Who is p4p no.1 Mayweather or Pacquiao?

Why in the world would Floyd even be an option!!!? Not down talking him, but he's NOT active & when he does come back it's for one fight & not against the best competition he can get. True P4P fight the best of best available. But I got Martinez slightly ahead of PAC or a tie.

I have Martinez as my number 1. Anyone who says Floyd is delusional. He hasn't even been active against bums to keep his place. He won't come back to boxing. If I had to choose between the two I gotta go with Pacquiao.

Sergio Martínez

No way Martinez is number, I would say Pacquiao hands down. Floyd isnt even active how can he be number 1.

Why is what martinez has done....better than what pac has done over the last 7-8 years? I just dont get it Well, all you have to do is to look at these people who wants Martinez to replace Pac. Ok. you right! the flomos!

1.Martinez 2.Pacquiao 3.Mayweather

Not my criteria for P4P, Martinez has been more consistent, has faced the tougher opponents as of late, to bring up last 7-8 years is hardly any different than comparing resumes, that's unfair. Ok, but I spoke about the last few opponents hes faced.... We all know Pac is growing into a Welterweight now, but he still is by far the smaller man, Against Cotto...Clottey and Marg And he still battered them, and now Mosley is his next opponent... forget the 7-8 years then.... I dont think Martinez faught tougher opponents than pac... He lost to Williams, and then Ko'd him, UD'd Kelly Pavlik and now beat Dzinziruk Yet hes saying if pac doesnt put in a good performance he should be number 1..... Personally i dont agree, fair enough everyones entitled to their opinions...but I really dont see how any1 could try say Pac isnt P4P number 1

Because Pacquiao is dominating so much right now, his competition is summed as as mediocre....yet if he wasnt so dominant....people would say they are still huge big named dangerous opponents... e.g. Mosley right now, is a terrible fight bla bla.... Yet hes probably the most dangerous out of all pacs last 3 opponents (Cotto was up there too) Sergio beat Pavlik....Who hopkins also beat and looked pretty sh1t.....he beat Williams who ok is great with punch volume, and would be a threat to all Welterweights but not because of his skill...but more of his height and reach combined with punch volume....(was an amazing KO tho so fair enough)... Pac is so great people are looking at his fights as if they are walk in the parks.... The fact is pac would dominate any1 from 140-147 bar mayweather, and he would probably KO every single 140 pounder without a doubt... I brought up the last 7-8 years because if anything hes improved, and yet he beat all those legends when he wasnt as great as he is now...That kinda sums up the level pac is on Not my criteria for P4P, Martinez has been more consistent, has faced the tougher opponents as of late, to bring up last 7-8 years is hardly any different than comparing resumes, that's unfair.

next time don't go to any flomo infested site so you won't get confused:nonono: Thanks to all that are voting, glad to see some fans know what they are on about. On that site because I think Pacquiao is p4p no.1, I get accused of being out of touch with reality by half the board.

martinez...........

Why is it that you bring up the last 7-8 years? Because Pacquiao is dominating so much right now, his competition is summed as as mediocre....yet if he wasnt so dominant....people would say they are still huge big named dangerous opponents... e.g. Mosley right now, is a terrible fight bla bla.... Yet hes probably the most dangerous out of all pacs last 3 opponents (Cotto was up there too) Sergio beat Pavlik....Who hopkins also beat and looked pretty sh1t.....he beat Williams who ok is great with punch volume, and would be a threat to all Welterweights but not because of his skill...but more of his height and reach combined with punch volume....(was an amazing KO tho so fair enough)... Pac is so great people are looking at his fights as if they are walk in the parks.... The fact is pac would dominate any1 from 140-147 bar mayweather, and he would probably KO every single 140 pounder without a doubt... I brought up the last 7-8 years because if anything hes improved, and yet he beat all those legends when he wasnt as great as he is now...That kinda sums up the level pac is on

I base my p4p ranking on percieved ability and recent performances, what do you guys base it on?

http://www.606v2.com/t2059p50-who-is-606v2-pound-for-pound-number-1 The reason for this article was this thread on another site. I found it strange that Mayweather was rated so highly despite his inactivity and Martinez could not get a look in. next time don't go to any flomo infested site so you won't get confused:nonono:

http://www.606v2.com/t2059p50-who-is-606v2-pound-for-pound-number-1 The reason for this article was this thread on another site. I found it strange that Mayweather was rated so highly despite his inactivity and Martinez could not get a look in.

I bet his not even top 10 in your book http://theradix.info/LEARN****/ebook.png actaully he is at # 4.... ahead of marquez, i say thats being generous!

Why is what martinez has done....better than what pac has done over the last 7-8 years? I just dont get it Why is it that you bring up the last 7-8 years?

...floyd aint even # 3 in my book..... I bet his not even top 10 in your book http://i955.photobucket.com/albums/ae34/mcbsouth/ebook.png?t=1300203539

Neither of them, it's Martinez. Why is what martinez has done....better than what pac has done over the last 7-8 years? I just dont get it

...floyd aint even # 3 in my book.....

Sorry I missed out Martinez was just having a debate with some people and just wanted to gage the opinion on the p4p rankings.