Santiago said that in the last 24/7. i co-sign. there is no way at all that manny will beat Miguel, as a matter of fact, manny will be so badly beaten that he will not be able to fight again till at least june 2010, mark my words. all this image created by the media using Oscar/Hatton fights as a springboard to make predictions, will fall like the old Roman empire. COTTO BY KO.
no one will get beaten "Badly". Both corner aren't going to let these guys take too much punishment. Too much on the line for future fights.
If Cotto doesn't hurt manny early its lights out for miguel. I'm sure that Manny will put plently of hands on Miguel this saturday.
No, what he's saying is: If Cotto wins it means nothing. And if Pacquiao wins, Cotto is a bum.
Strange.
how am i calling cotto a bum? I said he was an elite WW.
Well that's what makes Manny Pacquiao different. Again, the same argument could be made at 140, 135 whatever. If you're trying to emphasize the weight disparity then you're doing it rather foolishly. No welterweight champ should beat an elite light heavyweight (just look around today) yet Tommy Hearns did it to Virgil Hill. So spare us the "I get right to the heart of the argument" crap. You're still talking about a 15-year-old Pacquiao. You're almost there, only 15 more years to go.
no shit... that's why tommy hearns is an ATG... its not supposed to happen and when it does, it should amaze muthafukkers. but in general elite WWs shouldn't be losing to smaller fighters.
But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?
So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?
1) who is they?
2) he's grown into 140 lbs.. not WW
3) yes, pac is too small and should lose to cotto
No, what he's saying is: If Cotto wins it means nothing. And if Pacquiao wins, Cotto is a bum.
Strange.
oh, lol. I just noticed the signature, I understand now.
But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?
So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?
No, what he's saying is: If Cotto wins it means nothing. And if Pacquiao wins, Cotto is a bum.
Strange.
no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.
But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?
So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?
lolz... I say the number because I know it will get a response. someone needs to remiind people that there are weight divisions for a reason. no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.
of course! people rehash the same old arguments.... I just cut through the crap and get right to the heart of the argument... I don't make pretenses like some of these other guys.
Well that's what makes Manny Pacquiao different. Again, the same argument could be made at 140, 135 whatever. If you're trying to emphasize the weight disparity then you're doing it rather foolishly. No welterweight champ should beat an elite light heavyweight (just look around today) yet Tommy Hearns did it to Virgil Hill. So spare us the "I get right to the heart of the argument" crap. You're still talking about a 15-year-old Pacquiao. You're almost there, only 15 more years to go.
Actually, it seems that number matters to you more than anyone. Whatever dude, I think everyone sees through the crap by now. Keep on.
lolz... I say the number because I know it will get a response. someone needs to remiind people that there are weight divisions for a reason. no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.
but still willing to read over those same arguments and comment on them.
honestly, you are made of fail
of course! people rehash the same old arguments.... I just cut through the crap and get right to the heart of the argument... I don't make pretenses like some of these other guys.
c'mon man... every fukking pac/cotto thread is a rehash of old arguments!!!! I'm to lazy to be creative.but still willing to read over those same arguments and comment on them.
honestly, you are made of fail
Santiago said that in the last 24/7. i co-sign. there is no way at all that manny will beat Miguel, as a matter of fact, manny will be so badly beaten that he will not be able to fight again till at least june 2010, mark my words. all this image created by the media using Oscar/Hatton fights as a springboard to make predictions, will fall like the old Roman empire. COTTO BY KO.
I Dont think so, by Pac movements and speed cotto is in trouble the only chance for cotto to win is what they call "lucky punch", other than that nothing i like cotto when his fighting somebody but for a speedy left handed
like Pac he will be KOd. you can review cottos fight with southpaw his very hitable. Sori man we are in the same side before but not this time my prediction is Pac will win by KO in mid rounds probably seven.
it's the same old shit with a different stink. the only time there are new insights are when we see or hear things from the training camps. Don't think you're some kinda innovator.
for reals... I dunno why you guys get so emotional about a number.
Actually, it seems that number matters to you more than anyone. Whatever dude, I think everyone sees through the crap by now. Keep on.
At least he's now hedging on his:lol1: drivel.
And for the record, every post hasn't been a rehashed old argument. There have been some great observers on this site and lots of posters with keen insight. Sure, there's the usual crap but I guess you'd prefer to be a part of that group.
it's the same old shit with a different stink. the only time there are new insights are when we see or hear things from the training camps. Don't think you're some kinda innovator.
We get it. You're just trying too hard. Everyone knows Pac's not a WW.
for reals... I dunno why you guys get so emotional about a number.
like I said, I'm just not creative as you. but every post you make is basically the same old argument.
also, the 106 is just a number to symbolize that pac isn't a WW. that's all that is. stop crying about it.
again 106 is just a number to symbolize that pac isn't a WW. that's all that is. stop crying about it.
c'mon man... every fukkin cotto/pac thread is a rehash of old arguments... ya'll think ya'll got something new to say everytime, but its the same old shit.
At least he's now hedging on his:lol1: drivel.
And for the record, every post hasn't been a rehashed old argument. There have been some great observers on this site and lots of posters with keen insight. Sure, there's the usual crap but I guess you'd prefer to be a part of that group.
Old arguments is one thing. Posting the same wayward sentence is another. We understand that Cotto is the naturally bigger guy. But, unlike you, we also understand that Pacquiao's weight at 15 is irrelevant.
like I said, I'm just not creative as you. but every post you make is basically the same old argument.
also, the 106 is just a number to symbolize that pac isn't a WW. that's all that is. stop crying about it.
Its a meaningless fact since he hasn't weighed 106 for 15 years. So why bother bringing it up if not only so you can hedge his loss w/ an excuse?
And no.
Are you?
again 106 is just a number to symbolize that pac isn't a WW. that's all that is. stop crying about it.
He knows it too, he just uses it as an excuse and thinks that repeating it enough will convince people that it actually means something.
c'mon man... every fukkin cotto/pac thread is a rehash of old arguments... ya'll think ya'll got something new to say everytime, but its the same old shit.
PullCounter needs to be banned for trolling. He posts this in every thread.
Pullcounter>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You ,whoever you are.
Back to the topic, you TS, CAN'T say that there's is no way Pac can beat Miguel Cotto.
Pacquiao isn't a bum. lol
c'mon man... every fukking pac/cotto thread is a rehash of old arguments!!!! I'm to lazy to be creative.
Old arguments is one thing. Posting the same wayward sentence is another. We understand that Cotto is the naturally bigger guy. But, unlike you, we also understand that Pacquiao's weight at 15 is irrelevant.
16y ago
santiago: Pacquiao will be beaten badly this saturday. | BoxingScene Community