Why was the fight ruled a KO? How did Vitali "stop" Solis?

Its not Vitali's fault that Solis's knee can't handle is body weight. By definition Vitali should've won by TKO because the ref had to stop the fight.

Idiotic statement. He lost his equilibrium when his head buckled, from a punch he didn't see coming. And he twisted his leg and got injured. GET OVER IT. Correct. If you are injured and you weren't fouled, you lose if you can't continue. One of the oldest rules in boxing.

His other leg was dancing the Charleston LOL. It's like sometimes when you've been on the beer for ages your head is completely tolerant of alcohol but your legs are shitfaced. A little chopping temple shot from Vitali is the equivalent of 13 pints of stella.

youre right, it should be a TKO, not a KO.

This should be ruled a no contest. Solis had his knee give out. It was a pathetic grazing punch, if one even landed, that got Solis. You can clearly see his knee gives out while he is still up.

Whether he did both knees, ankles, hip, pelvis... Solis was knocked down and looked totally out of it.

Solis was on queer street my friend. He was knocked down, and although his knee or w/e gave way, he was in all sorts of trouble when the temple shot landed. Vitali would have jumped on Solis after the knock down anyway, most likely stop him.

His other leg was dancing the Charleston

You didn't watch the same fight. The fight was stopped with Solis on his feet, one hand on the rope.

Solis got up before the count of ten. He was up at 7, but then the ref spotted him limping and stopped the fight. All of a sudden it is "Vitali knocked out Solis" "Solis was beaten". I don't accept those arguments because they are not true. Vitali did not KO Solis. Solis was down for the count, that's a KO.