FROCH and KESSLER automatically destroys him?? lmao kids these days
wtf ever happened to STYLES MAKE FIGHTS? does that just go out the window when a fighter loses?
bottom line is:
Sergio Martinez/ Bernard hopkins= Great fukkin BOXERS
Mikkel Kessler/ Carl Froch= NOT GREAT FUCKIN BOXERS!
so plz- break this down... HOW IN HELL DOES FROCH "DESTROY" KELLY PAVLIK? kESSLER?
FROCH and KESSLER automatically destroys him?? lmao kids these days
wtf ever happened to STYLES MAKE FIGHTS? does that just go out the window when a fighter loses?
bottom line is:
Sergio Martinez/ Bernard hopkins= Great fukkin BOXERS
Mikkel Kessler/ Carl Froch= NOT GREAT FUCKIN BOXERS!
so plz- break this down... HOW IN HELL DOES FROCH "DESTROY" KELLY PAVLIK? kESSLER?
people are gonna think that after kelly just lost....first guy who kelly lost to was a 43 year old hopkins and ever since then people have been taking the piss so their going to be like that then..
FROCH and KESSLER automatically destroys him?? lmao kids these days
wtf ever happened to STYLES MAKE FIGHTS? does that just go out the window when a fighter loses?
bottom line is:
Sergio Martinez/ Bernard hopkins= Great fukkin BOXERS
Mikkel Kessler/ Carl Froch= NOT GREAT FUCKIN BOXERS!
so plz- break this down... HOW IN HELL DOES FROCH "DESTROY" KELLY PAVLIK? kESSLER?
Kids these days? You're only in your teens. :lol1:
Yeah, it's not as cut and dry as people want to make it seem. Boxing fans are what have you done for me lately and they forget what a fighter can do.
As of right now I would favor Froch and Kessler, but I would not dismiss changing my pick to Pavlik.
Kelly Pavlik=Great ****ing boxer right???
No he ****ing doesn't and im a Pavlik fan as well, Froch/Kessler are bigger and stronger i would back Froch by KO over Pavlik in a short war and Kessler by wide UD..
lol i never said that pavlik was a great boxer... i said he lost to two great boxers, and ppl go and think hell lost to ppl who arent great boxers, which makes no sense....