As I heard it the tiebreaker is based on the number of rounds won. That would put Dirrell quite high given his close loss to Froch.
that would give dirrell an advantage over kessler, abraham, froch, or green if he's tied w/ any of them as of now
kessler loses to froch and ward loses to green in round 2 he would still have a shot without beating ward.
Why would green have to lose to ward? If froch beats kessler, then Ward beats green, would he be in either way?
Is it for sure he has to win, or is there other ways for him to get in?
I actually think he will win, but Ward is no joke.
As I heard it the tiebreaker is based on the number of rounds won. That would put Dirrell quite high given his close loss to Froch.
Gonna be funny seeing which one of these cheaters' underhand tactics prevail on the night. Damn, imagine if Ward lands one of those headbutts on Dirrell, can't wait to see Dirrell's performance if that happens.
Is it for sure he has to win, or is there other ways for him to get in?
I actually think he will win, but Ward is no joke.
kessler loses to froch and ward loses to green in round 2 he would still have a shot without beating ward.
Why the tie-breaking mechanism was never announced?
I heard there is a tie-breaking mechanism.
Even if Dirrell gets eliminated, though, he still earned himself a name, because he gave Abraham a boxing lesson.