Pacquiao + Mayweather= Juan Manuel Marquez

WARR Marquez!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tua, you're a troll where the subject of JMM comes. JMM's resume has a who's who on it. Barrera (He was still going strong) Should've gotten the decision against Chris John Casa Diaz Katsidis Pacquiao both times win or not those fights propel his greatness. And I think he'd shatter Khan's glass jaw and beat Alexander's overrated ass. Bradley may be a closer fight. His resume is only gonna get better before he retires and you just need to deal with it. you're stupid if you think that's an atg resume.

what kind of mathematics is this? LOL 20 + 20 = 10 ? why are you surprised? this guy in bold has already scientifically proven that there are 11 yrs to a decade. makes sense. right now i'd say... jack = carlos slim + yesir.

what kind of mathematics is this? LOL 20 + 20 = 10 ?

Mayweather should not be mentioned with the likes.............of PAC and JMM...............PBF aint got sh1te....................compared with PAC and JMM...................... :439: I believe you...

**** Marquez. Never Compare Marquez to Floyd. Floyd bodied the crap out of him. INJECT you are stupid to ever mention Marquez in the same sentence as Floyd. Marquez is a dumb pee drinker, and thats all he will ever be.

pac > jmm pbf > jmm so, how can pac+pbf = jmm no matter how much you manipulate the math in there, you won't make that equation true just kidding ts. jmm is a great fighter but not yet in the ranks of pac/floyd. but imo, if he holds the status of pac now, he'll be a money grubber/cherry picker as well. Otherwise, we shouldn't be hearing of jmm-morales now. Also, just check out his attitude after pac-jmm 1. tsk tsk tsk.

Nobody in the game throws more text book perfect punches than Marquez, it's like watching an old master at work.

JMM is a precise puncher and his timing is great, great at recovering also. But his footwork is ****ty and he has no upper body defense. He looks like he has a ton of shiit bricks in his trunks the way he hops back and forth all the time. The better title of this thread is Pacquiao + JMM = Mayweather. He has the technical abilities of Marquez (and then some) and he is on the hand speed & conditioning level of a Pacquiao. yeah but your version would fall short of the purpose of this thread which is to annoint jmm as the 2nd coming of christ. at least in this thread. prepare to be rebuked! :eek:

Hes top 50 ATG. True Story. He had a phenomenal lightweight run. Casamayor Juan Diaz Katsidis Marquez looked good on all those fights with all GBP fighters.

Not entirely true, I've seen it said about Chavez too. "He ducked Frankie Randall for a 3rd bout". How do you duck someone you fought twice? When you get a gift technical decision and quit like Chavez did that night, there should have been an immediate rubber match. Not years later in a meaningless fight when both were over 40 and shot.

You can keep lying to yourself if it helps you sleep better at night. and you know you seriously don't want to compare the resumes. Maybe not as tough because Marquez was too good to fight like an idiot. But resume wise its not even close, especially after what he did with Katsidis last night. Go ahead and post that he beat Zaragoza and quit 2x against Pacquiao. :lol1:

in related news, the atlanta falcons got away with 1 today when the refs appear to have missed a call late in the game. we should egg the packer players to wear t-shirts that read... 'we beat the falcons today. we both should be 8-3'

Marquez is older than him and has been in just as many tough fights, so sorry that's not gonna cut it here. Morales is fighting bums and wishing he could fight Marquez right now, so no, he's not the better fighter and doesn't have a better legacy. He'll be remembered for losing to Barrera 2x and quitting 2x against Pac and losing to Zaheer Rahim. :lol1: That guy couldn't do anything past 130, JMM is dominating fighters that would've kicked his ass. You can keep lying to yourself if it helps you sleep better at night. and you know you seriously don't want to compare the resumes.

The difference is, Terrible actually beat Pacquiao, decisively even, after a career of going through wars. The difference is, Morales always was, always has been and always will be the fighter with the better legacy. The difference is, Morales didn't turn down fights and then cry about not getting his turn. He took his opportunities when they were there instead of being a stubborn dumbass and getting peanuts to take a loss. Marquez is older than him and has been in just as many tough fights, so sorry that's not gonna cut it here. Morales is fighting bums and wishing he could fight Marquez right now, so no, he's not the better fighter and doesn't have a better legacy. He'll be remembered for losing to Barrera 2x and quitting 2x against Pac and losing to Zaheer Rahim. :lol1: That guy couldn't do anything past 130, JMM is dominating fighters that would've kicked his ass.

he has a chin jsut because he get knocked down dont mean he doesnt have a chin. he gets up and is never buzzed or stoped dude is tough. he is a complete fighter

Maybe if you don't know how to score a fight. You probably think Williams beat Martinez too. The difference between Morales and JMM is that when JMM goes down, he gets back up. Morales quit worse than Cotto. The difference between JMM and Barrera is that JMM actually won a round and didn't get the fight stopped by his corner. The difference is, Terrible actually beat Pacquiao, decisively even, after a career of going through wars. The difference is, Morales always was, always has been and always will be the fighter with the better legacy. The difference is, Morales didn't turn down fights and then cry about not getting his turn. He took his opportunities when they were there instead of being a stubborn dumbass and getting peanuts to take a loss.

0-1-1 says it all. official scores don't count johnny. what the hell is wrong with you? :pat:

0-1-1 says it all. Maybe if you don't know how to score a fight. You probably think Williams beat Martinez too. The difference between Morales and JMM is that when JMM goes down, he gets back up. Morales quit worse than Cotto. The difference between JMM and Barrera is that JMM actually won a round and didn't get the fight stopped by his corner.

no doubt, some pactard coward. I should ask him for a catchweight before he posts in my threads. geez, i like jmm myself but his penchant for crying/whining is turning me off. no need to ask for catchweights jack since i don't plan on creating threads for shock value alone which is what you're good for. jmm is a legend no doubt. but like i mentioned once already, he's also a legendary sore loser. if that makes me a pactard in your trolling eyes so be it.