Shannon Briggs -No slave contracts with Klitschko's-Haye is just afraid! ***VIDEO

Wlad deserve way more money than gaye basically bcz he the best heavyweight out there and have 3 belts . gaye only fough old valuev and j Ruiz and he thinks hes on top of the world lol Gaye is a joke

Shannon also fought once in K-1 cuz he couldnt get a fight in boxing! Point being is that Briggs's idea of a 'slave contract' differs from Haye's idea of a 'Slave contract'. One desperately needs the coin and the other doesn't.

TBF, Shannon Briggs would fight Wlad/Vitali in a nappy if the price was right. Shannon also fought once in K-1 cuz he couldnt get a fight in boxing!

Nobody is buying that slave contract bull****. Haye is just a coward!

TBF, Shannon Briggs would fight Wlad/Vitali in a nappy if the price was right.

Wrong. Peter fighting Vitali was NOT part of any Wlad contract. Can you provide evidence otherwise? Also, please provide links proving what you're saying about Byrd. If Byrd was treated so badly, why is it he readily signed to fight Wlad again? Glutton for punishment? http://www.blogtalkradio.com/on-the-ropes/2010/05/31/on-the-ropes-episode-75-guests-chris-byrd-michael-katsidis Here's your link bro. Start listening at exactly 40 mins in and Byrd goes into detail of the Klitschko slave contracts. ...This is about the mechanics of the Klitschko slave contracts, not psycology of Chris Byrd.

EDIT: The reason the slave clause was so heavily enforced on Haye is because he is by far the most dangerous HW out there. He has the power to crack Wlads chin and the youth to put Vitali in a coffin. If they could do a deal where both sisters could fight him at the same time believe me theyd try... Mr Blobby = David Gay JoeyZagz = His Trainer. Haye is a joke who shouldnt even be offered 50/50 and should be happy with 60/40 since he has no fans outside UK. He got offered 50/50 and refused it? what a wanker and a pansy. Klit Brothers have always been respectful to their opponents and dont trash talk and just take care of business. Haye is running around talking mad trash and when he was presented the opportunity he ran away with excuses. Now the brothers signed fights this wanker opened his mouth again saying he was going to expose the slave contracts which is yet another lie. Anyone who fights the brothers it will be their biggest pay day including Gaye and if he beats one of them then the rematch will be a crazy seller. I guess his doo-rag is blocking some oxygen to his pansy brain. Haye why dont you try to unify all the titles instead of being scared? Or do people like Mr. Blobby suck you off at night in pink doo-rags and tell you what a man you are and you dont need to fight the brothers?

1. Byrd was the one who gave us first-hand accounts of the slave contracts. He wasnt allowed tune-up fights or exhibition matches after he made Vitali tap! He was ordered to rust in a corner until Wladimir was ready for him. 2. You only have to fight the other brother if you win/and or embarrass one of them like Peter did Wlad in 2005. 3. See number 2 Wrong. Peter fighting Vitali was NOT part of any Wlad contract. Can you provide evidence otherwise? Also, please provide links proving what you're saying about Byrd. If Byrd was treated so badly, why is it he readily signed to fight Wlad again? Glutton for punishment?

1. Byrd was the one who gave us first-hand accounts of the slave contracts. He wasnt allowed tune-up fights or exhibition matches after he made Vitali tap! He was ordered to rust in a corner until Wladimir was ready for him. 2. You only have to fight the other brother if you win/and or embarrass one of them like Peter did Wlad in 2005. 3. See number 2 EDIT: The reason the slave clause was so heavily enforced on Haye is because he is by far the most dangerous HW out there. He has the power to crack Wlads chin and the youth to put Vitali in a coffin. If they could do a deal where both sisters could fight him at the same time believe me theyd try...

Really? How come Chambers, Arreola, Ibragimov, Byrd, and 20 other fighters 1) NEVER complained about slave contracts. 2) NEVER had to fight the brother. 3) NEVER fought rematches. Answer the questions. 1. Byrd was the one who gave us first-hand accounts of the slave contracts. He wasnt allowed tune-up fights or exhibition matches after he made Vitali tap! He was ordered to rust in a corner until Wladimir was ready for him. 2. You only have to fight the other brother if you win/and or embarrass one of them like Peter did Wlad in 2005. 3. See number 2

No, he's really serious about defending him. Serious or not, I try never to make it a point to debate with anthropomorphic pink blobs from mid nineties Saturday evening British gameshows. It demeans the soul.

this Blobby guy is just messing with ya'll quit talking to him. No, he's really serious about defending him.

this Blobby guy is just messing with ya'll quit talking to him.

This right here....:repost: Really? How come Chambers, Arreola, Ibragimov, Byrd, and 20 other fighters 1) NEVER complained about slave contracts. 2) NEVER had to fight the brother. 3) NEVER fought rematches. Answer the questions.

I'm just getting the facts out there, Haye didn't go into hiding it was Wlad the walked away from negotiations. Yeah right. What happened when Haye lied about a back injury? Can you make some excuse for that? You're about the only one defending the guy, which is crazy, but still, what happened there?

Haye said he'd "Beat both klitschkos in the same night" Haye then said "I want 50/50" He said one thing; changed his mind and got that. But you keep defending him. I think you're just looking for arguments. I'm just getting the facts out there, Haye didn't go into hiding it was Wlad the walked away from negotiations.

Obviously he's going to be much happier to accept a **** contract because he isn't a draw at all. This right here....:repost:

Haye said Klitschko could keep the German money and he keeps the UK and Wlad walked away. Haye said he'd "Beat both klitschkos in the same night" Haye then said "I want 50/50" He said one thing; changed his mind and got that. But you keep defending him. I think you're just looking for arguments.

Wladimir offered Haye a 50-50 revenue split with no rematches. That's not a slave contract. But the craven Haye just hid under his bed for a couple of months. :lame: Haye said Klitschko could keep the German money and he keeps the UK and Wlad walked away.

You are right it isnt technically a rematch. However, when you have the ability to ask for one, you should. Look, any fighter can lose on any given night. You walk into the wrong punch, your strat is to let a guy wear down and just as he does an accidental headbutt stops the fight and you lose on a td, anything can happen. So why wouldnt they put those clauses in, especially with a guy like Haye who would probably duck the other and try to enforce some crazy split. Can you imagine if Haye beat Wladimir what kind of split he'd ask for Vitali? Haye would probably ask for 70-30...or maybe not even that generous. A guy like Vitali couldnt accept and then Haye would be free to fight Tyson Fury. To try and make someone fight someone else if you lose it complete BS, it wouldn't be acceptable for other fighters to put clauses like that in contracts but we should allow the Klitschko's just because they are brothers?