So... Morales was shot to pieces when Manny fought him!?

respect for Benny the poster but i think that is not accurate. Raheem was on bycicle the whole fight. even at the end of the fight Morales was still trying to engage. That fight is not even remotely close to what Morales gave away againts In Jin Chi. and you said that fight took everything he had left?????? Then what did Moraless dish out againts Maidana? did he made a deal with the devil for that last performance? or even the 1st 6 rounds of Pac II? You must be in a hurry while posting. Pac haters just use excuses all the time and try make a big deal out of the fact Morales lost one fight. But try not acknowledge all the other great fights Morales won! Should no boxer get credit for beating SRR then, just because he lost to Randolph Turpin and the others?

Rubbish. You've obviously never seen the fight. Morales took one of the worst, most sustained beatings he'd had to that point and was hurt quite badly several times. That fight took his heart, legs and just about everything else he had left. . respect for Benny the poster but i think that is not accurate. Raheem was on bycicle the whole fight. even at the end of the fight Morales was still trying to engage. That fight is not even remotely close to what Morales gave away againts In Jin Chi. and you said that fight took everything he had left?????? Then what did Moraless dish out againts Maidana? did he made a deal with the devil for that last performance? or even the 1st 6 rounds of Pac II? You must be in a hurry while posting.

Are you stupid a make no difference if both fighters are wearing the same gloves. Pac vs morales 1 would still end in a victory for morales even if pac had reyes on. Maidana would have not koed morales even with reyes. Some people are fukking stupid. would it have made that nasty first round uppercut that swelled up erik's eye a little bit more brutal though? i would believe so. gloves are made differently for a reason, they compliment different types of boxers with different approach. morales uses his superior technique and timing with his punches while preferring to not being cut up and wounded from an aggressive, hard hitting opponent. why else do you think he demands winning gloves for BOTH fighters? it's to suit his style and comfortability. i believe those grazing punches would've stung just a little bit sweeter had marcos been using what he does best with.

this is something pacquiao nuthuggers will never admit to. You two are idiots who possibly did not see the Raheem fight. Erik Morales received close to zero damage againts Raheem you morons :D Yes he lost the fight completely but all he got was a straight right hand right here and another one there from round to round. if anything the most damaging about the fight is running all around he ring chasing Zahir 'Fu_cking' Raheem.

Are you stupid a make no difference if both fighters are wearing the same gloves. Pac vs morales 1 would still end in a victory for morales even if pac had reyes on. Maidana would have not koed morales even with reyes. Some people are fukking stupid. Didn't Morales make Maidana wear those gloves tho? If it really made no difference then why would Morales demand Maidana wear them??

Maidana is a bit overated, as is Amir Khan. A lot of peeps at 140 are overrated. They are just good, but non are great. Thats why Morales, who probably also trained his ass off for this fight, did as good as he did. Morales in his prime is a GREAT fighter. At 140 and making a comeback, he's a "good" fighter. him losing to pac at 130 was probably a combination of him just realizing that Pacquiao was simply to hungry to lose at that point.

Gloves make a huge difference too. Pac Morales 1 they were using winning gloves... Against Maidana they were using the same gloves... I would have put my money on Maidana if they used Cletos or Everlast mx gloves. Are you stupid a make no difference if both fighters are wearing the same gloves. Pac vs morales 1 would still end in a victory for morales even if pac had reyes on. Maidana would have not koed morales even with reyes. Some people are fukking stupid.

Gloves make a huge difference too. Pac Morales 1 they were using winning gloves... Against Maidana they were using the same gloves... I would have put my money on Maidana if they used Cletos or Everlast mx gloves.

I'm a Morales fan before I'm a Pacquiao fan....event rooted for Morales in all three bouts. Morales wasn't shot in the first two bouts.....no shot fighter puts on those type of performances. Was he at his absolute best.....well obviously not, as 122-126 is where he was peaking at. Still he was a top 3 fighter in his division and Manny got full credit from me, with no excuses, when he beat Morales. I thought the third bout was unnecessary, but I hate it when people bring up Morales being drained when that was his fought not Manny's. Dude like to party and was starting to balloon up in between fights. How and why that was Manny's problem is beyond me and if, as a huge Morales fan, I'm not making excuses,

I definitely give Pacquiao a little more credit than I did because if an overweight shot to all hell Morales gives a fighter like Maidana that kind of fight, then he was definitely better 5 years ago. i could see that.....but then we surely have to give Mayweather mad props for smashing Corley toe to toe for 9 of the 12 rds. After all a shot Corley arguably beat Maidana. The Corley Floyd fought must have been some kind of monster.............LOL. Nope, Maidana, Khan, Alexander and Ortiz are all overrated. All have great potential but are flawed in some way or another.

