Come on now. Khan isn't better than Froch even though he's more skilled. Let's not get carried away. A shot version of Ricky Hatton beat Paulie the exact same way.
Quit talking about guys like Froch and Haye. Khan is the trut, he just has a chin that will always hold him back,
what about the chin he still hasnt proven he can take a big punch
Khan is way more gifted that any other British fighter outthere. His chin isnt top notch, but he has the skills to get away with it more often then not. Esp at 140, he's huge and has range. Speed and power, too.
I just wish both of them had good chins like Carl Froch.
David Haye is the standard bearer for boxing in Britain now.
If he ever actually fights a bloody Klitschko and does well then boxing is going to go BOOM! in this country.
Both guys are very important to the overrall health of British boxing. In regards to general interest, crossover,television coverage. If you're a fan of British boxing you have to want both to do well.
Anyway, I digress. Amir Khan is a better fighter in my opinion, elite speed, more active, gets hit less, better combination puncher, a commitment to a jab. A determination to stick to a gameplan.
Khan is still gonna get KO'd against a guy like Maidana though and Amir Khan's turds have more talent than Maidana. His chin is guilty.
Kell Brook is the sleeper. He does not get the publicity but I rate him above Khan. We have yet to see Khan in a competative fight that is not a forgone conclusion. Untill you see fighters in those type of fights it is hard to determine what you are looking at.
Quit talking about guys like Froch and Haye. Khan is the trut, he just has a chin that will always hold him back,
Former Undisputed and RING CW, and Current WBA HW Champion David Haye>> Amir Khan WBA Jr. WW champion
It is not even close.
Yeah he is alooooot more skilled then Froch and Haye... I was thoroughly impressed tonight... Though I still don't think he will beat Bradley or Alexander, no way I see that