy to score, I could agree that its 10-9 for either fighter, watching it this time I gave it 10-10, if I watch it again I may score it differently...
1st fight suppose to be pacquiao's win
not a draw
2nd fight
was a draw
going to pacquiao's is understandable because of the KD
but going to marquez? NO FREAKING WAY!
list your top 10 favorite fighters that Pacquiao hasn't fought
One judge also gave the 8th round to Pac which was the round in which JMM destroyed Pac.
And people wonder why this was a robbery.
all three judges scored the 8th for marquez.
I don't get it? Anyone that didn't score that for Marquez clearly, absolutely doesn't know how to score a fight. He won every minute of the round, landed more punches, landed the cleaner punches and landed the harder punches. He controlled the pace, the ring, his defence was better....In terms of how you score a round, Marquez had a clean sweep of the board in every category.
There is no way it could be anything other than a Marquez round. That includes personal preference, whether you score for the guy coming forward or for the more purist style of scoring. However you score, Marquez clearly and easily won that round.
It's not a close round though, so why ask, just out of curiosity?
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=514310
One judge also gave the 8th round to Pac which was the round in which JMM destroyed Pac.
And people wonder why this was a robbery.
yeah I think it was because JMM was winning most of the late rounds thats why. this was a clear 7-5 win for JMM unless you are very biased
I don't get it? Anyone that didn't score that for Marquez clearly, absolutely doesn't know how to score a fight. He won every minute of the round, landed more punches, landed the cleaner punches and landed the harder punches. He controlled the pace, the ring, his defence was better....In terms of how you score a round, Marquez had a clean sweep of the board in every category.
There is no way it could be anything other than a Marquez round. That includes personal preference, whether you score for the guy coming forward or for the more purist style of scoring. However you score, Marquez clearly and easily won that round.
It's not a close round though, so why ask, just out of curiosity?
Miller scored the fight 114-113 for Pacquiao gave the 6th 10-9 Manny, Ford scored the fight 115-112 Pacquiao gave the 6th 10-9 Manny
if you have 3 minutes to kill please score the 6th round much appreciated
starts at 5:40
I don't get it? Anyone that didn't score that for Marquez clearly, absolutely doesn't know how to score a fight. He won every minute of the round, landed more punches, landed the cleaner punches and landed the harder punches. He controlled the pace, the ring, his defence was better....In terms of how you score a round, Marquez had a clean sweep of the board in every category.
There is no way it could be anything other than a Marquez round. That includes personal preference, whether you score for the guy coming forward or for the more purist style of scoring. However you score, Marquez clearly and easily won that round.
It's not a close round though, so why ask, just out of curiosity?
But, your reasoning to such question. Is how did (insert poster name) score the 7th round for Pac, when all of the judges(2 of which you feel don't know how to score a fight) scored it for JMM. The irony of said question is pretty funny.
I'm not trying to discredit Pacquiao him and JMM gave us a classic fight nothing but respect for both guys and I didn't say the 2 judges don't know how to score either. just asking boxing fans input on the two rounds the judges disagreed on I don't know why pacquiao fans getting upset over this
this round can go either way also depends on how u view it
but i gave it to pac for more clearer blows
I didn't see clear blows from Manny in that round but he was getting countered early in the round the cut and the blood was because of a headbutt
This was no robbery. No matter what any hater tries to imply or wants to act like there was for sure winner. Both fights were extremely close and competitive. There was no robbery. It could have gone either way.
If someone scored the fight for Pac, they were not wrong. If someone scored it for JMM they were not wrong. And, I'm talking about either fight. That's how close and competitive the fights were. It could have gone either way. Stop implying that it was such a robbery.
Same goes for the idiots who believe Floyd-JLC I was a robbery. It wasn't, it was a close competitive fight that could have gone either way.
its not an argument its a question I made this thread because I was looking at the judges score card and the rounds they disagreed on was the 6th and 12th rounds. how did you score both rounds?
But, your reasoning to such question. Is how did (insert poster name) score the 7th round for Pac, when all of the judges(2 of which you feel don't know how to score a fight) scored it for JMM. The irony of said question is pretty funny.
my card = ledermans card with the 12 and 11 switched, if i remember it right
i know you all want to know how i scored it, you dont have to ask
Of course I don't. I already know you scored it 119-107 for Pac. :dance:
LOL @ this argument.
its not an argument its a question I made this thread because I was looking at the judges score card and the rounds they disagreed on was the 6th and 12th rounds. how did you score both rounds?