I SMH at some of these responses. So what is the argument? That Morales looked good against Maidana therefor wasn't shot to pieces? Corley is shot to pieces and arguably beat Maidana like 9 months ago. So there goes that theory. Morales wasn't shot against Pac in the first fight. But, he wasn't the same Morales either, he wasn't prime. That is why Pac was the big favorite going into the fight. That was quite an upset actually. I have no beef with the 2nd Pac-Morales fight. It was OK. Just because I understand wanting to avenge a loss. The 3rd fight by that time yes Morales was shot. And, very well likely weight-drained as well. And, team Pac knew Morales was having a lot of trouble making 130. That's why team Pac WENT AGAINST COMMISSION RULES AND DEMANDED THEIR OWN WEIGHT PENALTY. There was no reason to demand such a penalty because Morales had never failed to make weight. But, team Pac knew that Morales could not really make 130 anymore so they insistent on a severe penalty just in case. Damn near forcing Morales to drain himself. Fact is the 3rd fight should have never happened period. It was a waste of time. And, Pac is greater than Morales. Is really not even close. good too see someone else is saying it. The arguments/conclusions should be this: - Maidana clearly struggles against slick/thinking boxers - the 140 division is overrated in it's entirety.

I definitely give Pacquiao a little more credit than I did because if an overweight shot to all hell Morales gives a fighter like Maidana that kind of fight, then he was definitely better 5 years ago.

too bad once he's gone you dog eating g00ks will be gone u *****s fail at sports 0 ****s in mlb,wwe,soccer,mma, etc no famous comedians actors, musicians your food sucks and you chanks are ugly Wow...this guy is asking for trouble...lol. What a dik! Check out his post history. Such anger...:scared: "peeleft:

Morales IS shot. Its just that Maidana was a perfect style matchup for him, thats why he specifically took the fight. lets not forget Maidana also struggled against a shot Corley as well. I hate it when fans try to give their fighter credit for another man's "victory".

Respect to two ATG's.. http://www.braggingrightscorner.com/pacmanmorales1_111806_cf.jpg

People seem to forget that Pac was the underdog going to the second fight. And Pac was considered too small at 130, and was being encouraged to move back down at 126.

funny coming from you. I checked your post history. you have NO posts that arent about Pac or Floyd. You mad ERIK :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

pactards are seriously dumb sons of b!tches ^^^^^^^^^:haha: The fookin' site idiot accusing somebody else of being dumb. I almost sharted my pants reading Mannie Phresh (dumbest member of BS) post. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

your sig just shows how much of a pacquiao nuthugger you are. First of all, morales had a hard time making weight the second time around, he wanted a catchweight and was denied it. Even hbo analysts were saying how bad morales looked physically during the pre fight build ups. BUT after about 5-6 rounds, those same HBO analysts were saying Morales looked good and perhaps 130 was too high for the smaller Manny. The reason is that at that point Morales was taking control of the fight and was headed for victory, IF it continued that way. Not long after the HBO commentators said that, Manny had a huge round in which changed the momentum completely. As for denying a catch-weight, they were fighting for a 130 (limit) division title.

And, that is what I refferring to. It was a waste of time just like the 3rd Morales fight. 2 garbage as fights that should not have happened. He should of fought Joan Guzman or Humberto Soto around this time. *sigh* Excatly, I am in agreement with you on both counts. I am just explaining why there is a 3rd fight. Soto and Guzman were good fights but they were not money fights like Morales, EM, and Marquez. Pac a needed a popular side B to compliment his popularity to boost up the PPV buys. And he can only get that by fighting MAB, EM, JMM. He couldnt headline a PPV on his own at that time.