Who won, froch or dirrell

Dirrell won no less than 8 rounds

I still see no reasoning for Froch winning based off what Froch actually did in the fight, complain about Dirrell all you want be he was clearly the more effective man in terms of putting effective punches on his opponent.

Dirrell won for me, but I can completely understand giving Froch the fight. Dirrell fought a dumb fight and waited too long to start turning it up, and it was a close fight up until that point. If you want to beat some guy in his hometown, you really have to lay it on him because he will get the benefit of the doubt most of the time.

dirrell easily won! i have no idea how people could give this one to froch. yea i agree he was running too much but he wasnt gettin hit and he was landing a lot on froch.

If you're not American, you scored it for Froch. Simple, really.

Direll won he landed more punches and cleaner shots, he didnt engage but he punished....

Dirrell landed the cleaner punches. He did display a p*ssy attitude and body language but that doesn't take away the fact that he was the better man that night. Plus he's a young dude and is still learning...he was much better and improved in the Arthur Abraham fight. It's impossible to truly win a fight with a ***** attitude/and or body language..Be real,I don't know how anyone can claim Dirrell won esp if ya seen this things in Dirrell that night.. AA style is nothing like Froch,Froch is always in position to counter punch which makes it harder for Dirrell to strike without getting caught himself..He did not get better he just fought a lesser fighter nothing more nothing less..

Froch won this fight,I score effective boxing not clinching and and falling..The most meaningful punches were landed by Froch..Froch push the action he won..Like I said I score effective boxing,what Dirrell did in that fight was not effective period..

Dirrell was robbed. Plain and simple.

Dirrell landed the cleaner punches. He did display a p*ssy attitude and body language but that doesn't take away the fact that he was the better man that night. Plus he's a young dude and is still learning...he was much better and improved in the Arthur Abraham fight.

Froch won, but i had Dirrell by a couple of rounds. I can see why they had Froch winning though, Dirrell ruined the fight and didn't deserve to win the title. Great great comment. I had Froch up by one point, but it was a close fight so I can understand that some people had Dirrell winning. But you actually made a great point, Dirrell ruined the fight by running all night long and by falling all the time ... it just wasn't a champions' performance.

Froch won, but i had Dirrell by a couple of rounds. I can see why they had Froch winning though, Dirrell ruined the fight and didn't deserve to win the title.

Froch you don't win world titles with kind of performance, Dirrell is much better than what he showed that nigh. He came in with the wrong strategy, he should have engaged more

^^^^not really since the current poll has froch winning against the running man.

Dirrell. I would have loved to give it to Froch but Dirrell pulled it out by sweeping the last three rounds.

Froch by one point ... if Dirrell actually would've tried to fight, he would've won, but nah, he just ran all night long.

Froch won. close but clear. Dirrell ran way too much.

froch. but i think you're a racist tool.