It is odd that Duran didnt even mention Salvador Sanchez who beat Gomez. IMHO Sanchez was on his way to being possibly being the greatest mexican fighter and maybe the greatest latin fighter. But I look at the people Monzon destroyed as Griffith,Napoles, Benvenutti, and Valdez twice. His 14 defenses and his 87-3-9 record, and he no losses in his last 77 or 78 fights, WOW, he is my pick although he wasent a good person as he killed his wife and beat women.
can someone translate this? thx
Translation:
Duran starts off by joking about some ring he lost. Then the interviewer asks him, “After you, who do you consider the best Latin fighters in history?” Duran responds, “That’s tough.” The interviewer says, “Our friend, ‘The Explosive Thin Man’ (Alexis Arguello) must be there.” Duran agrees, “Yes, ‘El Flaco.’” Next, Duran includes (Julio Cesar) Chavez. “Every one in their own time,” Duran adds. Then Duran says, “Tito Trinidad,” but he corrects himself and says, “Wilfredo Gomez and Wilfredo Benitez, but I lean more towards Benitez.”
The interviewer then asks him, “What about those boxers from biblical times, like Kid Chocolate and Kid Gavilan?” Duran replies, “Well, I can’t speak on them because they’re from another era. I don’t know anything about those people.” Duran continues, “But, if we’re going to speak about that era, they speak of ‘Sugar’ Ray Robinson, who was truly good. I was at a memorial, I think it was in Miami, where they showed all his fights, and the guy was really tremendous. He wasn’t a great power puncher (the next point is unintelligible), which is the most important thing.”
The interviewer continues, “And I always love asking you, for example, what would have happened between Roberto ‘Hands of Stone’ Duran and Manny ‘Pac-man’ Pacquiao?” (I found what comes next funny, because Duran starts to refer to himself in the third person.) Duran replies, “The words say it, ‘Stone Hands,’ brother, ‘Hands of Stone,’ pop! (As he raises his clenched fist.) What’s up is that Roberto Duran had three qualities as a boxer. First, he was strong; second, he hit hard; and third, he was very intelligent inside the ring. Most of the fighters that beat Roberto Duran did so because of Roberto Duran’s shamelessness. He would go up in weight, then they would offer him money -- he might not have fought in 6, 7, 8 months -- they would offer him money and they would make him come down from, say, 200 lbs to 155, 160 lbs and he would take it. They’d beat me, but they didn’t do anything to me (they didn‘t hurt me). Look, (‘Sugar’ Ray) Leonard, the two times he dropped in weight, the two times he attempted to do what Roberto Duran did, he got knocked out. Norris knocked him out (Terry Norris won a 12 round unanimous decision), and he was knocked out by the Puerto Rican (snaps his fingers trying to remember the name) Camacho (Hector Camacho won by TKO in the 5th round). Roberto Duran, it was known, would take off up to thirty pounds and no one could beat him.”
The interview wraps up with the two men returning to joking about Duran’s lost ring.
duran ko's both pac and mayweather 130-147.
i think at 147 pac stands a much better chance. i think at 135 though, unless mayweather gets caught, hes going to survive. but thats about it. my opinion of duran is very very high though.
In fairness, he did also say he couldnt talk about fighters before his time as Kid gavilan and Kid CHocolate when asked. Interesting, he didnt mention Jose Napoles or Carlos Monzon. It is big debate about who is the greatest latin fighter? Notice no talk about DLH? LOL
Lol I was trying to say, that the interview didnt had anything to do with Pacquiao, it was aout the est latin fihters, and then they poped teh question and Duran answer briefly!!!!!
Got ya.
I heard them talking about Latin fighters, but Duran's Panamanian Spanish is hard for me to understand. :lol1:
But yeah, like Tua said, Duran beats both Mayweather and Pacquiao.
Roach said it himself. the 135lb version of duran beats pac.
probably beats the sh!t out of him.
135lb duran UD's mayweather as well.
duran ko's both pac and mayweather 130-147.
That interview didnt had anything to do with Pacquiao.
They were talking aout the best Latinamericans boxers besides him and he said Arguello, Gomez, Benitez, Trinidad, JCC.
Then when they asked him about Pacquiao, he said that he was too big, strong, Powerfull and intellegent for Pacquiao
I'm confused by your post Ch@mp.
You said it had nothing to do with Pacquiao, but you say they mentioned him. I heard his name too.
So is the last part about Duran in a potential fight with Pacquiao?
That interview didnt had anything to do with Pacquiao.
They were talking aout the best Latinamericans boxers besides him and he said Arguello, Gomez, Benitez, Trinidad, JCC.
Then when they asked him about Pacquiao, he said that he was too big, strong, Powerfull and intellegent for Pacquiao
Roach said it himself. the 135lb version of duran beats pac.
probably beats the sh!t out of him.
135lb duran UD's mayweather as well.
That interview didnt had anything to do with Pacquiao.
They were talking aout the best Latinamericans boxers besides him and he said Arguello, Gomez, Benitez, Trinidad, JCC.
Then when they asked him about Pacquiao, he said that he was too big, strong, Powerfull and intellegent for Pacquiao
Actually he never mentioned that about Pacquiao. He said that the qualities Roberto Duran had as a fighter was that he was Strong, Punched Hard, and was Intelligent in the ring. He then goes on to say that the only reason why Roberto Duran ever lost was because of his own faults. He fought at too high a weight class or he was drained. Even though he was fighting bigger fighters, they'd beat him but they never hurt him.