There was a slight uproar among some fans and boxing media when it was announced that THE RING’s vacant junior welterweight title would not be on the line when Timothy Bradley faced fellow undefeated 140-pound standout Devon Alexander on Saturday in Pontiac, Mich.
However, the so-called “controversy” over THE RING’s decision has disappeared now that the first major fight of 2011 is over.
Bradley (27-0, 11 knockouts) retained his status as the magazine’s No. 1-rated junior welterweight by out-pointing Alexander over 9 1/2 generally uneventful rounds. The Palm Springs, Calif., native won a unanimous technical decision when Alexander (23-1, 13 KOs) could not continue fighting after an accidental clash of heads in the 10th round.
Alexander was THE RING’s No. 3-rated junior welterweight prior to Saturday’s showdown but some fans and boxing writers considered him to be the second best 140-pound fighter, behind Bradley. Those fans and members of the media were not happy when THE RING’s editorial board decided that the title should remain vacant until the winner of Bradley-Alexander faced No. 2 Amir Khan, who had impressive victories over Andreas Kotelnik (who gave Alexander a tough fight last August) and Paul Malignaggi.
Khan’s last bout, against dangerous No. 4-rated contender Marcos Maidana, was the Boxing Writer Association of America Fight of the Year.
THE RING’s championship policy states that title vacancies are filled when a No. 1 contender faces the No. 2 contender in his weight class. However, in some instances a bout between Nos. 1 and 3 can be for the magazine’s belt.
That usually happens when the No. 2 contender is unavailable. Khan, who is scheduled to fight in April, will be available to fight the Bradley-Alexander winner later this year.
Prior to Saturday’s fight, most observers would’ve considered Khan vs. Bradley or Alexander to be an even fight. However, after Saturday’s lackluster affair, many of those same fans and insiders believe the British star would have the edge against either American, especially Alexander, who looked amateurish at times against Bradley and didn’t show elite-level mettle following the fight-ending clash of heads in the 10th round.
The manner in which the 23-year-old St. Louis native bowed out of Saturday’s bout convinced THE RING’s editorial board to demote him while rewarding another top contender who did exhibit elite-level heart in a recent loss.
“We have advanced Marcos Maidana over Alexander because, after comparing his loss to Bradley and Maidana’s loss to Amir Khan, it was clear that Maidana’s showing was far superior to Alexander’s,” said Nigel Collins, Editor-in-Chief of THE RING magazine. “There was disappointment in some quarters when THE RING declined to recognize the Bradley-Alexander match as being for the vacant RING junior welterweight title. But what transpired in that fight only reinforced our stance that a Bradley-Khan match is the best way to fill the vacancy.”
...HAHA you fuk
Maidana put a great effort, for some a winning one, against Kotelnik and a FOTY against Khan who got almost KTFO and pwnd on the inside.
Corley's best punch was a head butt which cut Maidana. no comparison at all.
Im not saying 140 is p4p the best division. It never was.
But its the deepest one with young talented up and comers in the moment.
a very young division which fighters have different styles, different personalities, huge talents. the best about it is they are fightin eachother. best is fightin the best in that division.
1.Bradley (the man to beat)
2.Khan (star and cash cow)
the next are close
3.Maidana (FOTY-boxer)
4.Kotelnik
5.Alexander
and I think that ranking could change very soon. thats what makes it interesting.
fukk off now
seriously, did Corley win that fight?
Corley won that fight just as much as Maidana won the Kotelnik and Khan fights.
I have no problem that Kotelnik beat Maidana, but in that time where the fight happened, Maidana wasnt ranked in the top 5...
Maidana got up in American rankings when he beat Ortiz and Cayo.
True, but he's top 5 now, there are no wins in Maidana resume of any fighter that was rank top 5 at the time or now.
Maidana improved and overtook Kotelnik at least with the Khan fight. thats my opinion.
Well he hasn't improve that much cuz' if he did he wouldn't have trouble with that version of Corley. I mean Jose Alfaro KO'd Corley FFS's.
I love the 140 division cuz its loaded with young talented fighters with different styles and personalties. all are still green (aside Kotelnik) and have their faults. that makes it very interesing. peace
140 is overrated IMO. Is not that deep. It really is just Bradley and Khan and the rest are eh..........
