featherweight pac versus lightweight floyd

yorue missing the point here. apparently, youre not aware of the greatest weapon in pacs arsenal back then, it was his relentless aggression, not exactly his speed. his speed and power compliment his relentless aggression of course but it was his aggression that puts him above any competition back then. todays pac is a controlled aggression. im not sure you can beat floyd with a controlled aggression, but im certain you can beat floyd with relentless aggression the relentless agression is prolly the culprit that almost made him lose to marquez.

Floyd will be aggresive March 13th I say aggressive pot shotting would be a better way to put it.

interesting....whats your prediction for March 13th if pac reverts back to his ultra-relentless offense like he was @ 126, plus his new found right and that little technical aspect of his current game (dart in-out), he beats floyd anytime anywhere

Yea it was a stupid thread to begin with. yorue missing the point here. apparently, youre not aware of the greatest weapon in pacs arsenal back then, it was his relentless aggression, not exactly his speed. his speed and power compliment his relentless aggression of course but it was his aggression that puts him above any competition back then. todays pac is a controlled aggression. im not sure you can beat floyd with a controlled aggression, but im certain you can beat floyd with relentless aggression

Floyd wins, featherweight Pac was worse technically, one handed and not as strong. featherweight pac throws lots of punches, he keeps coming in, hes so fast, his aggression was a lot intense. against floyd, the pac that beats barrera has a greater chance than the pac that beat cotto-hatton-hoya

lol what about Floyd? Was he slow as a LW? Pac was one dimensional as a Featherweight. There is no way he is beating Floyd. The LW version of Pac would have a better chance then the featherweight version of Pac... Yea it was a stupid thread to begin with.

hes so fast then and ultra relentless. thats what beat floyd, not by being technical Again, Floyd was super fast back then and he was also way more aggressive. You guys only look at one side. Floyd didnt fight the same way then that he does now

he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure. lol what about Floyd? Was he slow as a LW? Pac was one dimensional as a Featherweight. There is no way he is beating Floyd. The LW version of Pac would have a better chance then the featherweight version of Pac...

Floyd at 135 threw punches much more than now. Pac at 126 was a more flawed fighter than now. You do the math.

Floyd wins, featherweight Pac was worse technically, one handed and not as strong.

Pacquiao would lose--he wasn't as technical then as he is today. hes so fast then and ultra relentless. thats what beat floyd, not by being technical

he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure. Are you serious? Are you forgetting how fast Floyd was back then?

Lightweight Floyd wins clearly. Pac was not a complete fighter at featherweight. he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure.

Lightweight Floyd wins clearly. Pac was not a complete fighter at featherweight.

Pacquiao would lose--he wasn't as technical then as he is today.