Is Khan number 1 at JWW now?

LMAO,Khan beats Judah(LOL)and that makes him the top dog..This is too funny...:omfg:

Yep. Until someone takes him down, Khan is the man.

Yes he is and its not even debatable,Bradley is a ducker and loses a lot of credibility for that

Alexander >>>> Judah over ther last 2 years

Clearly. Bradley forfeited the top spot by refusing the fight. Khan is the man to beat in the division now.

Bradley beat a hot Peterson, Holt, Alexander + a few others. I think he put in more work. Id favor those guys to beat Khns opponents. I think Timmy has some Hopkins in him, and will show Khan whats up

Bradleys inactivity at 140lb is what hurts him the most, 1 fight in 18 months (itll be 2 years when he steps in the ring, by which time Khan will have fought 6 times against ranked opposition) Name for name I know you'll go on and on and on about peterson and campbell etc etc but the fact is he's fought 1 stinker of a fight against a criminally over-rated Devon Alexander and couldnt even knock him out. Bradley has little chance against Khan without the power to go with his pressure style. Power is essential to beating Khan, because its very unlikely you'll outbox him, and even more unlikely you'll outwork him

So if both of their resume's are not that good we would have to go off of accomplishments..Bradley is more accomplished at the weight bro..So over all at best they are tied,saying Khan is num 1 flat out,hey it's ya opinion...But the fact remains Bradley(even with Khan's win yesterday)is more accomplish at Jr WW..That's the fact.. The only reason you think Bradleys is better is because you dont give Kotelnik and credit for being a good fighter, and you permanently highlight the 10th Round against Maidana. Kotelnik is probably the most under-rated win on Khan's resume, he already has a win over Maidana (when Marcos was undefeated) and shouldve beaten Alexander away from home. If Bradley had got to Kotelnik first and Khan fought Junior Witter, you'd claim Witter is another British hype job and Kotelnik was technically good blah blah blah You bend and mould the facts to make Bradleys resume better, when infact it isnt.

So if both of their resume's are not that good we would have to go off of accomplishments..Bradley is more accomplished at the weight bro..So over all at best they are tied,saying Khan is num 1 flat out,hey it's ya opinion...But the fact remains Bradley(even with Khan's win yesterday)is more accomplish at Jr WW..That's the fact.. Both hold 2 belts at 140. Resumes are pretty similar in my view. Khan would probably win head to head. Understand that I am not saying Khan is easily ahead, I am saying that I think he is fractionally ahead. As I said before, I understand the view that Bradley is number 1 and don't have a problem with people who have that view. **** is pretty close.

Ok cool, but Bradley's resume is no better than Khan's imo. Khan's resume isn't great, but it is solid for a 24 year old. Bradley's is no better and I think Khan would win in a head-to-head match up. Also, Bradley ARGUABLY ducked Khan. For these reasons I think Khan should be ranked at number 1 in the division. I think my views are reflected by most other posters as indicated by the results of the poll. However, I respect other peoples opinions and can see why people might have Bradley ranked slightly ahead. So if both of their resume's are not that good we would have to go off of accomplishments..Bradley is more accomplished at the weight bro..So over all at best they are tied,saying Khan is num 1 flat out,hey it's ya opinion...But the fact remains Bradley(even with Khan's win yesterday)is more accomplish at Jr WW..That's the fact..

absolutely......he show some skills.......i still dont like the guy (i was rooting for judah), but hes the best of the division........

Based off of what win? His best names are Maidana and Barrera, Barrera was old and shot, he didn't dominate Maidana. Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Salita, Judah, McClockey, none of these names really jump out at me except Malignaggi, and I had Khan winning easily over the rest of them. Bradley has Holt, in a fight I thought Bradley was gonna lose, I thought the Peterson fight was 50-50, I thought the Bradley fight was 50-50. I thought the Witter fight was more of a test than Judah was to Khan coming in, Witter hadn't lost in years and Bradley fought him in Nottingham where Americans are also going up against Judges. Bradley beat all of those guys pretty clearly. Why not rematch Maidana or fight Peterson instead of fighting McCloskey? Why didn't he ever rematch Prescott? It's that Freddie Roach match-making, making Khan look better than he is. He is very good, but he is looking great against guys he's supposed to beat easily. Holt and Alexander and Peterson are overated by you as they are american clearly kotelnik and malignalli are better than these guys

I'll correct you, yes you are wrong. I had Malignaggi over Khan, not Judah over Khan. I always said i'm rooting for Judah but Khan is gonna win. Khan's resume is overrated. Ok cool, but Bradley's resume is no better than Khan's imo. Khan's resume isn't great, but it is solid for a 24 year old. Bradley's is no better and I think Khan would win in a head-to-head match up. Also, Bradley ARGUABLY ducked Khan. For these reasons I think Khan should be ranked at number 1 in the division. I think my views are reflected by most other posters as indicated by the results of the poll. However, I respect other peoples opinions and can see why people might have Bradley ranked slightly ahead.

