Last night showed what happens when an Asian boxer like Khan puts on a horrific one sided beating of the "slick, slipperly" African American southpaw called Zab Judah.
Imagine Pacquaio v Mayweather, It would be even more one sided in the favour of Pacquaio, It will be a total demolition job by Pacquaio of Mayweather and thats why Mayweather will never take the fight.
Im sick and tired of Mayweather/Bradley/Alexanders/Mosley over hyped African American boxers who either duck opponents and stall using the excuse of rival promoters and OST, Quit in a fight because they want out, Or cash out in a fight they have no intention to even try to win and loose in an embarrassing fashion by throwing one lazy jab a round like a true African American.
Bernard Hopkins is the dying breed of the old generation of boxers that would fight everyone and anyone.
The thing about it is this, when an african american fighter wins a big fight its just reams and reams of posts and threads telling everyone how great they are, how great the style is, how bad the opposition was made to look etc etc, but when the boots on the other foot, they cant handle it, its just excuse after excuse trying to justify events in their heads
Exactly, If an African American wins a fight we never hear the end of it, Its a shame because lions like Bernard Hopkins who fight everyone and anyone never truly get the credit they deserve because hypejobs like Alexander/Bradley/Mayweather hog it all!
Be more like Bernard Hopkins ffs!
this is a boxing forum.....
but i could not help but notice posters referring to some bible stuff..
as in "no adam and eve"........
please do not dwell on something you could not prove...
thanks
It has been proved to be false, since the Bible puts Adam and Eve's time at 7000 years ago, and we know that humans and other civilizations pre-date this by some way.
Ain't no adam and eve dimwit, read up on evolution there were LOTS of original men but the oldest was African!
Same time Chinese and Mongolians (through trading on the Silk Road) share blood with Northern Indians and Pakistanis and South Asians share blood with South Indians, Bengalis, Sri Lankans and Sputh Pakistanis, through trading adventures on the high seas.
Pakistani friend of mine had one of them genetics blood tests and she had Chinese blood apparently.
So theres some similarities but NAA, we all the same really.
this is a boxing forum.....
but i could not help but notice posters referring to some bible stuff..
as in "no adam and eve"........
please do not dwell on something you could not prove...
thanks
Last night showed what happens when an Asian boxer like Khan puts on a horrific one sided beating of the "slick, slipperly" African American southpaw called Zab Judah.
Imagine Pacquaio v Mayweather, It would be even more one sided in the favour of Pacquaio, It will be a total demolition job by Pacquaio of Mayweather and thats why Mayweather will never take the fight.
Im sick and tired of Mayweather/Bradley/Alexanders/Mosley over hyped African American boxers who either duck opponents and stall using the excuse of rival promoters and OST, Quit in a fight because they want out, Or cash out in a fight they have no intention to even try to win and loose in an embarrassing fashion by throwing one lazy jab a round like a true African American.
Bernard Hopkins is the dying breed of the old generation of boxers that would fight everyone and anyone.
location: UK.
Shocking.
Any criticism of any African American boxer is automatically racist.
Take a break folks and admit that some African American boxers like Mayweather/Bradley/Alexander and so forth are grossly overhyped BECAUSE THEY ARE African Americans.
People like Bernard Hopkins never get the credit they deserve because its hogged by the other hypejobs.
The thing about it is this, when an african american fighter wins a big fight its just reams and reams of posts and threads telling everyone how great they are, how great the style is, how bad the opposition was made to look etc etc, but when the boots on the other foot, they cant handle it, its just excuse after excuse trying to justify events in their heads
simple question...the answer deads this corny debate in here....who's the ORIGINAL man?....what man was on earth first?!?...that deads the debate...simple sh!t....google the question...maybe the answer will pop up...bless!! :cool2:...WHO'S THE ORIGINAL MAN?
let me guess, you believe in the whole ancient egyptians were black theory?
lol
judah exposed khan's inaccuracy but if khan got dropped, hurt a couple times and lost a bunch of rounds then it would have been a dominant performance........right flomos?
I don't know what's more laughable; That Judah fights in any way like Mayweather, that Khan fights like Pac, or that this performance has any weight on how a Pac/May fight would play out.
PEDS, OST, Bob Arum, Goldenboy, $100 million, vacation, domestic violence and court appearances.
Slick black african americans are the most overrated group in boxing, there only slick when their winning and when they lose its just excuses and sour grapes
maybe tyson fury is slick as well, the big lump was switch hitting, moving his head, combination punches, slipping shots and he won too
I agree, but im just sick of hearing the hype about these "slick" fighters, They are slick only at avoided opponents.
Slick black african americans are the most overrated group in boxing, there only slick when their winning and when they lose its just excuses and sour grapes
maybe tyson fury is slick as well, the big lump was switch hitting, moving his head, combination punches, slipping shots and he won too
Pakistan was India, Pakistan was formed as a state for muslims, and muslims for around India were moved to Paskistan and non-muslims were moved out.
Ofcourse now they are two separate nations but like saying the North Korean and South Koreans are very different.
Germany was divided into East and West Germany but guess what East Germans were different from West Germans.
Zab is far from slick - but true, Khan is the way better fighter of him and Zab. Though I like how Zab has matured, but he's become a ***** in the ring though...
No I am aware of the war, but surely the tension that exists now after 60 odd years since this war has divided these people beyond reconsiliation? But Indians and Pakistanis are not the same national identity are they?
Pakistan was India, Pakistan was formed as a state for muslims, and muslims for around India were moved to Paskistan and non-muslims were moved out.
Ofcourse now they are two separate nations but like saying the North Korean and South Koreans are very different.
Never heard what went on in 1947 then.
No I am aware of the war, but surely the tension that exists now after 60 odd years since this war has divided these people beyond reconsiliation? But Indians and Pakistanis are not the same national identity are they?
do you feel racialy satisfied that zab was beaten? it sure comes across like you do.
Maybe thats a problem you if you feel like that, maybe you can point out what comment of mine make you feel that i'm racialy satisfied, whatever that means, and then I can correct you.
I was a bit disjointed to tell the truth, I thought Zab would have put up more of a fight.
Any criticism of any African American boxer is automatically racist.
Take a break folks and admit that some African American boxers like Mayweather/Bradley/Alexander and so forth are grossly overhyped BECAUSE THEY ARE African Americans.
People like Bernard Hopkins never get the credit they deserve because its hogged by the other hypejobs.
What are you? a top of the barrel racist.
But the thread does seem to be based on a racist premise.
do you feel racialy satisfied that zab was beaten? it sure comes across like you do.