Martinized vs Hattonized

The Pwill-Martinez last weekend was indeed one of the most dominating one punch knock out in recent years. I was rooting for Pwill but anyway, now we can add the word "Martinized" in the knock-out vocabulary. Moreover, it was eerily similar with what happened with the Pac-Hatton fight : 1. both ended in 2 rds, 2. pwill/hatton came in forward style aggresively, and 3. both were seemingly not able to see the shot coming. One noticeable difference was that Pwill fell flat on his face while Hatton fell lying on his back :D. In your opinion, which knock-out was better overall and how are they different? this question might be very vague but i would like you guys to throw some ideas like for eg., the fashion on how the knock-out was set up from when the bell rang up to that point it was executed, boxer skill sets, physique, speed, timing, executiion, or even worst, which one was just a lucky shot. In my opinion, the pac-hatton fight was like more of a confusion and surprise on the part of hatton on the thought that prior to the knock-out, he was eating pac`s right hook (which i think was just newly added to his arsenal at that time) and that messed hatton up mentally and was forced to guard and be concerned his left face more, eventually leading to his demise. To me, it sounded like a solid gameplan which was executed to the letter. Meanwhile, the Pwill-Martinez fight, well i dont know how to describe it, they were clinching so much for most of the times, with each one trying to outdo each other and just keep bashing and bashing and rough when they hold (which is normal). sorry, if this is not so constructive but what the heck i was rooting for Pwill and just lost my very first three bets made in BS grrr:dead1:. if there was a set-up made by martinez, maybe I was not too keen when I watched it. maybe you guys have better ideas. :boxing: