jermaine taylor verses froch-even the ring side press had froch winning..

I don't write shit at all. what a b*tch

the Judges had Taylor winning. it was a split decision going into the 12th...so froch would have still won... "Scores at the time of the stoppage were 106-102 for Taylor on two scorecards and 106-102 for Froch on the third. In other words, Taylor simply needed to make it to the final bell to win the title - even after being knocked down". Again ive exposed all these froch haters as frauds.. http://icanhascheezburger.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/hahaha-lulz.jpg Fail.

This has gotten rediculous.

I don't write shit at all.

British_fan, no offence mate but you are one of the worst posters on this site. I've seen some of the garbage you've come out with before and it's laughable. because i disagree with you doesnt make it garbage and even if i do occasionally come out with a bad post,that isnt much compared too you who decides too write a load of s*it everytime you post no offence mate,but you are a terrible poster,but keep trying

British_fan, no offence mate but you are one of the worst posters on this site. I've seen some of the garbage you've come out with before and it's laughable.

slimshandy69 fails once again,what a surprise

Most score cards were 1-2 points either way for the Dirrell fight. As such, how can anyone say it was a robbery on a close SD? Doesn't make any sense.

Froch won the fight against Dirrell because he was the champion and the judges will not score a close round to a challenger that is not engaging, especially if the champion is making the running; this system has its limits for most judges, a perfect exapmle being the Haye Valuev fight, where the champion's aggression was so slow and clumsy, that Haye could win a round with one or two clean shots. Although Froch was made to look silly at times, he still landed enough (see Dirrell's face) for those debatable rounds to go to him. IF they both came into the fight without a belt, I would have given the fight to Dirrell, however you can't come do just enough in the champion's back yard - you have to demonstrate that you really want it and despite Dirrell's quite evident skill, the one thing he failed to demonstrate was that extra 10%, ironically if he had engaged for just half a minute more in a couple of those rounds it could have been a different story. However, like several others have already said, its academic, Froch won one fight by KO and scraped through (IMHO) in the other by virtue of being the incumbent. None of it will make much difference when he comes around in a Danish Ambulance asking what happened post Kessler.

bunce wasnt commentating the fight u idiot it was rawling and thaxton who both scored for dirrel, exposed as fraud again you fool. rawling and thaxton was itv you idiot...buncey was primetime so you were wrong..buncey who was primetime sdcored it for froch by 4 rounds..

froch wont be fighting for another few months , he is not relevant right now so what is the point of this thread?

bunce wasnt commentating the fight u idiot it was rawling and thaxton who both scored for dirrel, exposed as fraud again you fool.

As a British boxing fan there is simply no way anyone could have Froch winning that fight. He had closed the gap somewhat, but Jermain was still a few rounds up on my scorecard. Froch did what he needed to and stopped Jermain, but he left it very late and was lucky that Jermain faded. lmao this is the worst post of the thread alert...how was it lucky froch was bouncing taylors head around in the 11th and 12th like a yo yo... Please dont post again...

even primetime commentators scored for dirrell and they lick everyone of their fighters balls. lmao please dont make up facts...steve buncey the prime time commentor had froch 4 rounds up you idiot... Again ive exposed all these froch haters as frauds..

As a British boxing fan there is simply no way anyone could have Froch winning that fight. He had closed the gap somewhat, but Jermain was still a few rounds up on my scorecard. Froch did what he needed to and stopped Jermain, but he left it very late and was lucky that Jermain faded.

Any way u look at it Froch beat Taylor so this discussion is moot!!

so why do all the top pundits have froch winning...incuding dan rafael steven bunce jimmy iowa and graham houston...plus the ringside press had it for froch... doesnt bode to well for you does it...at least when castillo beat mayweather it was unanimous to all the top pundits that castillo beat mayweather... If you go by the "Official scorecard" Taylor would have won if it went to a decision, but it didn't so who gives a shit. Bottom line is Froch sucks!!

even primetime commentators scored for dirrell and they lick everyone of their fighters balls.

thank u lol Stop chatting rubbish... Froch is gay, and soon will get schooled... he did well to win the fight against taylor... hes lost the last fight, end of so why do all the top pundits have froch winning...incuding dan rafael steven bunce jimmy iowa and graham houston...plus the ringside press had it for froch... doesnt bode to well for you does it...at least when castillo beat mayweather it was unanimous to all the top pundits that castillo beat mayweather...

Who gives a shit? Froch wn by KO. Period.