Well if we're talking about not officially winning, like we should then lets not mention Maidana fights against Kotelnik and Khan since he didn't officially beat them.
And, yes Alexander was a top fight guy at the time. Matter of fact Kotelnik has an official win over a current top 5 in Maidana. Maidana has zero official wins over any top 5 guy.
He got a hometown give against Maidana just like Maidana got a hometown gift against Corley. Which one is worse?
seriously, did Corley win that fight?
I have no problem that Kotelnik beat Maidana, but in that time where the fight happened, Maidana wasnt ranked in the top 5...
Maidana got up in American rankings when he beat Ortiz and Cayo.
Maidana improved and overtook Kotelnik at least with the Khan fight. thats my opinion. I love the 140 division cuz its loaded with young talented fighters with different styles and personalties. all are still green (aside Kotelnik) and have their faults. that makes it very interesing. peace
-which one was the more important fight........a tune up or Kotelnik's biggest fight
Well if we're talking about not officially winning, like we should then lets not mention Maidana fights against Kotelnik and Khan since he didn't officially beat them.
And, yes Alexander was a top fight guy at the time. Matter of fact Kotelnik has an official win over a current top 5 in Maidana. Maidana has zero official wins over any top 5 guy.
He got a hometown give against Maidana just like Maidana got a hometown gift against Corley. Which one is worse?
No you look as a resume in the division as a whole. Agree that also what you have done for me lately. And, Kotelnik arguably beat a top 5 fighter in his last fight while Maidana lost.
-whos dat top 5? overrated Alexander? he officially never beat him.
I can use that same argument that one shutout lost to Khan is no apocalypse since he proved against a prime Witter, Miadana, and Alexander.
-he has lost both fights and got a hometown gift against Maidana.:bigeyes:
I have a feeling that you do not understand the argument. Who compared Maidana to Urango? The comparison was Urango to Ortiz. Please pay attention.
-:fest30:
Why pick and choose the fight though? I mean if we can pick and choose the fight. Then I will pick....
Kotelnik performance against Alexander>>>>>>>Maidana performance against Corley.
-which one was the more important fight........a tune up or Kotelnik's biggest fight
bolded......................
no, youre lookin at it the wrong way man. you cant look for that single win and say that win is better than what he did the last 2 years.
No you look as a resume in the division as a whole. Agree that also what you have done for me lately. And, Kotelnik arguably beat a top 5 fighter in his last fight while Maidana lost.
one shtty performances against chop chop is no apocalypse since he proved against Khan what hes made of.
I can use that same argument that one shutout lost to Khan is no apocalypse since he proved against a prime Witter, Miadana, and Alexander.
I always support Kotelnik, but I have a feelin you hate Maidana. Maidana cant be compared with Urgano.
I have a feeling that you do not understand the argument. Who compared Maidana to Urango? The comparison was Urango to Ortiz. Please pay attention.
Im trying to use your arguments look now:
Maidanas shttyy win against chop chop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kotelniks one-sided defeat to Khan
Why pick and choose the fight though? I mean if we can pick and choose the fight. Then I will pick....
Kotelnik performance against Alexander>>>>>>>Maidana performance against Corley.
Yeah i reckon so.
Most everyone did.
The Alexander bubble should've realistically burst when Urango started figuring him out and if it didn't by then Kotelnik totally shattered it.
The Bradley fight wasn't even close imo and if anyone still thinks Alexander is anything but another hbo hypejob after all this they're a pathetic excuse for a boxing analyst.
You alright? Your not known for giving in easily :rofl: :rofl:
I wanna make up with you and start fresh. I've always thought we could be better friends.
:kiss:
You're giving Bradley too much credit. He isn't very good. Just a hard working overachiever.
Khan and Maidana both spark him.
yeah Im with you, but thats the ranking for the moment.
Ill be rootin for Maidana to beat Bradley and Im confident he does and I cant see Bradley beat Khan.
Its J.Lo man. He doesn't care about facts.
He only cares about his opinions and everyone else be damned. That wouldn't be so bad if he didn't pretend to be objective or knowledgeable.
Fine.
