Ouma got robbed!!!!!!!

Hell yeah he was robbed! The thing I hate most about boxing is the judges and their ridiculous decisions. They seem to clearly have a huge bias over younger fighters, prospects, and the guys that are "supposed" to win. This has to stop! Ouma shouldve won this, Collazo and Glen Johnson should be champions, and Guzman should have an extra loss on his record. It's just the way shit is I guess...

We never got the fight over here but from reading this thrread alone imma say this is another case of the word robbery getting over used when it sounds more like a poor decision, a few people here have said they thought Vanes won so it cant have been that one sided that it was a ROBBERY. Anyways Fukk Vanes i dont like that guy and Fukk the shite judges!

I thought a draw would have been very appropriate. Vanes controlled the early action, the announcers were talking about ouma's effectiveness but I didnt see that until later in the fight. After the middle rounds Ouma was mugging vanes and after the eye got cut it was bugging him, the knockdown looked like Vanes feet were crossed and he fell after getting hit. Technically still a knockdown but he wasnt hurt at all. I thought Vanes deserved a draw, but if Ouma won, I wouldnt have complained. the Cards were totally wrong.

Everyone I've talked to about the fight says Ouma was robbed. Sounds like a bullshit decision. Not surprised the white supremacist had Vanes winning though lol.

i thought Vanes won the fight VERY clearly :lol1: How? He got outworked in a lot of rounds, knocked down, missed a lot too. Winning very clearly is giving him the scores that the judges gave him, which were completely and utterly wrong. That fight was not a clear victory for either guy, though Ouma did more according to nearly everyone here especially with the KD. If it was a clear win for anyone it was for Ouma, not Vanes. Clear win for Vanes? :nonono:

ouma won to me. vanes looked sloppy tonight for some reason.

the judges knew who they were voting for before they sat down tonight :D

I would have been fine with any fighter to win, the only problem i have is with the scores It was a fantastic fight, sad that we have to talk about all this crap and not the actual fight

ouma got robbed......and the fact that anyone could think this figt was close disgusts me......flashy punches dont mean effectiveness.........ouma controlled the fight and landed at will with his jab......

Kassim controlled the fight, Vanes was complaining about his eye the whole time, and the knockdown in the 9th secured Kassims vicory IMO lame ass scorecards

Had Ouma winning but the chips were definitely stacked against him.

Armenian mafia had the fix in from the get go. 97-93 twice my ass

Robberyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

ouma won with the kd. they ****ed him.

i thought Vanes won the fight VERY clearly

Damn!!!... it really pisses me off when these bs decisions happens... there was no doubt that ouma won... and the scores were lop sided for vanes..... WTF!!!! boxing is business, not a real sport. BS decisions, PEDs, daylight robberies (this wasn't one but it was still a bad decision imo, specially those scores). People still pay for it and Vanes one day will be sucking us of 50+ bucks so we see him decisively dropped by a better fighter than Ouma.:boxing:

i had ouma winning close , a vanes win is was not a robbery just a close decision but the scorecards were terrible