If he beat everyone in the Super6, no question. No one in the UK would recognise it though as theyn are all fooled by the 0,the record years as title holder and wins over RJJ and Bhop.
Not a fan of Frochs personally though.
Yes...Joe would have never faced these guys in the tournament at any point in his career. Defenses are good but who they are against should be taken in consideration.
I'd say yes in terms of over all comp, but Calzaghe faced some guys that would beat Froch IMO.
I also feel Calzaghe would have beaten Forch also. I can't see Fprch winning more than 6 rounds and I also can't see Calzaghe getting KTFO by Froch who is very slow.
No. And he won't win anyway, unless the judges decide to give him a gift in every single fight.
this tournament would be really fun if sven ottke was in it.
yes he would be greater than joe if he actually won the super 6 undefeated, but i don't think he will. I couln't really judge the dirrell fight with honesty cause i though dirrell was a totally pussy and the fight was just a stinkout where both looked shit, but dirrell made the fight go that way so since he did that and i paid for it twice to watch that shit, i allow froch that one.
Calzaghe also has a couple or really close fights where some thought he lost, mainly reid and hopkins.
if he won that wit a couple KO's and a clear win against dirrell, then yes i'd consider him above Calz, even tho his chances of this are quite slim IMO
Well he beat Taylor, he "beat" Dirrell, he would have to beat Kessler, beat Arthur Abraham, after that its the semis I think right?
But yes, imo he would be a greater 168 lber
What are Taylor's credentials at 168?
Shot Lacy? The same Lacy shot Roy destroyed?
If he got through the entire Super6 undefeated then yeah, he'd be greater than Joe quite easily tbh.
That level of competition, consistently, on opponents home-turf, at this stage in his career, trumps Joes "0".