Maidana beat Kotelnik so that's impossible.
You alright? Your not known for giving in easily :rofl: :rofl:
You mean last year when he arguably lost to a shot to shit fighter in Corley? While Kotelnik arguably won against top 5 fighter in Alexander?
When you rank fighters look throughout the resume.
I will ask again what win does Maidana has that is better than Kotelnik has?
no, youre lookin at it the wrong way man. you cant look for that single win and say that win is better than what he did the last 2 years.
one shtty performances against chop chop is no apocalypse since he proved against Khan what hes made of.
I always support Kotelnik, but I have a feelin you hate Maidana. Maidana cant be compared with Urgano.
Im trying to use your arguments look now:
Maidanas shttyy win against chop chop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kotelniks one-sided defeat to Khan
top 3 are
1.Bradley (the man to beat)
2.Khan (star and cashcow)
3.Maidana (FOTY '10-fighter)
You're giving Bradley too much credit. He isn't very good. Just a hard working overachiever.
Khan and Maidana both spark him.
Im giving him facts, but he doesnt want to see them
the younger Maidana overtook Kotelnik last year, esp. with his performances, FOTY, against Khan, who also improved since he beat Kotelnik.
Its J.Lo man. He doesn't care about facts.
He only cares about his opinions and everyone else be damned. That wouldn't be so bad if he didn't pretend to be objective or knowledgeable.
He clearly ran from Campbell, so don't even come with that shit man. He resorted to running and winning on activity alone, that performance was as disgusting as Berto's against Urango. I remember how he walked up to Campbell to show him respect and Campbell wasn't having any of it, stuff was shameful. I thought he beat Peterson also, but clearly Peterson adjusted and had it been a 12 rounder...Peterson would have gotten the win IMO.
I'll leave you a message once I rewatch it.
Fine.
Yes, you are
Kotelnik > Maidana.......
Maidana beat Kotelnik so that's impossible.
Im giving him facts, but he doesnt want to see them
the younger Maidana overtook Kotelnik last year, esp. with his performances, FOTY, against Khan, who also improved since he beat Kotelnik.
You mean last year when he arguably lost to a shot to shit fighter in Corley? While Kotelnik arguably won against top 5 fighter in Alexander?
When you rank fighters look throughout the resume.
I will ask again what win does Maidana has that is better than Kotelnik has?
Undefeated against who? If Ngoudjo and Bailey are nothing fights then WTF are Ortiz wins?
Again, showcase could be another word for tune up on his hometown just like Maidana. Just because they were different countries could be the main reason where it was shown. For all we know it was shown on big time network in Argentina. Just like Alexander-Kotelnik was in the U.S.
That doesn't matter if you lose? And, what you're talking about could be a case of styles. Since styles make fights. When you rank fighters it should be about wins. And, Alexander has the better win between the two.
So there is no way Maidana should have been rank higher than Alexander prior to Bradley.
So what was your answer?
Again...no because Maidana went out and proved it was an off night by pushing yet another top fighter in Khan.
Alexander confirmed his overratedness on Saturday night.
Let me ask you, did you have Maidana ranked higher than Alexander prior to Maidana fight against Khan?
Ngoudjo and Bailey? Again...nothing fights. I really dont care. You're not telling me Juan Urango is better than Victor Ortiz. Its laughable. You mention his wins but what about his losses? Ortiz was undefeated and actually talented.
Undefeated against who? If Ngoudjo and Bailey are nothing fights then WTF are Ortiz wins?
Again, poor comparison. Alexander was being showcased on HBO in his hometown. Maidana was fighting in some Argentine shed. Also Maidana won. Alexander got outclassed.
Again, showcase could be another word for tune up on his hometown just like Maidana. Just because they were different countries could be the main reason where it was shown. For all we know it was shown on big time network in Argentina. Just like Alexander-Kotelnik was in the U.S.
Answer who has looked/performed better against the best fighters in the division - Maidana or Alexander?
That doesn't matter if you lose? And, what you're talking about could be a case of styles. Since styles make fights. When you rank fighters it should be about wins. And, Alexander has the better win between the two.
So there is no way Maidana should have been rank higher than Alexander prior to Bradley.