Does this make Froch look better?

Basically I see Froch get a lot of **** on here and everywhere because he has a slow robotic style that isn't appealing and in his recent 3 fights he hasn't looked the best, but do you think the fact that Froch beat Pascal and Pascal beating Dawson makes him better than what we might think he is? I know triangle theories mean jack **** and I agree with that, but still im starting to think he cant be that bad if hes beaten the guy thats now one of the best guys at LHW. Don't get me wrong, I have been hard on Froch just lately and I don't really like him after the amount of **** he talks about Calzaghe to make himself look big... but maybe we are underrating him a little bit?

Comments (8)

street_bully

Not at all that was 168, and Froch is a tailor made opponent for someone like Dawson, this fight made Pascal look better no one else. Also Froch lost his last two fights and will lose against Abraham.

15y ago

Owlzfan84

Froch is a very good fighter. He's faced a lot of talent and has always been in the fight or won. Doesnt matter who you are 160-175, if your facing Froch your going to have a tough fight on your hands.

15y ago

southcentralcar

fake hair pecs :banana: http://static.boxrec.com/wiki/6/67/Froch.Carl.jpg

15y ago

Gorilla_Dogs

no. pascal is a different fighter than the one that fought froch. froch came off a big loss and arguable a loss in some ppls eyes to dirrell.

15y ago

Spacey1991

i always knew Spacey was a Froch nuthugger :lol1: ****, you caught me out! :D Arthur Abraham got knocked down by Dirrell and got hit left, right & centre. AA would be a dumbass If he thinks he could just stand there trying to pull of his best Clottey against someone that is much taller and can hit. If someone is Knocking Out Arthur Abraham, then it's gonna be Froch. Whether he will I don't know, but I wouldn't bet on it... But there's a good chance, something that people aren't giving Froch. And I'm not a Froch Fanboy Dirrell > Froch I had Dirrell beating Froch by 1 point from what I remember, maybe 2. True, if anyone has the power to do it then its him.

15y ago

Water

Froch is defiantly half descent, some are underestimating his ability. I still think Froch may even beat AA yet, let's say if he does then Yes he's been vastly underated.

15y ago

Spacey1991

No this makes Froch look better http://photo.maxim.co.uk/images/library_UK_213/miss_maxim_2007_winner_106860_12.jpg Congratz to their newly born child. So true, shes fukking hot! :D He is underrated. He can throw a great lunging uppercut and throws unexpected punches from distance. He understands the distance of his opponent well and has a very good chin and power. he also carries his power through 12 rounds. He has many flaws but people talk about him as if he's utterly useless and never deserved any of his wins. Good point... people say hes ****, but he cant be that bad if he won a world title.

15y ago

eli_porter

He is underrated. He can throw a great lunging uppercut and throws unexpected punches from distance. He understands the distance of his opponent well and has a very good chin and power. he also carries his power through 12 rounds. He has many flaws but people talk about him as if he's utterly useless and never deserved any of his wins.

15y ago