Flomos are crying with their idol Fraud Gayweather that they gave Manny his Fighter Of The Decade award. Flomos please be prepare for the grand finale in June when congressman Manny Pacqquiao does walk up to recieve the award, your idol Gayweather will cry harder than we have ever seen him before...Ohh it's gonna hurt so much, ya better comfort Floyd before he flood his house.
LOL, NYAHAHAHA. I know they just did this hating to ease the jealousy and bitterness that they feel but they will be all crying when pac will recieve his award this coming june. nyahahahahha
Flomos are crying with their idol Fraud Gayweather that they gave Manny his Fighter Of The Decade award. Flomos please be prepare for the grand finale in June when congressman Manny Pacqquiao does walk up to recieve the award, your idol Gayweather will cry harder than we have ever seen him before...Ohh it's gonna hurt so much, ya better comfort Floyd before he flood his house.
are you trying to say that rjj's accomplishments is shit compared to other fighters of his era but he got the fotd because he got better skills? can you name one fighter back then who has better accomplishments than rjj?
wtf are you talking about...when did I say anything close to that..
again..you are the one claiming it had nothing to do with skill..
I am telling you his skill was most definately considered, because he was facing opponents that people gave him crap over..he always said himself it wasnt his fault the level of opponents that were in his weight class..
I just tore your theory to shreds..you named me Ruiz and B-hop which I disected..so you decide which is it..
lmao..talking in circles..which is it?..did RJJ get his award based off skill or the fact he fought bums..he didnt even fight Ruiz until 03 dumb ass..that wasnt considered in his FOTD award..stay on point here!!!
and Hopkins wasnt a consideration in his award either..B-hop finally got his due after he beat Tito..but guess what..that happened after RJJ got FOTD..so I guess RJJ got his award cause he fought Toney and Hill then..
I guess his skill had nothing to do with it at all...:lol1:
now slap yourself and come back with another logical theory..
I fucking :headbang:
are you trying to say that rjj's accomplishments is shit compared to other fighters of his era but he got the fotd because he got better skills? can you name one fighter back then who has better accomplishments than rjj?
lol another follow up to your stupidity...true rjj fought a lot of bums in his career but he also beat the likes of hopkins, toney, hill and even ruiz at heavyweight. nobody has top that in his era and so he deserved fotd. it's all about his accomplishment not his skills. the same thing with pac...his accomplishements is better than anyone else that's why he got fotd. that's very simple actually i don't know why you're finding it hard to understand:pat:
lmao..talking in circles..which is it?..did RJJ get his award based off skill or the fact he fought bums..he didnt even fight Ruiz until 03 dumb ass..that wasnt considered in his FOTD award..stay on point here!!!
and Hopkins wasnt a consideration in his award either..B-hop finally got his due after he beat Tito..but guess what..that happened after RJJ got FOTD..so I guess RJJ got his award cause he fought Toney and Hill then..
I guess his skill had nothing to do with it at all...:lol1:
now slap yourself and come back with another logical theory..
I fucking :headbang:
Only one loss during the decade, dolt. A loss that he avenged twice over.
He only had a draw because one of the judges mis scored the first round.
I suggest you :shootself:.
if 1 point "judging error" is gonna make or break a fight..that tells me Pac was NOT dominating anything..not to mention he only won the remtach by a 1 point split decision..dude was clearly outboxed by JMM both times..
wtf are you talking about..RJJ won FOTD..and he was always getting shit over the opponents he faced..so there goes your theory...
lol another follow up to your stupidity...true rjj fought a lot of bums in his career but he also beat the likes of hopkins, toney, hill and even ruiz at heavyweight. nobody has top that in his era and so he deserved fotd. it's all about his accomplishment not his skills. the same thing with pac...his accomplishements is better than anyone else that's why he got fotd. that's very simple actually i don't know why you're finding it hard to understand:pat:
3 losses 1 draw and a BS decision over marquez clearly he deserves a slap in the face for even being mentioned
Only one loss during the decade, dolt. A loss that he avenged twice over.
He only had a draw because one of the judges mis scored the first round.
I suggest you :shootself:.
And how did Floyd dominate in this decade? By fighting girls? Great skills no doubt but he didn't put it to the test, not his fault tho....there weren't many HOF in his division. If there was, would he fight them? You literally have to drag him to fight Mosley.
as opposed to Mosley begging Roach for a fight at 142..and Team Pac still rejecting because "hes too good a fighter"..yeah Pac really tests himself..
