Andre Dirrel on Joe Calzaghe

What a fool that interviewer was, he bring up Roy Jones and says when he was fighting the likes of Brian Brannon Lol.

What I mean is Dirrell hasn't shown a great performance so far against an opponent even close to Calzaghe's caliber, and against Froch who is a far inferior opponent than Calzaghe, he lost, even if it was controversial. Acting like Dirrell would school Calzaghe, like that guy was doing, is clearly idiotic. Okay, thank you for clarifying it. I guess I don't have to ask who you think would win between Calzaghe/ Froch LOL. I respect your opinion.

Your response to the poster that said Dirrell/Ward would both beat Calzaghe was "Direll couldn't even beat Froch clearly." which I took as you implying that if Dirrell didn't beat Froch clearly that he would not be able to beat Calzaghe. You, yourself, admit that it could have gone either way (and possibly got the hometown nod), so it was not a clear decision for Froch either... so I guess I don't get the logic of your statement. I apologize if I misinterpreted what you were getting at, but that's how I read it. What I mean is Dirrell hasn't shown a great performance so far against an opponent even close to Calzaghe's caliber, and against Froch who is a far inferior opponent than Calzaghe, he lost, even if it was controversial. Acting like Dirrell would school Calzaghe, like that guy was doing, is clearly idiotic.

No, because he didn't, simply. Many journalists had Froch winning a close decision. I think it could have gone either way but Froch was in his hometown so he got the decision. You may think Dirrell won, but it certainly was not clearly. Your response to the poster that said Dirrell/Ward would both beat Calzaghe was "Direll couldn't even beat Froch clearly." which I took as you implying that if Dirrell didn't beat Froch clearly that he would not be able to beat Calzaghe. You, yourself, admit that it could have gone either way (and possibly got the hometown nod), so it was not a clear decision for Froch either... so I guess I don't get the logic of your statement. I apologize if I misinterpreted what you were getting at, but that's how I read it.

That interview is sooo old...

Why? Because he didn't knock Froch out? Common man, that theory doesn't make sense IMO. No, because he didn't, simply. Many journalists had Froch winning a close decision. I think it could have gone either way but Froch was in his hometown so he got the decision. You may think Dirrell won, but it certainly was not clearly.

Dirrell would badly school Calzaghe. Name me a fighter Calzaghe fought that is quick and sharp as Dirrell. You couldn’t. Dirrell badly outboxs Calzaghe Calzaghe has more boxing skill. Its like Judah vs Tszyu. Granted I believe Judah could have recovered from that early stoppage and made it a fight, I dont believe he would have dominated despite the speed advantage. Its the same with Dirrell and Calzaghe. Dirrell may edge him but Joe's savvy keeps it close. I would even pick Joe but I agree with Dirrell. A 30 year old RJJ would pace Joe pretty easily.

Direll couldn't even beat Froch clearly. Why? Because he didn't knock Froch out? Common man, that theory doesn't make sense IMO.

The interviewer really annoyed me. How old are you? I'm 25. Whens your birthday? spetmber whatever he said. That was it, Like WTF up with your randomness bitch and why you even ask the q's without replying. Andre a cool dude though.

Sure he outboxed AA,but the Froch fight was horrible from both fighters and Froch won that,but regardless, Calzaghe is a far better fighter than Froch or AA. so you had froch winning at the end?

aww.....poor baby dirrell :bottle:

Typical deluded, arrogant, disrespectful American.

sorry man, your hero gets ****ed up by joe............. Joe is fast and has great work rate but his weakness is that his shots are a bit wide,he hits with the inside of his hands (maybe he avoids injuries).As Joe throws his many shots Andre will catch him with jabs and move out of harm's

Easy to say it since he knew he would never have to back it up, but he's just talking shit, Joe would slap him silly for 12 rounds and Dirrell knows that.

Did he really? I don't see a loss in Calzaghe's record :lol1: oh yea, cuz i said he lost didn't i? :lol1: someone needs comprehension classes :lol1:

Rough swarmers like who? He fought like a queer against Froch and,despite boxing well,won the wooden spoon oscar for his cowardly lion rendition at the end of the AA fight. Who else has he fought even worth mentioning? yea, but did he outbox the shit outta AA? i dont give a fukk if he fought like a queer did he or did he not outbox, outpoint, stagger and beat froch? the only way calzgahe could win against dirrell is the same way froch won, by high way robbery in his hometown

Joe Calzaghe beats the shit of dirrell and stops him,joe was very quick with great a stamina and a good chin,if dirrell beat joe i would be shocked,no chance What stoppage?Those slaps dont stop no one. The guy landed 1000 shots on a fighter and the fighter left on his two feet,he couldnt even knock out Roy Jones who has been getting Kayoed since 2003 even by bums

if you wanna use triangle thoeries, robin reid beat the living daylights out of calzaghe, froch ko'd reid in about 3 rounds, so by that theory, froch would ko calzaghe Did he really? I don't see a loss in Calzaghe's record :lol1:

Direll couldn't even beat Froch clearly. if you wanna use triangle thoeries, robin reid beat the living daylights out of calzaghe, froch ko'd reid in about 3 rounds, so by that theory, froch would ko calzaghe

Dirrell would get his ass whopped by cocaine rage.