Not only is he #1 at 140 but he would be #2 at 147 after Pacquiao. Both Pacquiao and Amir KTFO outta Floyd and Ortiz.

Here you go. http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=10886521#post10886521 I'm in. I think Khan is gonna win. Judah is a very dangerous gatekeeper. I'm interested to see Mayweather vs Khan late in 2012 after Mayweather beats Pacquiao. Of course, if the whole OST BS gets sorted out. But if Judah wins, all the Mayweather talk would have to end for Khan. But while a loss to Judah would decrease his chances of fighting Floyd any time soon, it would increase his chances of fighting Manny Pacquiao.

khan is a much better boxer than bradley, i dont see how anyone could think any different. if you were allowed to nut people then bradley might stand a chance of being number 1. This, in a head-to-head matchup Khan would win IMO.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm sure you predicted Judah would win by KO. And Khan's resume is very underrated tbh. Khan is being matched against those against whom he is supposed to win according to you but he is being matched against the best. Timothy Bradley beat quitter Alexander who is overrated and should have lost his last three fights. Khan's Kotelnik win is way better than Tim's Alexander win IMO. I know Khan does well stylistically vs Kotelnik, but Kotelnik is very underrated on this forum due to his simplistic defence and lack of power. I don't rate Holt at all. Khan didn't fight Peterson due to money etc etc. I'll correct you, yes you are wrong. I had Malignaggi over Khan, not Judah over Khan. I always said i'm rooting for Judah but Khan is gonna win. Khan's resume is overrated.

khan is a much better boxer than bradley, i dont see how anyone could think any different. if you were allowed to nut people then bradley might stand a chance of being number 1.

Based off of what win? His best names are Maidana and Barrera, Barrera was old and shot, he didn't dominate Maidana. Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Salita, Judah, McClockey, none of these names really jump out at me except Malignaggi, and I had Khan winning easily over the rest of them. Bradley has Holt, in a fight I thought Bradley was gonna lose, I thought the Peterson fight was 50-50, I thought the Bradley fight was 50-50. I thought the Witter fight was more of a test than Judah was to Khan coming in, Witter hadn't lost in years and Bradley fought him in Nottingham where Americans are also going up against Judges. Bradley beat all of those guys pretty clearly. Why not rematch Maidana or fight Peterson instead of fighting McCloskey? Why didn't he ever rematch Prescott? It's that Freddie Roach match-making, making Khan look better than he is. He is very good, but he is looking great against guys he's supposed to beat easily. This,an tbh outside of the Witter fight Bradley has not had a close fight..He has dominated his opponents as well as Khan has...I say their either dead even at 1 or Bradley got him by an hair...

Based off of what win? His best names are Maidana and Barrera, Barrera was old and shot, he didn't dominate Maidana. Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Salita, Judah, McClockey, none of these names really jump out at me except Malignaggi, and I had Khan winning easily over the rest of them. Bradley has Holt, in a fight I thought Bradley was gonna lose, I thought the Peterson fight was 50-50, I thought the Bradley fight was 50-50. I thought the Witter fight was more of a test than Judah was to Khan coming in, Witter hadn't lost in years and Bradley fought him in Nottingham where Americans are also going up against Judges. Bradley beat all of those guys pretty clearly. Why not rematch Maidana or fight Peterson instead of fighting McCloskey? Why didn't he ever rematch Prescott? It's that Freddie Roach match-making, making Khan look better than he is. He is very good, but he is looking great against guys he's supposed to beat easily. Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm sure you predicted Judah would win by KO. And Khan's resume is very underrated tbh. Khan is being matched against those against whom he is supposed to win according to you but he is being matched against the best. Timothy Bradley beat quitter Alexander who is overrated and should have lost his last three fights. Khan's Kotelnik win is way better than Tim's Alexander win IMO. I know Khan does well stylistically vs Kotelnik, but Kotelnik is very underrated on this forum due to his simplistic defence and lack of power. I don't rate Holt at all. Khan didn't fight Peterson due to money etc etc.