:lol1:
FOTY and FOTD does not go to has more skilled. Because, honestly was not the most skilled fighter in the 90's. Ricardo Lopes was the best fighter in the 90's if we are going by skill. But, of course he didn't deserve it cuz he didn't achieve what Roy achieve he didn't fight the type of level comp that Roy fought.
Skill wise Floyd is better. But, Pac achieved more during the whole decade that made him deserve the award.
okay cool
this post right here has stupidity written all over it. awards, accolades, citations, etc. are given based on what you have done and not about what you can do. true floyd's skills is better but pac has accomplished more. typical floyd fans like you are always pointing out skills in their arguments but skills can only be relevant if you can turn it into good accomplishments. i'm not saying floyd's accomplishement is not good, in fact it is very good, it just so happened that pac has accomplished more. a less-skilled fighter who has done more than the better-skilled is more than commendable. pac deserved the FOTD and it doesn't matter how you try to twist it.
wtf are you talking about..RJJ won FOTD..and he was always getting shit over the opponents he faced..so there goes your theory...
RJJ deserved his..he dominated during his reign..and his skill was unmatched..Pac did not deserve it..he did not dominate..and he is not as good as Floyd whatsoever..to compare RJJ FOTD and Pacs is a disgrace..
serious question..do you really think Pac is better than Floyd?
this post right here has stupidity written all over it. awards, accolades, citations, etc. are given based on what you have done and not about what you can do. true floyd's skills is better but pac has accomplished more. typical floyd fans like you are always pointing out skills in their arguments but skills can only be relevant if you can turn it into good accomplishments. i'm not saying floyd's accomplishement is not good, in fact it is very good, it just so happened that pac has accomplished more. a less-skilled fighter who has done more than the better-skilled is more than commendable. pac deserved the FOTD and it doesn't matter how you try to twist it.
He just need 9 1/2 years to go:boxing:...
This thread was absolutely hilarious!
No seriously is was... well done you!
I'm still laughing at how funny you are!
I mean how clever, posting the same shit you've been saying in other threads in your own thread, hilarious.
If you haven't already noticed, I was being sarcastic.
RJJ deserved his..he dominated during his reign..and his skill was unmatched..Pac did not deserve it..he did not dominate..and he is not as good as Floyd whatsoever..to compare RJJ FOTD and Pacs is a disgrace..
serious question..do you really think Pac is better than Floyd?
FOTY and FOTD does not go to has more skilled. Because, honestly was not the most skilled fighter in the 90's. Ricardo Lopes was the best fighter in the 90's if we are going by skill. But, of course he didn't deserve it cuz he didn't achieve what Roy achieve he didn't fight the type of level comp that Roy fought.
Skill wise Floyd is better. But, Pac achieved more during the whole decade that made him deserve the award.
That is not true right there. See that is a way to taking away Pac achievement. He only won that cuz he is more popular, or poor Floyd everyone is against him. A bunch of nonsense. if FOTY and FOTD were to go to his the most popular then Oscar De la Hoya would of won FOTD in the 90's. Because, there was no other fighter in the 90's more popular than Oscar not named Tyson. But, Roy won FOTD. It was not cuz he was more popular cuz he wasn't. It was because he deserved it and Oscar didn't.
To say that is popularity is saying that Pac didn't deserve it. Which is untrue he did deserve it.
And, FOTY and FOTD is different from P4P. P4P is an opinion of if Roman Gonzalez and Steve Cunningham were the same size then who wins. Obviously we don't really know the answer so we go by opinions.
But, FOTY is based on that year who did the best work. FOTD goes during the whole decade who did the best work. Is not about popularity if it was about popularity then Floyd would not have been P4P for so many years. If it is true that the establishment has it out for Floyd then they would not have Floyd on the P4P list for so many years. Remember the same people who had Floyd at #2 P4P over 10 years ago are the same people who had Pac winning.
RJJ deserved his..he dominated during his reign..and his skill was unmatched..Pac did not deserve it..he did not dominate..and he is not as good as Floyd whatsoever..to compare RJJ FOTD and Pacs is a disgrace..
serious question..do you really think Pac is better than Floyd?
if vernon hadnt gotten injured he wouldve had a better career..anyway i rate floyd higher than manny now anyway
Why are you refusing to answer the question?
What about when Vernon was healthy do you rank Mayorga higher than Vernon?
Who do you rank higher Saddler or Pep?
Tyson or Douglas?
Tarver or Jones?
Tito or WInky?
Duran or Hagler?
Duran or Hearns?
Arguelly or Pryor?