Bearing in mind you're not the one in the ring and as human beings we have been cheering at men brutally beating or killing eachother since the days of the colleseum..
Do you really care if any boxer is on roids?
Course most people would love PAC to take the test, but it's mainly because you wanna see the great fight ain't it?
well the truth of the matter is that alot of things would be different in boxing if steroids never existed. certain eras would be less valuable, particularly circa 1970ish golden age of heavyweights. It was approved for human use in 62 (winstrol)
I don't believe in the loch ness monster, I don't believe in ghosts, and I don't believe lyle shavers norton etc were all natural.
It would be good if there were no peds. I think since there is almost no testing in boxing, many boxers are on them. It's in most fights I think unfair to not take them. If there was testing there would still be some people who would get away with it. Boxers would find something they don't know how to test for. Or simply pay people off so they can get away with it. I've heard things like gene doping are a problem now also.
^ no nuthugging at all. i'm a fan (in order) of cotto, pacquiao, marquez, mosley, calzaghe, hatton etc etc. so as you can see it's not like i only follow one and there's no boxing world outside of him.
i absolutely don't care if any of my fav fighters load their gloves or use peds before the fight, specially if i hate/dislike the guy they'll be fighting against (mayweather would be a great example). survival of the fittest.
I hope you don't really believe that.
I care, b, I want to know the wins are legit, b...
Thing is you'll never kno 100% will u? Everyone thought pac was clean now there's a question mark over his head..
I care about having a level playing field in all sports, but I'm not going to pretend like I care that much to where I'm going to make my voice heard or boycott sports.
Bearing in mind you're not the one in the ring and as human beings we have been cheering at men brutally beating or killing eachother since the days of the colleseum..
Do you really care if any boxer is on roids?
Course most people would love PAC to take the test, but it's mainly because you wanna see the great fight ain't it?
Uhh yeah!! :thinking:
^ no nuthugging at all. i'm a fan (in order) of cotto, pacquiao, marquez, mosley, calzaghe, hatton etc etc. so as you can see it's not like i only follow one and there's no boxing world outside of him.
i absolutely don't care if any of my fav fighters load their gloves or use peds before the fight, specially if i hate/dislike the guy they'll be fighting against (mayweather would be a great example). survival of the fittest.
Your joking right?
Bearing in mind you're not the one in the ring and as human beings we have been cheering at men brutally beating or killing eachother since the days of the colleseum..
Do you really care if any boxer is on roids?
Course most people would love PAC to take the test, but it's mainly because you wanna see the great fight ain't it?
i think there needs to be a clearer definition of what a ped is.somethin like nandrolone which toney was caught wit shouldnt be a ped,cause thats prescribed to help heal injurys.somethin like epo whih increases oxygen flow could really help fighters and make for better fights.ped is just to broad a term really
Drug em' up to the eyeballs, lets see the limitations of mankind.
Get Usain Bolt on them too, I wanna see the 100m run in under a second.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I don't condone it but I'm more than positive that the mayority of boxers/athletes are in some kind of PED's one way or another, that's a fact.
More that positive...Majority likely means more than 50%. That is a big claim. Any proof?
i honestly don't care as a long as they're not using it against my boxer. but i could care less if the fighter i'm rooting for does, whatever it takes, **** it.
Wow...are you serious? :thinking:
Jeez...nuthug much?